@Daley Would love your advice.
I currently have a 9 year-old T Mobile flipphone I've been very content with on a grandfathered prepaid plan I spend $25 a year on and use <250 minutes a year. I use Google Voice for most calls/texts from home or mostly use my husband's smartphone when we're out (he uses Google Fi).
However, this winter we moved to a new home where the T Mobile reception is terrible.
Okay
@mushroom, I'm gonna stop you right here, 'cause we need some
serious coverage clarification. Thanks to
@HarbingerofBunnies, I saw your post in your journal, and between that and your opening paragraph? We gotta put the brakes to this train and determine exactly what is what, and clarify a few things.
Buckle up, this'll be a long one with
a lot of information. Read. Re-read. Be willing to ask questions. There will be technical jargon, but don't get lost in understanding the specifics if you don't - focus instead on the clear implications I've made about how these technical details impact you. The most potentially confusing technical jargon will be detailing specific radio frequencies and phone network standards.
Bolded parts are basically the meat, everything else describes the why and how.
You say that T-Mobile coverage at your new place is terrible, but you're also using a phone that dates back to their 1900MHz 2G GSM era, maybe with
possible 3G UMTS service support on the 1700/2100MHz bands,
maybe with 1900MHz 3G as well. I don't know for certain, as I only have a phone age and not a specific model (not that it matters much). It's worth noting that
almost all of T-Mobile's 3G UMTS service on the 1700/2100MHz bands has been turned off, with the bandwidth re-farmed out for 4G LTE service outside of a small handful of markets. The same is actively being done with their remaining 3G UMTS 1900MHz service outside of a small handful of markets.
This means that outside of a minimum coverage 1900MHz 2G skeleton network they've promised to keep active for the time, there's not much left of T-Mobile's legacy network at this point. That is the tiny network you're using, and barely represents all of the T-Mobile network footprint.The all-in 4G LTE plan T-Mobile has been unfolding the past couple years has pretty well screwed
everyone with a phone older than about three years old and not built specifically (and T-Mobile branded) for receiving all of T-Mobile's new 4G LTE coverage and specifically has LTE band 12 voice support, which pretty much screws owners of nearly every single cheaper unbranded aftermarket, AT&T and Verizon unlocked handset used for voice calling on their network as well.
Again, this means your phone is only using a fraction of the T-Mobile network at this point due to aggressive planned obsolescence and network fragmentation. Fortunately, you're not alone in this problem. Now, this doesn't mean that you still can't be right about moving into a terrible T-Mobile coverage area, but this is a very important point to note all the same.
You can't determine your current T-Mobile coverage at your new house based on your decade old phone due to a lot of real technical and messy network rejiggering.Got it? Good. Let's keep going...
Now, you mentioned your husband uses Google Fi. Are you aware that Fi's primary home network is considered T-Mobile, and that as far as Sprint and US Mobile coverage is concerned, they're considered roaming networks? Do you know which network he's primarily using for coverage at your home and in your area? Is he still satisfied with Google Fi and has no desire to leave, or could he be persuaded off to another carrier? These are important questions to ask.
We need to determine if T-Mobile coverage at your home actually is terrible, or if it's just your phone; and we need to know how flexible your husband is willing to be to maximize savings for both mobile phones as there could be advantages to going multi-line setup depending on his average usage given how little you use.Next, let's just complicate things a little further and reference the post that brought you here to begin with. Republic Wireless. Republic used to be an awful proprietary VoIP over data "mobile" phone provider using Sprint's network first two generations of service, now they're just another privacy invasive T-Mobile MVNO offering WiFi calling and a gimmicky data billing model.
If Republic's billing model and WiFi calling fallback makes you swoon that much, Google Fi is the superior option, and a second line with Fi will cost about the same as a separate Republic line - and we're not even considering the incredibly terrible idea of just using a data-only SIM to share the data on the existing Fi account, use Google Voice over that data, and run the risk of being royally hosed not being able to call 911 in the case of an emergency; but it is an even cheaper option still if you really want to taunt Murphy and his law and ignore the sound advice of
paying for what you need.
The only difference is Google's handset selection is a bit more limited, partly because of how many mobile networks they roam onto.If T-Mo coverage is okay, and you just want/need WiFi calling as well, then that also opens up Ultra Mobile, Ting along with Consumer Cellular (using either of their T-Mobile SIM cards, though Ting and CC are only a good deal with two lines or more), and US Mobile (hopefully finally) going live itself with the feature sometime this year. You'll note, however, that the only MVNOs that offer "broad" WiFi calling support beyond
just iPhones... are T-Mobile based - whether they roam or not. Even if you venture off the guide's beaten path, you'll note that even MetroPCS offers WiFi calling, but MetroPCS is owned by - you guessed it - T-Mobile. You noticing a pattern here?
This means needing to buy one of the small assortment of T-Mobile VoLTE Band 12 certified handsets available that also support WiFi calling if you want better coverage than you got already with any T-Mo MVNO.So that brings us to the next two questions:
How important is WiFi calling to you, and do you understand that WiFi calling with any of these carriers is considered billed as part of your used minutes?I ask this because you originally were angling for Republic, and you mentioned WiFi calling at home. Clearly this seems to be an important feature for your husband, though it's hardly a necessary one even if a home phone is off the table (even a VoIP based one) so long as your primary mobile carrier provides sufficient coverage in your house. Proper UMA/GAN over
WiFi calling support on a phone is a beautiful thing, and a handy thing that I myself love and have used in the past with my trusty rusty Lumia 435, but it
is also a pretty unnecessary thing outside of Sprint and T-Mobile coverage maps unless you're deep in the belly of a building or only have 2G GSM voice and data coverage left with T-Mobile's network in your area due to the phone you own.
*cough-lumia-435-cough*We can keep talking plans and options here, but them's some questions and points to ponder that will greatly impact the quality of advice I can share.
My husband wants me to get a smartphone so that I can receive wifi calls at home (he especially wants to be able to call me when he's out) + in case of running into trouble when I'm out alone with our son. I am very directionally challenged so having access to maps and things is probably not a bad idea. My husband is very resistant to the idea of getting a landline.
It's a shame about his feelings on a home phone.
There's really cheap ways of integrating GV with VoIP/SIP service and ATA devices such as the Obi200 that even let you still get E911 service.If you must get a smartphone, it's not difficult to get offline maps for them anymore. No data usage required! Bonus savings.
This said, GPS drivers can frequently be dangerous because they turn off their brains and let the phone's voice prompts drive for them, which additionally diminishes their internal geographic memory and situational awareness. Take the time to actually study the paper maps of your area, learn the basics of navigation, and drive unassisted by GPS whenever possible. When and if you
do use GPS from this point, double up on your situational awareness and be willing to ignore its directions and yelling at you if it compromises your safety, which it inevitably will. If my 68 year old mother, who my father gave up on trying to teach her how to navigate decades ago (I might add), can learn to do it oldskool....
Do the world and your family a favor, don't become another GPS zombie driver.If you do anyway, understand that any cheap Android handset or tablet with a GPS chipset and enough offline storage for maps, even without a SIM card and service, can now act as an offline GPS for a lot cheaper than a dedicated Garmin.I leave my cell phone off most of the time because I like being untethered from electronic devices, especially if I'm outside. But I don't know how my relationship with my phone would change if I got a smartphone, if I would be drawn into using more apps and things and start using my phone all the time.
Oh, it will change unless you consciously make an effort against it. It will change rapidly, and for the worse. Give the book
Irresistible by Adam Alter a read, look over the attached infographic, and give the thread
@Syonyk started on
minimizing smartphone usage a read if you really want to go down the smartphone rabbit hole, which you will, if WiFi calling and GPS navigation are non-negotiables.
Right now what I envision is fairly low usage of minutes and data, but I probably do want to have access to data just in case. I wouldn't want anything like Facebook on my phone, but maybe I would find some other apps actually useful? This is kind of silly, but one friend is always texting me Bitmoji pictures and I want to be able to send some back too? I clearly don't know very much about this.
What would you recommend for a phone and/or plan? Maybe something that I could incorporate pretty well with Google Voice and not feel like I have to have my phone with me all the time?
Regarding Bitmoji, don't let it draw you in. Take a couple steps back from the app and ask yourself, "Is this service really necessary to enable effective communication, or is it just some stupid bauble spread through peer pressure that's designed to waste my time and mobile data and datamine the living daylights out of me?"
You seem to have a common thread about wanting to keep mostly technology free, stuff like this and smartphones are anathema to that position.On the table, if you seriously want to keep usage to a stark minimalist situation like you have in the past with a simple phone, is always Truphone SIM (assuming good AT&T network coverage in your area); which if you disable mobile data except for absolute emergencies and MMS, could keep you in line with your past mobile costs and give you both AT&T and T-Mobile coverage as well as potential international roaming, even with a smartphone set with extreme discipline and anti-mobile data prejudice. It would also let you keep using a newer, carrier unlocked domestic 850/1900MHz (such as AT&T's ZTE 223 flip phone,
carrier unlocked) or international 850/900/1800/1900MHz (such as AT&T's LG B470 flip phone, again
carrier unlocked) 3G UMTS feature phone while still offering excellent coverage. AT&T is looking to be the last network to let you do that with reasonable coverage in this nation as everyone else is slowly shutting down and forcing customers over to 4G VoLTE services for phone calls, which means no more actual weeks long battery life feature phones.
You can always have your Google Voice calls and texts forwarded to the phone.
Even if your phone doesn't support a GV/Hangouts app, you can still integrate surprisingly well by using GV's call/text forwarding functions and the callback numbers attached to those texts. You can also set up GV with a calling-card style autodialer as well for outbound calls where you don't have the contact's "alternate" GV callback number. It's a lot easier with a shorter list of contacts, but still doable. It's how I handle GV contacts on my Windows Phone without skipping a beat.
Of course, beyond that, you're going to be looking at spending at least $10/month most places anymore for a mobile line. At that point and given so many of the existing priorities without other knowledge and a firm entrenching in the Googleplex given both your entanglement with them already... no matter how much I want to scream on a mountaintop and tell you to run away or coach you through a whole mess of options after you answer the above questions,
a second line with Fi is probably your best - though not cheapest - choice. That also pretty well dictates what sort of phone to buy as well.
There's two obvious options here, though. One that you'd probably be happy with, and another that your husband would prefer. One will take a $40 or less phone and maybe $30/year to run. The other a $250+ phone and $15/month to run. One that mostly leaves your life unchanged. One that could transform your life. There's middle ground as well, but it just complicates things further. Let me know if I can help or clarify anything, and do let me know what you decide.