Here in the UK employers have to provide a minimum of 20 days, on top of that we have 8 bank holidays every year so the least any person can have off in a year would be 28 days. Many employers offer more than this though if you have a decent job, in the past I have had as many as 33 days a year plus 8 days bank holidays it was pretty insane!! I only stayed there for 18 months but I remember the 3 months up to Christmas booking 2 days off a week every week in the run up, I can tell you it was an amazing Christmas I could thoroughly enjoy with family and friends but it was hard coming back to work :(
I am not sure how I could manage if I only had 10 days or even less every year but I guess you get in the swing of things and I think some jobs pay slightly higher in the States as opposed to here in the UK (might be wrong?). I would definitely be more picky about who I worked for though, the job satisfaction would have to be high to spend that much time every year working.
Do you remember the Puritans and Oliver Cromwell and all that from your English history? They're still alive and kickin' over here on this side of the Atlantic. Idle hands are the devil's workshop.
Haha it certainly wasn’t easy in the past! I am not necessarily against working longer hours especially if the role is stimulating/challenging or something I am passionate about. I have worked 60+ hours a week on challenging projects and even though there was some burnout at the end you do get a sense of achievement at the end of it (sometimes a career boost). I have also worked mindless jobs which haven’t been particularly challenging or stressful and bizarrely I have found these jobs to be worse than when I am stressed or challenged, even if they have better pay/benefits! I think there is definitely a perfect balance to be had between overworked and burnout and having an extremely low stress job that is simply boring.
I think the perfect balance is to be very slightly overworked/challenged but not to the point where the world is on your shoulders (this can be a trip down Alices rabbit hole though if you aren't careful).
It is hard to say, I think as Mustachians we have a naturally built in engine which powers us to be productive in all aspects of our lives including whilst we are working. Many of us would probably prefer more free time (who wouldnt) we are equally driven to push ourselves and I think this can naturally lead to burnout especially if you are rewarded monetarily (how many years would this knock off the retirement date?).
Maybe a question worth thinking about 'is this extra stress worth reaching my goal slightly quicker?'
You're missing an element.
There are two types of stress, healthy stress and unhealthy stress.
Burnout tends to come from unhealthy stress.
Also, burnout doesn't just come from a job alone, no one burns out from work alone, they burnout from the combination of tolls in their life.
So yes, a 60-80 hour, high pressure job where there is little to no negative stress (excellent boss, lots of autonomy, fair outcomes for effort, etc), may be totally enjoyable, and if the person doesn't have kids, and has a spouse that picks up the slack at home, and is totally understanding, then that person may be highly stressed by their high pressure, high reward work.
The same job may be crushing to someone who is never getting enough time with their family or friends, who feels they can't stay on top of their nutrition, and never exercises, and is steadily experiencing more wear and tear from the overload. The job may not directly provide negative stress, but the life overload does.
Another job might be fewer hours, still interesting and challenging but less demanding. However, it has a toxic work environment, this job has very manageable positive stress, but unbearable negative stress.
Then there's the boring job. It has no positive stress, no satisfaction and meaning, but the constant boredom itself is a negative stress. So it may not have extreme negative stress, but it *only* has negative stress.
So yes, it is something to consider, but you have to consider the whole picture. It's not a case of stressful jobs vs non stressful jobs. It's more dynamic than that.
I personally do well in extremely high good stress jobs, and I can handle highly toxic environments, as long as I have near total.autonomy and a mandate to try and fix the toxicity. I have an enormous capacity for burden, but a near zero capacity for a toxic or ineffectual management structure.
I know this about myself, so I know what kind of challenges to take on and what kind to avoid.