Also:
"A follow-up inquiry about how the new order would be enforced indicated as much.
“We are relying on the good sense and cooperative spirit of Pennsylvanians to follow the Sec. of Health’s mask-wearing requirement order, and at this time law enforcement will not be charged with enforcing this latest order with citations for noncompliance,” the Health Department spokesperson, Nate Wardle, wrote in an email to PennLive"
Thanks for the added details
@chemistk . Your post motivated me to go back and look more closely at
Secretary Levine's actual order, which does state the exceptions you mentioned above.
For months, a neighbor has been encouraging everyone to "refuse to wear a mask!" He recommends we say, "I'm medical," when entering a business without a mask, and claims, "they can't refuse to let you in, otherwise you can sue them under the ADA." My neighbor has no
actual medical condition that I'm aware of. He's just exploiting the medical exception loophole. I think the government should indemnify businesses against ADA lawsuits. If a person really can't wear a mask, the government should provide them with some kind of accommodations. There are lots of unemployed people, right now. It wouldn't be that hard to find out of work high school or college students who would be willing to go shopping for people who were unable to do so themselves due to a medical condition.
A friend who works at a medical cannabis dispensary recently told me she has to endure daily verbal abuse from "patients" insisting on "their right" to enter her workplace without a mask. Apparently, her employer is doing the right thing to protect vulnerable patients and staff by requiring that everyone mask up before entering. IMO, businesses should NOT allow anyone not wearing a mask to enter enclosed spaces, even if they claim to have some mysterious medical condition that precludes their wearing a mask. In the case of cannabis, apparently, people want to have it badly enough that they're willing to put on a mask or else not go inside.
Other small businesses, however, aren't so lucky. If a grocery store, for example, required that people claiming to have medical conditions wear a mask to enter, people would just go to another store and, then, post all over social media about how bad the store requiring masks was. Civil penalties against businesses refusing to enforce social distancing seem
better than criminal penalties against individuals, but are still problematic, IMHO. Businesses are hurting, right now, and it's pretty unrealistic to expect that they be the social distancing enforcers. Ideally, individuals would be reasonable and just do the right thing voluntarily. Unfortunately, that's not the world we live in, at least not right now, with an election coming up in just a few months.