Author Topic: Ukraine  (Read 772469 times)

Sibley

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8034
  • Location: Northwest Indiana
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #400 on: March 05, 2022, 02:22:44 PM »
THOSE FUCKING BASTARDS.

There was a ceasefire in Mariupol, so that civilians could evacuate. Except that Russia didn't ceasefire. They started shelling the gathering points for the evacuating civilians. Specifically those spots. I haven't seen a death count, but I did see that 2000 were attempting to evacuate.

https://twitter.com/lfrayer/status/1500097201732829194?t=ERCfTbgA7tG5wkV5_Dp1fg&s=19
https://twitter.com/PaulaChertok/status/1500129586117427201?t=QDf5r7eFFtpT5kb83uixWQ&s=19

I hope Putin burns in hell.

I saw this, and it's just insane. I mean, this makes no strategic or military sense that I'm aware of. It's one (very evil) thing to not care about civilian casualties as you're trying to destroy the other nation's military. This is a whole other level. What on earth does he think something like this will accomplish.....
It could be that some of the Russian units operating in Ukraine are in separate command structures - there seem to have been a lot of saboteur units embedded before the war started, for instance.  It's possible that a negotiated cease fire with some Russian forces isn't communicated to or agreed by other Russian forces.

Or it's a deliberate and organised terror tactic, of course.  Which seems entirely plausible, in the circumstances.

That really doesn't help them. Because not hitting women and children and the elderly with bombs should be a given. Not something you need to be ordered to do.

former player

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 9140
  • Location: Avalon
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #401 on: March 05, 2022, 02:32:36 PM »
THOSE FUCKING BASTARDS.

There was a ceasefire in Mariupol, so that civilians could evacuate. Except that Russia didn't ceasefire. They started shelling the gathering points for the evacuating civilians. Specifically those spots. I haven't seen a death count, but I did see that 2000 were attempting to evacuate.

https://twitter.com/lfrayer/status/1500097201732829194?t=ERCfTbgA7tG5wkV5_Dp1fg&s=19
https://twitter.com/PaulaChertok/status/1500129586117427201?t=QDf5r7eFFtpT5kb83uixWQ&s=19

I hope Putin burns in hell.

I saw this, and it's just insane. I mean, this makes no strategic or military sense that I'm aware of. It's one (very evil) thing to not care about civilian casualties as you're trying to destroy the other nation's military. This is a whole other level. What on earth does he think something like this will accomplish.....
It could be that some of the Russian units operating in Ukraine are in separate command structures - there seem to have been a lot of saboteur units embedded before the war started, for instance.  It's possible that a negotiated cease fire with some Russian forces isn't communicated to or agreed by other Russian forces.

Or it's a deliberate and organised terror tactic, of course.  Which seems entirely plausible, in the circumstances.

That really doesn't help them. Because not hitting women and children and the elderly with bombs should be a given. Not something you need to be ordered to do.
Well, the Russian army has killed civilians in every war they've fought in the last 40 years (Afghanistan, Chechnya, Georgia, Syria) so I don't think in those circumstances we can use "should be a given". It's just that previous versions of the current war in Ukraine have taken place just far enough away from Europe to minimise Western interest and interests, and against people who are just different enough, that we haven't previously read much or done much about it.

Blender Bender

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #402 on: March 05, 2022, 02:39:48 PM »
Except for an unhealthy obsession why are you bringing up Trump in relation to the Ukraine war which is happening now? Even if he were to win the next election are you implying the war will go the next 3 years?
I surely hope not. I hope it's done well before that. If it's not we have a lot to worry about.

OK, let me explain:
1. The only chance for Ukraine to survive if the west is united.
2. The west is mostly united. But in some places e.g. USA, the former president supports and admires Putler. Not only trump but some of his supporters too.
3. Basically putin elected trump to the office. That was putin's objective to make him president. The plan started 20 years ago, this is well documented online.
4. Thus trump was part of the plan to challenge the west, as putin is doing now.

So, like it or not, there is a strong connection, or just only to me?

Nate79

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 146
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #403 on: March 05, 2022, 02:46:45 PM »
Except for an unhealthy obsession why are you bringing up Trump in relation to the Ukraine war which is happening now? Even if he were to win the next election are you implying the war will go the next 3 years?
I surely hope not. I hope it's done well before that. If it's not we have a lot to worry about.

OK, let me explain:
1. The only chance for Ukraine to survive if the west is united.
2. The west is mostly united. But in some places e.g. USA, the former president supports and admires Putler. Not only trump but some of his supporters too.
3. Basically putin elected trump to the office. That was putin's objective to make him president. The plan started 20 years ago, this is well documented online.
4. Thus trump was part of the plan to challenge the west, as putin is doing now.

So, like it or not, there is a strong connection, or just only to me?
I think the West is as unified as ever and I don't see that changing no matter what Trump does or doesn't do. Unless you think Biden's actions would be swayed by it? I don't think it matters one iota, no one is listening to Trump in relation to this war.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


Blender Bender

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #404 on: March 05, 2022, 02:54:17 PM »
I think the West is as unified as ever and I don't see that changing no matter what Trump does or doesn't do. Unless you think Biden's actions would be swayed by it? I don't think it matters one iota, no one is listening to Trump in relation to this war.

Glad to hear that he is not listen to.

About Biden, could be. One scenario:

1. Strong sanctions against russia needed. now happening, good.
2. The sanctions for sure will cost acceleration of the inflation. So, likely will be worse.
3. The public getting more upset about the inflation.
4. Far right says: We were right, Biden destroyed the country. We were saying that if we were in office, such war would never happen. And putin is my friend, I would ask him not invade [or whatever].
5. Democrats defeated in all the next elections.

Regarding how long the war will last? Impossible to tell, but i think years; unless internal revolt in russia.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2022, 02:56:50 PM by Blender Bender »

LennStar

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4341
  • Location: Germany
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #405 on: March 05, 2022, 03:04:46 PM »
THOSE FUCKING BASTARDS.

There was a ceasefire in Mariupol, so that civilians could evacuate. Except that Russia didn't ceasefire. They started shelling the gathering points for the evacuating civilians. Specifically those spots. I haven't seen a death count, but I did see that 2000 were attempting to evacuate.

https://twitter.com/lfrayer/status/1500097201732829194?t=ERCfTbgA7tG5wkV5_Dp1fg&s=19
https://twitter.com/PaulaChertok/status/1500129586117427201?t=QDf5r7eFFtpT5kb83uixWQ&s=19

I hope Putin burns in hell.

I saw this, and it's just insane. I mean, this makes no strategic or military sense that I'm aware of. It's one (very evil) thing to not care about civilian casualties as you're trying to destroy the other nation's military. This is a whole other level. What on earth does he think something like this will accomplish.....
The general consensus is that Putin is scared of hwo successfull the Ukraine is definding against his 2-day long special operation (see the cesoring of basically everything now) and wants to break the spirit of the defenders and population (as were the Allied city bombings in WWII).

Imho at this moment this is a backfiring move. It's too early for serious moral attrition and the hideousness will only make the Ukrainians fight even harder.

-----

There are Putin fans everywhere. It hurts seeing people regurgitating the "Russia is only defending itself" even now. Some people just value "strength" more than anythign else. Maybe the 1% psychopaths.

Unfotunately the situation is unsolveable.
Putin won't stop. It's his dream to bring back Little Russia and this is likely his last chance. He is totally out of touch/uninterested in his people and still key figures and army will not revolt.
Ukraine (and the West) will cannot accept his peace conditions (which are his war goals), because those basically mean the end of the country.

This will end with about 1/3 of Ukraine destroyed, 5 millions fleeing, Russian people suffering too and the Russian army having to retreat eventually because they are not strong/numerous enough for a long real occupation (checkpoints at every third corner etc.) which is the only thing that could stop guerilla attacks.

And that's assuming there is no nuclear in the war. 

Ah, I am going to vomit, excuse me.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2022, 03:08:22 PM by LennStar »

Blender Bender

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #406 on: March 05, 2022, 03:07:34 PM »
THOSE FUCKING BASTARDS.

There was a ceasefire in Mariupol, so that civilians could evacuate. Except that Russia didn't ceasefire. They started shelling the gathering points for the evacuating civilians. Specifically those spots. I haven't seen a death count, but I did see that 2000 were attempting to evacuate.

https://twitter.com/lfrayer/status/1500097201732829194?t=ERCfTbgA7tG5wkV5_Dp1fg&s=19
https://twitter.com/PaulaChertok/status/1500129586117427201?t=QDf5r7eFFtpT5kb83uixWQ&s=19

I hope Putin burns in hell.

I saw this, and it's just insane. I mean, this makes no strategic or military sense that I'm aware of. It's one (very evil) thing to not care about civilian casualties as you're trying to destroy the other nation's military. This is a whole other level. What on earth does he think something like this will accomplish.....
The general consensus is that Putin is scared of hwo successfull the Ukraine is definding against his 2-day long special operation (see the cesoring of basically everything now) and wants to break the spirit of the defenders and population (as were the Allied city bombings in WWII).

Imho at this moment this is a backfiring move. It's too early for serious moral attrition and the hideousness will only make the Ukrainians fight even harder.

-----

There are Putin fans everywhere. It hurts seeing people regurgitating the "Russia is only defending itself" even now. Some people just value "strength" more than anythign else. Maybe the 1% psychopaths.

Unfotunately the situation is unsolveable.
Putin won't stop. It's his dream to bring back Little Russia and this is likely his last chance.
Ukraine will cannot accept his peace conditions (which are his war goals), because those basically mean the end of the country.

This will end with about 1/3 of Ukraine destroyed, 5 millions fleeing, Russian people suffering too and the Russian army having to retreat eventually because they are not strong/numerous enough for a long real occupation (checkpoints at every third corner etc.) which is the only thing that could stop guerilla attacks.

Ah, I am going to vomit, excuse me.

Sharing the same outlook.

Sibley

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8034
  • Location: Northwest Indiana
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #407 on: March 05, 2022, 03:10:16 PM »
I think something's changed in Ukraine. And I'm basing this solely on Zelenky's videos. I've been watching them as we go, I've watched all of them but one (can't find a translation). There's been a progression, a pattern. The parts directed towards the Ukrainians have been consistent: praising the military for fighting, praising people for volunteering to fight, praising people for helping in the war effort. Keeping people's spirits up, giving them hope, etc.

Well, he posted a new video about 2 hours ago, the English subtitles one about an hour ago. And this one is very different. He's calling on the people to fight. All of them, in big or little ways. He's appealing to the people in the Donbas region as well.

I don't know what's changed, but something has. Something with the war, or something with their strategy.

Blender Bender

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #408 on: March 05, 2022, 03:17:22 PM »
I think something's changed in Ukraine. And I'm basing this solely on Zelenky's videos. I've been watching them as we go, I've watched all of them but one (can't find a translation). There's been a progression, a pattern. The parts directed towards the Ukrainians have been consistent: praising the military for fighting, praising people for volunteering to fight, praising people for helping in the war effort. Keeping people's spirits up, giving them hope, etc.

Well, he posted a new video about 2 hours ago, the English subtitles one about an hour ago. And this one is very different. He's calling on the people to fight. All of them, in big or little ways. He's appealing to the people in the Donbas region as well.

I don't know what's changed, but something has. Something with the war, or something with their strategy.

I think that the NATO's refusal for the no fly zone disappointed him and damped his spirit. I think he was counting on that.

Now he really feels that no-one from outside will help (directly) and the outlook is not looking good.
He i guess was hoping on some quickish "clean" resolution of the conflict. But now sees that the war will be dragged for years, relying on the future gorilla tactics.

In my opinion that was too much to ask NATO for such no fly zone, too dangerous for the whole world.

RunningintoFI

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 162
  • Paid to optimize. Love not to.
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #409 on: March 05, 2022, 03:33:58 PM »
Haven't read through the entire thread so forgive me if this was mentioned before page 6..

I don't know how Putin 'wins' this war.  Conquering all of Ukraine militarily will lead to an inevitable counter-insurgency of the largest land mass in Europe excluding Russia itself.  Trying to control that entire space against guerrilla style tactics will turn into a bloodbath for years to come for Russians and Ukrainians alike.  Preventing NATO re-supply from the West would be an extreme challenge while trying to maintain control over the major cities scattered about the country. 

At the same time, Putin backed himself into an unwinnable corner by invading a country with the professed idea of "liberating it from neo-Nazis" and all other sorts of insanely deranged statements.  To retreat would present him as a weak leader who couldn't even liberate people who in his mind wanted to be liberated.   The one thing he cannot afford to do to maintain his strongman image is retreat from the situation or even acknowledge that the effort is going poorly. 

Call me crazy here but it feels like Putin is putting himself into a purposeful trap at this point with two possible conclusions.
  • Escalate the situation and pull NATO into the war with some subterfuge - this will allow him to blame the West and claim this is now a defensive struggle to defend Russia and try to rally people into a defensive war of the motherland
  • Tactically nuke Ukraine and dare the rest of the world to respond knowing they will be afraid of escalating nuclear warfare

I am struggling to see an easy out here to the whole situation.  The world is hamstrung because of Russia's vast nuclear arsenal and Putin's clear willingness to make any and everyone suffer for his deranged desires.  I fear what happens if Putin feels trapped in a corner with no clear path to victory. 

dang1

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 528
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #410 on: March 05, 2022, 03:43:17 PM »
another Biden scenario:

Strong sanctions against Russia continues, worsening inflation.
The public getting more upset about the inflation.
Democrats blame inflation on Putin’s war.
Biden highlights his foreign policy in keeping international anti-Putin coalition intact / supporting Ukraine without enlarging the war (resists calls for no-fly zone).
Far right discredited with their pro-Putin leanings.
Democrats keep hold of Congress, White House.

Blender Bender

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #411 on: March 05, 2022, 03:48:16 PM »
Haven't read through the entire thread so forgive me if this was mentioned before page 6..

I don't know how Putin 'wins' this war.  Conquering all of Ukraine militarily will lead to an inevitable counter-insurgency of the largest land mass in Europe excluding Russia itself.  Trying to control that entire space against guerrilla style tactics will turn into a bloodbath for years to come for Russians and Ukrainians alike.  Preventing NATO re-supply from the West would be an extreme challenge while trying to maintain control over the major cities scattered about the country. 

At the same time, Putin backed himself into an unwinnable corner by invading a country with the professed idea of "liberating it from neo-Nazis" and all other sorts of insanely deranged statements.  To retreat would present him as a weak leader who couldn't even liberate people who in his mind wanted to be liberated.   The one thing he cannot afford to do to maintain his strongman image is retreat from the situation or even acknowledge that the effort is going poorly. 

Call me crazy here but it feels like Putin is putting himself into a purposeful trap at this point with two possible conclusions.
  • Escalate the situation and pull NATO into the war with some subterfuge - this will allow him to blame the West and claim this is now a defensive struggle to defend Russia and try to rally people into a defensive war of the motherland
  • Tactically nuke Ukraine and dare the rest of the world to respond knowing they will be afraid of escalating nuclear warfare

I am struggling to see an easy out here to the whole situation.  The world is hamstrung because of Russia's vast nuclear arsenal and Putin's clear willingness to make any and everyone suffer for his deranged desires.  I fear what happens if Putin feels trapped in a corner with no clear path to victory.

I think the most likely future for years is the bolded one. Putin will execute this script (no-one of his advisor would mention problems you see there). Will continue to bring more solders until whole Ukraine under control.
Putin will declare the end of the "operation". The world would disagree.  And putin will continue to fight the Ukrainians gorrilas.

Then he continues with Moldavia, Latvia etc. Until someone "replaces" him internally, or something very horrible happens.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2022, 03:50:26 PM by Blender Bender »

Nate79

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 146
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #412 on: March 05, 2022, 03:59:44 PM »
Haven't read through the entire thread so forgive me if this was mentioned before page 6..

I don't know how Putin 'wins' this war.  Conquering all of Ukraine militarily will lead to an inevitable counter-insurgency of the largest land mass in Europe excluding Russia itself.  Trying to control that entire space against guerrilla style tactics will turn into a bloodbath for years to come for Russians and Ukrainians alike.  Preventing NATO re-supply from the West would be an extreme challenge while trying to maintain control over the major cities scattered about the country. 

At the same time, Putin backed himself into an unwinnable corner by invading a country with the professed idea of "liberating it from neo-Nazis" and all other sorts of insanely deranged statements.  To retreat would present him as a weak leader who couldn't even liberate people who in his mind wanted to be liberated.   The one thing he cannot afford to do to maintain his strongman image is retreat from the situation or even acknowledge that the effort is going poorly. 

Call me crazy here but it feels like Putin is putting himself into a purposeful trap at this point with two possible conclusions.
  • Escalate the situation and pull NATO into the war with some subterfuge - this will allow him to blame the West and claim this is now a defensive struggle to defend Russia and try to rally people into a defensive war of the motherland
  • Tactically nuke Ukraine and dare the rest of the world to respond knowing they will be afraid of escalating nuclear warfare

I am struggling to see an easy out here to the whole situation.  The world is hamstrung because of Russia's vast nuclear arsenal and Putin's clear willingness to make any and everyone suffer for his deranged desires.  I fear what happens if Putin feels trapped in a corner with no clear path to victory.

I think the most likely future for years is the bolded one. Putin will execute this script (no-one of his advisor would mention problems you see there). Will continue to bring more solders until whole Ukraine under control.
Putin will declare the end of the "operation". The world would disagree.  And putin will continue to fight the Ukrainians gorrilas.

Then he continues with Moldavia, Latvia etc. Until someone "replaces" him internally, or something very horrible happens.
Latvia is NATO meaning US joins the war with the rest of NATO.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


former player

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 9140
  • Location: Avalon
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #413 on: March 05, 2022, 04:26:52 PM »
I think the most likely future for years is the bolded one. Putin will execute this script (no-one of his advisor would mention problems you see there). Will continue to bring more solders until whole Ukraine under control.
Putin will declare the end of the "operation". The world would disagree.  And putin will continue to fight the Ukrainians gorrilas.

Then he continues with Moldavia, Latvia etc. Until someone "replaces" him internally, or something very horrible happens.
Latvia is NATO meaning US joins the war with the rest of NATO.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Putin has started to talk about sanctions being "akin to an act of war", so he's started laying the groundwork for a further "defensive invasion".

OtherJen

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5267
  • Location: Metro Detroit
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #414 on: March 05, 2022, 04:32:43 PM »
I think the most likely future for years is the bolded one. Putin will execute this script (no-one of his advisor would mention problems you see there). Will continue to bring more solders until whole Ukraine under control.
Putin will declare the end of the "operation". The world would disagree.  And putin will continue to fight the Ukrainians gorrilas.

Then he continues with Moldavia, Latvia etc. Until someone "replaces" him internally, or something very horrible happens.
Latvia is NATO meaning US joins the war with the rest of NATO.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Putin has started to talk about sanctions being "akin to an act of war", so he's started laying the groundwork for a further "defensive invasion".

That is also my understanding of his words.

dang1

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 528
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #415 on: March 05, 2022, 04:42:27 PM »
..
[/quote]
Putin has started to talk about sanctions being "akin to an act of war", so he's started laying the groundwork for a further "defensive invasion".
[/quote]

we may finally find out, how good the F-22 Raptor really is, in air-to-air combat

pecunia

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2974
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #416 on: March 05, 2022, 05:03:39 PM »
Providing, he doesn't use nukes, he'll get his a** kicked.  I doubt whether the Chinese will back him up.

Rural

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5093
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #417 on: March 05, 2022, 05:42:49 PM »
Providing, he doesn't use nukes, he'll get his a** kicked.


If the latter becomes clear to him, he'll use nukes.

Sibley

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8034
  • Location: Northwest Indiana
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #418 on: March 05, 2022, 05:46:49 PM »
Ok, yes, but look at the mess that is Russia's attack right now. Logistics are a mess, morale is a mess, equipment is old and in poor condition. Even if they have better troops and equipment elsewhere, the economy is collapsing from sanctions. The Russian people have fallen for the propaganda so far, but will that hold up to the cognitive dissonance between devastating sanctions and what Putin is telling them? It's possible that the brainwashing could start to develop cracks. Europe doesn't want to stop buying oil/gas right now, but if Putin attacks someone else that might change, and would be another massive blow to Putin. If invading Ukraine is unwinnable, then invading any NATO country is probably suicidal.

Even with nukes in the picture, I'm starting to wonder how much of that threat is a bluff. The fabled Russian army is so powerful, and yet look at Ukraine. What has the corruption that is so evident in the Russian army done to the nukes? The passage of time isn't kind to machinery - how old are these weapons? Have they been maintained, repaired? What about the launch sites? I hope that the military knows, or someone is taking steps to find out. If it turns out that the nukes are largely useless that changes the situation.

As for China, they have a healthy regard for their own interests. If being cozy with Russia is going to hurt too much they'll back off. I doubt they want to face down NATO either.

Sibley

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8034
  • Location: Northwest Indiana
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #419 on: March 05, 2022, 06:03:10 PM »
Just saw this: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-russia-ukraine-war-zelensky-adviser/

In short, one of the guys who's been negotiating with Russia says that Russia is starting to feel the pinch, and discussions are starting to be constructive.

Travis

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4946
  • Location: California
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #420 on: March 05, 2022, 06:06:19 PM »
I have a really dumb and possibly insensitive question.

What happens to Ukrainians who lose their homes through Russian shelling/bombing? Those bombed out apartment buildings--were they state owned? Or did civilians own them? Insurance doesn't cover acts of war, I think (I did some googling). Are they just SOL?

The situation of the refugees is very sad when watched on the news, but I'm trying to think through the full implications of what is happening to them. Am I correct in assuming they are essentially losing everything except whatever they have in the bank?
President Zelensky has promised to rebuild with reparations from Russia.  I'm not sure how realistic that is, and the precedent after WWI of requiring reparations from Germany is not a happy one.

But there are very significant sums being confiscated from the assets of Russian billionaires held outside Russia.  Depending on the laws of the country doing the confiscating those sums might be returned to Ukraine for rebuilding.

After WWII the UK government compensated those who had lost property through German bombing.  But it took years to pay the compensation and decades to do the rebuilding - there were bomb sites where no reconstruction had taken place well into the 1960s, and arguably the shortage of housing caused through wartime losses has left us behind the curve in house building ever since and so contributed to current high costs.

I think it's highly likely that a significant proportion of the people leaving Ukraine because of the war will not go back for many years, if ever, so depopulation  may be a factor too - although that could make economic recovery even harder.

I don't think we'll see a shortage of international reconstruction aid.  If this all ends in Ukraine's favor, the victory lap will be "welcome to the EU. Here's $Billions in new homes, highways, bridges, and weapons."

I think something's changed in Ukraine. And I'm basing this solely on Zelenky's videos. I've been watching them as we go, I've watched all of them but one (can't find a translation). There's been a progression, a pattern. The parts directed towards the Ukrainians have been consistent: praising the military for fighting, praising people for volunteering to fight, praising people for helping in the war effort. Keeping people's spirits up, giving them hope, etc.

Well, he posted a new video about 2 hours ago, the English subtitles one about an hour ago. And this one is very different. He's calling on the people to fight. All of them, in big or little ways. He's appealing to the people in the Donbas region as well.

I don't know what's changed, but something has. Something with the war, or something with their strategy.

I think that the NATO's refusal for the no fly zone disappointed him and damped his spirit. I think he was counting on that.

Now he really feels that no-one from outside will help (directly) and the outlook is not looking good.
He i guess was hoping on some quickish "clean" resolution of the conflict. But now sees that the war will be dragged for years, relying on the future gorilla tactics.

In my opinion that was too much to ask NATO for such no fly zone, too dangerous for the whole world.


He's been on a media blitz to get NATO to set up a no-fly, but that's just not going to happen. Hopefully yesterday's surface to air slaughter will raise his spirits about doing that part himself.



As for China, they have a healthy regard for their own interests. If being cozy with Russia is going to hurt too much they'll back off. I doubt they want to face down NATO either.

I think China was hoping for a quick invasion and annexation (and was probably promised one by Putin), but since that didn't happen they have no choice but to keep Russia at arm's length until this is over. They're probably as stunned as the rest of the world how this war is turning out, and going back to the drawing board for their Taiwan plans.

maizefolk

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7560
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #421 on: March 05, 2022, 06:24:51 PM »
Even with nukes in the picture, I'm starting to wonder how much of that threat is a bluff. The fabled Russian army is so powerful, and yet look at Ukraine. What has the corruption that is so evident in the Russian army done to the nukes? The passage of time isn't kind to machinery - how old are these weapons? Have they been maintained, repaired? What about the launch sites? I hope that the military knows, or someone is taking steps to find out. If it turns out that the nukes are largely useless that changes the situation.

When it comes to nukes "largely" useless doesn't do it after the great excesses of the cold war. Even if 99.9% of the Russian nuclear arsenal were nonfunctional or on nonfunctional delivery systems, it would still leave Russia enough nukes to destroy Kyiv, Paris, Berlin, London, New York, and DC.*

The old cold war logic was based on having so many nuclear weapons distributed in so many places that even a first strike with 100s or 1000s of bombs would leave enough remaining weapons to destroy the other nation. Unfortunately the same logic that provides resilience to a nuclear first strike also provides resilience to poor maintenance, shoddy replacement parts, and indifferently trained operators.

The last two weeks have made me really start to appreciate how remarkable it is that folks of my parents generation came through the cold war and associated constant threats of nuclear annihilation without much worse and deeper psychological consequences. 

*Based on 6,000 known nuclear warheads as of early 2022, down from a peak of 45,000 in the '90s.

partgypsy

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5799
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #422 on: March 05, 2022, 06:43:53 PM »
Even with nukes in the picture, I'm starting to wonder how much of that threat is a bluff. The fabled Russian army is so powerful, and yet look at Ukraine. What has the corruption that is so evident in the Russian army done to the nukes? The passage of time isn't kind to machinery - how old are these weapons? Have they been maintained, repaired? What about the launch sites? I hope that the military knows, or someone is taking steps to find out. If it turns out that the nukes are largely useless that changes the situation.

When it comes to nukes "largely" useless doesn't do it after the great excesses of the cold war. Even if 99.9% of the Russian nuclear arsenal were nonfunctional or on nonfunctional delivery systems, it would still leave Russia enough nukes to destroy Kyiv, Paris, Berlin, London, New York, and DC.*

The old cold war logic was based on having so many nuclear weapons distributed in so many places that even a first strike with 100s or 1000s of bombs would leave enough remaining weapons to destroy the other nation. Unfortunately the same logic that provides resilience to a nuclear first strike also provides resilience to poor maintenance, shoddy replacement parts, and indifferently trained operators.

The last two weeks have made me really start to appreciate how remarkable it is that folks of my parents generation came through the cold war and associated constant threats of nuclear annihilation without much worse and deeper psychological consequences. 

*Based on 6,000 known nuclear warheads as of early 2022, down from a peak of 45,000 in the '90s.
.   My ex and his friends in late 80s threw an art show called "Fuck the Bomb", anti war art show. One of the pieces was where a light would flash and your shadow would be fixed on the wall, and slowly fade, similar to shadows seen in Hiroshima after the blast. Dr strange love  is a great movie detail the sureealness of the cold war.

Blender Bender

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #423 on: March 05, 2022, 08:45:05 PM »
Updated Ukrainian military tactics:
https://apple.news/AOULtBbPXQNivm3_fJIsbcQ

kenmoremmm

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 720
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #424 on: March 05, 2022, 08:45:34 PM »
The US should give up its nukes. If we cannot engage Russia because of M.A.D., then what good is having the world’s mightiest military? What happens when China takes the same strategy as Russia? Sanctions are fine and good, but they will not prevent things like this from happening.

As it sits now, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is a sitting target. We can probably begin the countdown for when his death is announced. Meanwhile, the west and its partners are sitting back and waiting for it to happen. This man has shown incredible bravery and leadership and has instantly become a global icon as someone who will stand up to the bad guys and protect democracy. Perhaps the west is using him as a pawn in the game – a necessary sacrifice to justify the next steps. Or, perhaps he will just be another one of the senseless casualties of this war and that will be that. Only time will tell what the true answer is, but I do not believe he should be a sacrifice in this war game calculation

I believe we should be proactive in this situation. Russia has more-or-less preemptively declared war against any country that supports Ukraine. If we collectively say no to this kind of behavior, it will serve as a turning point for this and future wars. If we allow this to pass and allow Putin’s military to take down city after city until there are none left in Ukraine, we can mark this point in history as the turning point for 21st century imperialism. Only this time will the imperialist countries be able to tout nuclear weapons as the ultimate justification to prevent resistance.
After decades of the US decline as the beacon of hope for the world, this is the chance for it to redeem itself. This is the WWII moment of modern day. This is the chance to hopefully reunite Americans behind a common cause. As it stands today, the Russian army is in a position to get obliterated by a small series airstrike by the US and its partners. The longer we wait, the harder this gets. Do we really want to let this war simmer for the next 10 years of infighting? Is the goal to outlast Putin so that hopefully his successor sees the light of day and pulls out?

Putting this altogether, it does not seems like the west is playing the long game very well. We are past due for imposing all available sanctions. Sanctions should be made permanent. Assets should be seized and liquidated. Oil and gas should be at the top of the sanctions list. There is no more time to pussyfoot around this.
Unless the US and the nuclear powers around the world that supposedly support democracy want to become imperialist countries themselves, they might as well give up their nukes now so there is a way to at least engage the powerful enemies in the world, because as this 2022 war is showing us, having a nuclear deterrent for the “good guys” isn’t actually a deterrent; it’s a hindrance.

Taran Wanderer

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1609
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #425 on: March 05, 2022, 10:51:01 PM »
I was so angry tonight after reading the latest news of Zelensky's heroics and Russia's atrocities.  I'm ready to go.  Why shouldn't Zelensky formally request (again) military support from willing countries, and those countries, including the USA, move into Ukraine and make it known to Russia that they need to move out?  Establish a no-fly zone, go in on the ground from the west, and steadily move east.  The option for Russia is to leave before shots are fired, or don't leave and be destroyed.  Put the full weight of the nuclear arsenal behind it.  Say that we will not stand by while a totalitarian regime invades a democracy, and then prove it.

And then formally recognize Taiwan and tell the Chinese to f--- themselves, too.

LennStar

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4341
  • Location: Germany
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #426 on: March 06, 2022, 02:37:39 AM »
I think something's changed in Ukraine. [...]

I don't know what's changed, but something has. Something with the war, or something with their strategy.

The Russians have changed their approach. They are now doing a real war, the Russian way. Means the aforementioned bombing and intentionally killing of civilians.

This "special operation" was intended by Putin to be a short "Free the Country!" holiday for his troops. Now it's a real war. And the enemy will be squashed by all means.

pecunia

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2974
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #427 on: March 06, 2022, 07:39:11 AM »
In the days of World War 1, the Russian soldiers fought the Europeans.  Their military was not too good.  They served under officers they didn't respect.   Mistakes were made.  At the end of the war, they went home and made changes.

Here are a people with many that can speak their language.  The Russians cannot help but see how valiantly they fight for their freedom.  Is it possible that this war will put the germ of an idea in their heads that they can change their own society for the better?

I saw a Netflix program of how the Ukrainian people made the Russian puppet leader, Viktor Yanukovych. flee in 2014.  You couldn't fake this.  Those people are brave.  They've been fighting the Russians a long time now.  The show gave the impression that all the people pulled together to make it happen.  Apparently, they haven't lost those qualities shown in the film. (Winter on Fire)

The Ukrainians claim to have killed 10,000 Russians.  There were 15,000 Soviets killed in Afghanistan.  At least some of those Russian soldiers must wonder as to why they are really doing this fighting.

lemanfan

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1277
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #428 on: March 06, 2022, 08:37:16 AM »
In the last twenty years, the 9/11 attacks have appeared in at least half a dozen American fiction books I've read.  It was clearly a big trauma for the USA and it's citizens. 

For many in Europe - not just Ukraine - I think this war will be much more important than 9/11 decades from now.  This is when the world changed DRASTICLY for us, again.  I spoke to my dad this weekend and he told me how he was called into the military up here in Sweden when the Warsaw pact tanks rolled into Czechoslovakia back in 1968 - he must have been 23 at the time.  He asked me to where I'd go if the Russians attack Sweden now - assuming he'd be to old to go somewhere and I should save myself and run overseas. I had no answer to that question. I still do not have an answer.


maizefolk

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7560
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #429 on: March 06, 2022, 08:53:20 AM »
In the last twenty years, the 9/11 attacks have appeared in at least half a dozen American fiction books I've read.  It was clearly a big trauma for the USA and it's citizens. 

For many in Europe - not just Ukraine - I think this war will be much more important than 9/11 decades from now.  This is when the world changed DRASTICLY for us, again.  I spoke to my dad this weekend and he told me how he was called into the military up here in Sweden when the Warsaw pact tanks rolled into Czechoslovakia back in 1968 - he must have been 23 at the time.  He asked me to where I'd go if the Russians attack Sweden now - assuming he'd be to old to go somewhere and I should save myself and run overseas. I had no answer to that question. I still do not have an answer.

Looking at it from the far side of the Atlantic, I cannot really understand what it feels like for folks in Europe, but I can tell -- particularly for folks in western europe* -- it is an experience that is changing people's whole perspective on the world they live in.

The analogy to September 11th is a frightening one though. When hundreds of millions of people who thought they were safe are suddenly afraid for their safety, and the safety of their loved ones it is possible for them to make rapid changes to the world they live in for the better or the worse. I just hope you folks can learn some lessons from the mistakes we in the USA made in the decade after that attack.

*I work with one guy from Poland, whose whole family and fiance still live there, and while he's clearly worried for them he doesn't seem to be shaken to his core in the same way as the folks I know from countries farther west. I think because either he personally, or poland in general, always considered what Russia is doing to Ukraine to be a possible part of their own future rather than something that was completely unthinkable in the modern era.

Blender Bender

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #430 on: March 06, 2022, 09:27:30 AM »
There is an interesting book, released 2010.
https://www.amazon.ca/Next-100-Years-Forecast-Century/dp/0767923057

The author George Friedman quite accurately describes the future of the world.
Some of the points:
1. The whole threat to the west from middle east (Sept 11) will disappear.
2. Russia will try to restore its imperium (as i recall in 2020ties).
3. West will unite and defeat russia.
4. Turkey, Japan will rise to become major regional (super) powers.
5. Poland becomes the key to stop russia.
6. Interestingly, he foresee Germany going downwards...
7. China collapses internally.

lemanfan

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1277
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #431 on: March 06, 2022, 09:36:35 AM »
Do remember that it's only 33 years since the fall of the Berlin Wall, and all the changes that followed in the few years thereafter.  USSR collapsed in 1991.  I remember these times clearly as I was in the end of high school and my first year of university at the time. 

YttriumNitrate

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1945
  • Location: Northwest Indiana
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #432 on: March 06, 2022, 10:04:59 AM »
The US should give up its nukes. If we cannot engage Russia because of M.A.D., then what good is having the world’s mightiest military? What happens when China takes the same strategy as Russia? Sanctions are fine and good, but they will not prevent things like this from happening.
I'm guessing that right now Ukraine really wishes they hadn't given up their nukes.

Imma

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3193
  • Location: Europe
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #433 on: March 06, 2022, 10:29:19 AM »
Well @Blender Bender good thing Friedman doesn't foresee WWIII until Thanksgiving 2050, and it will happen between most of the Western world + China against the UK, Japan and Germany. I think for the early 2020s Friedman has predicted the total collapse of both Russia and China instead.

Seriously though, there are some interesting ideas in Friedman's work. But as they say, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

@maizefolk I'm not sure if it's that different for Western Europeans as opposed to Eastern Europeans. Of course, we are much more sheltered from the consequences - 1,5 million Ukrainian people have already fled into neighbouring countries and only a small percentage of them have travelled on to Western Europe. Although it still feels like quite a lot - in one week, dozens of Ukrainian families have arrived in my city already. But, as a Western Europeans, I think we've always had that idea that the Russians were out to get us.

It wasn't too long ago that the Iron Curtain was a couple of hours driving away from the North Sea. Of course, we don't have the experience of living in an Eastern Bloc country that people in, say, Poland have, but I was born a little bit before the collapse of the Berlin Wall, in the Netherlands, and the idea of "the Russians are coming" has always been in the back of my mind. Tensions between Europe and Russia pre-date the Cold War. No one remembers when Russia wasn't a threat. It's always been a when, not an if.

That's very different than my experience of 9/11 (as a European, and still in highschool when it happened, so maybe my experience is flawed). One big issue about 9/11 is that no one saw it coming. The western world was suddenly under attack by an enemy that no one knew they had.

I have a friend from a former Eastern Bloc country who has lived here for a very long time. They've been thinking about potentially moving back home for years but one thing that has stopped them that it's much more dangerous to live there when the Russians come.

@lemanfan Yes, I do believe that this is something that will change our lives for the long-term. In that sense it's a lot like 9/11. I remember having a conversation with a relative when Russia first invaded Ukraine, and we discussed whether in hindsight we'd say that's where WWIII started. We may have been right.

My personal plan has been the Dutch overseas territories for a while (Scandinavia is my climate refugee back-up plan, but too close to Russia right now). The Dutch overseas territories are too remote to be an interesting target for attack by anyone and, being located in the Carribean, an excellent spot to either stay for a longer period or travel on to Canada or the US. Those have always been the traditional safe havens for Europeans since they're just too big to be invaded by a foreign army.

When WWII happened, a lot of wealthy people fled to the UK (and from there some travelled to the US or Canada) from the Netherlands in spring 1940. When Germany invaded in May, for a couple of days people were able to get out of the country, but it would have been extremely hard. After a few days the Germans made that impossible. Physically, due to disability I'm not able to stay and fight for my country. If something happens, I want to be able to get out, and I want to make sure I can get out while I still can. That's why I like having access to money and credit cards in case I have to urgently pack my bags. I have enough money to pay for all of my loved ones to get out.

Blender Bender

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #434 on: March 06, 2022, 10:52:33 AM »
@Imma
The book is more about understanding the geopolitical forces.
Even the author is clear that his forecasted events should not be taken verbatim.

partgypsy

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5799
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #435 on: March 06, 2022, 12:15:39 PM »
Someone said it would become more apparent who the Russia assets are. This looks like one. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/former-trump-official-called-ukrainian-president-zelensky-a-puppet-2022-3%3famp
« Last Edit: March 06, 2022, 04:30:21 PM by partgypsy »

waltworks

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5883
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #436 on: March 06, 2022, 12:21:20 PM »
Assuming the Oryx numbers are at least in the ballpark, Russian losses are pretty shockingly high (~800 confirmed major pieces of equipment, probably much more than that in reality). Can they sustain this for very long, or am I falling victim to confirmation bias because I want Ukraine to win?

-W

RunningintoFI

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 162
  • Paid to optimize. Love not to.
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #437 on: March 06, 2022, 12:37:06 PM »
The US should give up its nukes. If we cannot engage Russia because of M.A.D., then what good is having the world’s mightiest military? What happens when China takes the same strategy as Russia? Sanctions are fine and good, but they will not prevent things like this from happening.

As it sits now, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is a sitting target. We can probably begin the countdown for when his death is announced. Meanwhile, the west and its partners are sitting back and waiting for it to happen. This man has shown incredible bravery and leadership and has instantly become a global icon as someone who will stand up to the bad guys and protect democracy. Perhaps the west is using him as a pawn in the game – a necessary sacrifice to justify the next steps. Or, perhaps he will just be another one of the senseless casualties of this war and that will be that. Only time will tell what the true answer is, but I do not believe he should be a sacrifice in this war game calculation

I believe we should be proactive in this situation. Russia has more-or-less preemptively declared war against any country that supports Ukraine. If we collectively say no to this kind of behavior, it will serve as a turning point for this and future wars. If we allow this to pass and allow Putin’s military to take down city after city until there are none left in Ukraine, we can mark this point in history as the turning point for 21st century imperialism. Only this time will the imperialist countries be able to tout nuclear weapons as the ultimate justification to prevent resistance.
After decades of the US decline as the beacon of hope for the world, this is the chance for it to redeem itself. This is the WWII moment of modern day. This is the chance to hopefully reunite Americans behind a common cause. As it stands today, the Russian army is in a position to get obliterated by a small series airstrike by the US and its partners. The longer we wait, the harder this gets. Do we really want to let this war simmer for the next 10 years of infighting? Is the goal to outlast Putin so that hopefully his successor sees the light of day and pulls out?

Putting this altogether, it does not seems like the west is playing the long game very well. We are past due for imposing all available sanctions. Sanctions should be made permanent. Assets should be seized and liquidated. Oil and gas should be at the top of the sanctions list. There is no more time to pussyfoot around this.
Unless the US and the nuclear powers around the world that supposedly support democracy want to become imperialist countries themselves, they might as well give up their nukes now so there is a way to at least engage the powerful enemies in the world, because as this 2022 war is showing us, having a nuclear deterrent for the “good guys” isn’t actually a deterrent; it’s a hindrance.

To your point about getting rid of nuclear weapons, the United States actually tried to do this during the 1980s/1990s with the START treaty with USSR/Russian Federation.  And it was European & Japanese allies who kindly asked the United States not to get rid of the nuclear umbrella under which they have been protected from adversaries far closer to their shores.   

It is also important to note that we do not know what wars nuclear weapons have prevented over the last 8 decades.  It seems likely that a third global war was avoided due to their existence and may yet still be prevented because of their presence. 

Sibley

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8034
  • Location: Northwest Indiana
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #438 on: March 06, 2022, 01:42:47 PM »
Assuming the Oryx numbers are at least in the ballpark, Russian losses are pretty shockingly high (~800 confirmed major pieces of equipment, probably much more than that in reality). Can they sustain this for very long, or am I falling victim to confirmation bias because I want Ukraine to win?

-W

No clue. But, there is at least one video of a Russian train sending equipment to Ukraine - and it had very obviously civilian vehicles on it. Now, maybe there's a good reason to send minivans and delivery trucks instead of military vehicles, but it's not exactly a good look.

SunnyDays

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3729
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #439 on: March 06, 2022, 03:38:19 PM »
Assuming the Oryx numbers are at least in the ballpark, Russian losses are pretty shockingly high (~800 confirmed major pieces of equipment, probably much more than that in reality). Can they sustain this for very long, or am I falling victim to confirmation bias because I want Ukraine to win?

-W

No clue. But, there is at least one video of a Russian train sending equipment to Ukraine - and it had very obviously civilian vehicles on it. Now, maybe there's a good reason to send minivans and delivery trucks instead of military vehicles, but it's not exactly a good look.

Park them in residential areas and blow them up, like other terrorists have been known to do?

partgypsy

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5799
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #440 on: March 06, 2022, 04:32:03 PM »
Assuming the Oryx numbers are at least in the ballpark, Russian losses are pretty shockingly high (~800 confirmed major pieces of equipment, probably much more than that in reality). Can they sustain this for very long, or am I falling victim to confirmation bias because I want Ukraine to win?

-W

No clue. But, there is at least one video of a Russian train sending equipment to Ukraine - and it had very obviously civilian vehicles on it. Now, maybe there's a good reason to send minivans and delivery trucks instead of military vehicles, but it's not exactly a good look.

Park them in residential areas and blow them up, like other terrorists have been known to do?

Isn't it part of war rules to have your war equipment clearly marked what side you are on? I could be mistaken. 

Radagast

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2790
  • One Does Not Simply Work Into Mordor
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #441 on: March 06, 2022, 04:33:54 PM »
Assuming the Oryx numbers are at least in the ballpark, Russian losses are pretty shockingly high (~800 confirmed major pieces of equipment, probably much more than that in reality). Can they sustain this for very long, or am I falling victim to confirmation bias because I want Ukraine to win?

-W
I am also thinking that they cannot sustain for very long. There have been several points in the timeline where I thought the Russians would lose badly, and at each point I thought they would lose sooner than I did before.
1. When Ukrainians started holding patriotic demonstrations before the war began
2. When Russia failed to attain any meaningful objectives within three days
3. When every Western country announced arms shipments and sanctions (and you can bet some did things they did not announce)
4. Around yesterday, when the Russians had not made any more meaningful gains

I still think the darkest days are still in front of us though. I have been thinking that Putin's army's greatest advantage would be after 14 days, at which point they will have destroyed all Ukrainian equipment they could easily destroy and advanced as far as they can advance. Then they will be facing all that they could not easily destroy, tied down, and with a constant stream of highly capable portable weapons from NATO that will never cease. It doesn't seem like they have really been conquering Ukraine so much as driving though.

So what happens when their military offensive becomes unsustainable? I think there are four options.
Negotiated truce Putin would not let happen
strategic retreat Putin would not let happen
Massive reinforcement
Massive clusterfuck

I am leaning toward the latter, and I think the 3-6 weeks of the war will become increasingly bad for Putin.

Also Putin decisively lost the propaganda war yesterday be deliberately killing fleeing civilians and telling Ukraine to let him destroy them, or else he would destroy them. Now everybody in the country will think there is no choice but to fight.

I too hope I am not a victim of wishful thinking and confirmation bias.

PeteD01

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #442 on: March 06, 2022, 04:41:33 PM »
Delusional russian leadership: an abandoned Russian convoy transporting, among other things, police riot gear.
For what?  To control the enthusiastic crowds celebrating their liberation?
They for sure had it all figured out.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1500156105967685633
« Last Edit: March 06, 2022, 05:51:16 PM by PeteD01 »

Travis

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4946
  • Location: California
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #443 on: March 06, 2022, 04:41:58 PM »
Assuming the Oryx numbers are at least in the ballpark, Russian losses are pretty shockingly high (~800 confirmed major pieces of equipment, probably much more than that in reality). Can they sustain this for very long, or am I falling victim to confirmation bias because I want Ukraine to win?

-W

No clue. But, there is at least one video of a Russian train sending equipment to Ukraine - and it had very obviously civilian vehicles on it. Now, maybe there's a good reason to send minivans and delivery trucks instead of military vehicles, but it's not exactly a good look.

Park them in residential areas and blow them up, like other terrorists have been known to do?

Those are convoy replacements for sure. There's already video of civilian vehicles with big white Zs taking part in supply convoys and getting ambushed. 

Oryx's website is entirely based on what has been photographed so whatever he posts is confirmed, but also the bare minimum. A train full of military vehicles was spotted on the Trans-Siberian railroad moving west, so they're pulling equipment from other commands. When we need to replace combat losses we dip into depots of equipment that can be made ready in a few days. We don't strip other active units.  Rumor has it that Russian depots look more like junk yards.  Reserves are being called up as personnel replacements, and they're trying to pull in Syrian and Belorussian proxies.

Assuming the Oryx numbers are at least in the ballpark, Russian losses are pretty shockingly high (~800 confirmed major pieces of equipment, probably much more than that in reality). Can they sustain this for very long, or am I falling victim to confirmation bias because I want Ukraine to win?

-W

No clue. But, there is at least one video of a Russian train sending equipment to Ukraine - and it had very obviously civilian vehicles on it. Now, maybe there's a good reason to send minivans and delivery trucks instead of military vehicles, but it's not exactly a good look.

Park them in residential areas and blow them up, like other terrorists have been known to do?

Isn't it part of war rules to have your war equipment clearly marked what side you are on? I could be mistaken. 

Geneva Convention says that you have to wear a uniform. It doesn't specify equipment. The white painted markings are to differentiate Russian and Ukrainian vehicles since they use the same stuff. You'll also see individual soldiers with colored tape around their arms since their uniforms are nearly the same as well.

Travis

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4946
  • Location: California
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #444 on: March 06, 2022, 04:46:16 PM »

Also Putin decisively lost the propaganda war yesterday be deliberately killing fleeing civilians and telling Ukraine to let him destroy them, or else he would destroy them. Now everybody in the country will think there is no choice but to fight.



Russian government trying to claim the Ukrainians fired on their own nuclear power plant, that they're hiding American biological weapons factories, that we were helping them develop nuclear weapons (cause those are easy to hide), and that Turkish forces are in Ukraine directly fighting. The evidence for the former is a random laptop on a desk. The evidence for the latter is a bunch Radio Shack parts and a grenade spread neatly over a Turkish flag.

It would be funny if not for the fact that Russia has turned into North Korea with its control of the media. Most links to the outside world have been blocked.

LaineyAZ

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1371
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #445 on: March 06, 2022, 04:50:57 PM »
As one Sunday news panelist put it, this war could end in a draw because it's not Ukraine vs. Russia, it's Ukraine and allies vs. Russia. 

Or, Russia could "conquer" Ukraine but not be able to occupy it ala the U.S. in Afghanistan and Iraq.  Ukranian sniper attacks, bombs and other guerilla warfare could see Russia slink away in a few years but let it declare some kind of phony victory. 

Sibley

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8034
  • Location: Northwest Indiana
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #446 on: March 06, 2022, 05:07:10 PM »
Assuming the Oryx numbers are at least in the ballpark, Russian losses are pretty shockingly high (~800 confirmed major pieces of equipment, probably much more than that in reality). Can they sustain this for very long, or am I falling victim to confirmation bias because I want Ukraine to win?

-W

No clue. But, there is at least one video of a Russian train sending equipment to Ukraine - and it had very obviously civilian vehicles on it. Now, maybe there's a good reason to send minivans and delivery trucks instead of military vehicles, but it's not exactly a good look.

Park them in residential areas and blow them up, like other terrorists have been known to do?

Isn't it part of war rules to have your war equipment clearly marked what side you are on? I could be mistaken.

Don't know about the war rules (assuming Russia cares about those), but the video I saw the vehicles seemed to have big white "Z"'s on the sides. So that would be a marker.

Radagast

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2790
  • One Does Not Simply Work Into Mordor
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #447 on: March 06, 2022, 05:13:00 PM »
I forgot the other way Putin is losing the propaganda war: Ukraine is free to publicize as much as possible all Russian losses. Russia cannot reciprocate because it will destroy their easy victorious war of liberation message. Thus the propaganda war structurally favors Ukraine on all levels.

Nate79

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 146
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #448 on: March 06, 2022, 05:31:40 PM »
I hope Western companies learn their lesson from this and make permanent decisions to not do business in Russia until major reforms take place. But I doubt it.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


Sibley

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8034
  • Location: Northwest Indiana
Re: Ukraine
« Reply #449 on: March 06, 2022, 06:11:09 PM »
Ok, this is interesting. Crazy? Weird? Something.

On Twitter, one of the big hacker accounts is DeepNetAnon. She (as stated by the user) posted tonight that Russia is planning to disconnect the entire country from the global internet by March 11th. As support, there's screenshots of a government communication, mostly in Russian but the last is in English.

https://twitter.com/AnonymissInfo/status/1500630284227784706

If true, that will be interesting. It would certainly make hacking attempts more difficult. And it would isolate the Russian people from contact with the outside world.