The only difference between FIREs and the dole bludger is that FIREs expect to do a few years' work first, but they also expect to draw more money than the unemployment benefit, so there you go.
And this is why I don't think many of us are in a position to judge dole bludgers.
I strongly disagree here. I won't presume to speak for everyone else here, but in my opinion, there's a world of difference. The money that a FIREd person has represents an accumulated unpaid debt that society owes that person for the value they have contributed to the economy by their work. They have chosen (or in some cases, been forced) to set aside some of their compensation, so that when the time comes that they either cannot or do not wish to work longer, society owes them enough that they can call in that debt and live comfortably. A dole bludger, roundly speaking, has not contributed to society and therefore is owed nothing, from a purely economic perspective.
[/quote]
Like you, I don't think FIRED have much in common with chronic dolers. But your reasoning is whack.
Society owes the FIRED nothing. Society does not owe the FIRED a 'debt' because the FIRED saved their money instead of pissing it away. You aren't 'calling in societies' debt' when you FIRE. You're making a decision based on your own planning, fortitude, and good fortune.
If anything, the FIRED have a debt to the society which, by its structure and opportunities, allowed the FIRED to become wealthy enough to cease work.