I voted in the 0-10%, because our monthly mortgage payment is like 6% of net.
...BUT....
Maybe I've been watching too many city planning videos or whatever- does this even paint any kind of picture about what it costs to live where I do?
I mean, just for starters I have a $32k tractor/snowblower setup in the barn to keep my driveway open in the winter. That's 32% of what this house cost outright.
I used to live in a cabin that cost me $50k to buy. I always felt kind of smug about that when looking at what other people pay for housing. I felt even more smug about it when we recently sold it for $100k. LOOK HOW FINANCIALLY SMART I AM.
But it was 40 miles roundtrip from work. I lived there 17 years. Paying at least $7k/year in transportation costs. (See:
https://forum.mrmoneymustache.com/welcome-to-the-forum/adding-up-my-total-cost-of-car-ownership/). The cost of the house was almost almost negligible in the face of those numbers. SO FINANCIALLY SMART. :facepalm
So transportation costs are pretty intertwined with housing costs for many of us.
(Despite the tractor, my transportation costs are much better now that I can ride my bike most of the time.)
But maybe there are other costs too? I don't spend a whole ton on recreation and travel, because I've got tons of great things to do literally right in my own backyard. But if I hated where I lived or just felt the need to spend thousands of dollars on ski vacations because I couldn't ski at home, does that count in my housing cost as well?