I understand why, if you are in what JL Collins refers to as the wealth preservation stage and have a portfolio with both stocks and bonds, you would want to rebalance on a regular basis. It also seems pretty clear that if you are in the wealth accumulation stage and are investing 100% in VTSAX there is no need to rebalance. So far so good.
But what about someone who is in the wealth accumulation stage and investing in a tax advantaged account (e.g. a 403(b)) who does not have access to VTSAX? JL Collins (
http://jlcollinsnh.com/2013/05/02/stocks-part-xvii-what-if-you-cant-buy-vtsax-or-even-vanguard/) draws attention to how the following mix would be roughly equivalent:
~81% Large cap (an S&P 500 fund)
~6% Mid cap
~13% Small cap
Two questions: (1) Given how heavily weighted the composition is towards large cap index funds, are the fees associated with rebalancing on a yearly basis (even in the absence of taxable events) worth it? (2) Couldn't one simply address any minor shifts amongst the three funds by simply altering how one makes new contributions (rather than selling existing assets)?
P.S. The plan I'm enrolled in through my employer doesn't even have a mid cap index.