First, his gun wasn't out. He was armed and that was it. It was concealed in his waist.
Is that from an eyewitness report? Or is that from the defendant?
Trayvon sure fit the description of kids breaking into homes in the neighborhood. Was it him? Who knows, but he did have a checkered criminal history.
What description? George never said anything about a description to the dispatch. He said "We've had some break-ins in my neighborhood, and there's a real suspicious guy." He also said, "these assholes, they always get away."*
George had a legal right to follow. He was a resident. He was calling the cops.
Trayvon was also a resident or at least a guest of a resident. He had a right to be there as well. Was Trayvon's crime "Walking While Black"?
A person following you, while talking to the police, does not give you the right to attack them, beat them, and mount them.
Is that from an eyewitness account? Why wasn't Trayvon using self-defense? He was attacked by an aggressive wannabe cop who ignored the dispatch request to not follow the "suspect."
* Just a few weeks earlier, George waited for the police in a previous situation and the suspect, Burgess, got away before the police arrived. It stands to reason that George wasn't waiting around this time and decided to take the matter into his hands.
Burgess was arrested and charged shortly after he avoided police so while George didn't see the capture, the recent burglaries were solved.