I notice the smartphone has replaced the large tv as weapon of choice to beat the less fortunate
Actually, I haven't beaten anyone in days...are you volunteering? I'm tired today and not willing to chase you: so you'll have to stand still for it. ;-0
My point was valid: everyone chooses their own path. Their own priorities.
Personally, before I'd be evicted I would 'make do' with a pay-as-you-go flip phone. How do I know I could do this?
Because I'm doing it now on an ok wage.
And if I were homeless...would the first thing I spent a cash windfall on be a fancy freaking phone? I think not.
Hate me all you like, 2lazy2retire, but I advocate other things that I'm sure are unpopular with you and many others: before I'd give out welfare I would mandate drug testing.
I had to get it for my job. Why should someone get free money without having to adhere to the same standard? I would NOT advocate they be punished though, but I would vote for an out-patient clinic/wellness program or whatever...and they'd have to pee clean to get back on the free money ride.
The exception is kids: children have no say so in whether their parent is a drug addict or basic idiot so should not be penalized and SHOULD have WIC or whatever the food program/housing thing is.
I tend not to believe in large scale labels. To me the "poor" are people who don't have any pets.
Or have lost their sight: we live on such a beautiful planet I can't imagine not seeing it.
Or lost a limb in the military or at something stupid like the Boston bombing.
And I pity the poor, using my definition of it. But I don't define people who just haven't quite figured out money (YET) as poor. And it is YET, unless they're dead in which case it's a moot point. If they're alive, they could get a clue, buy a vowel...learn something helpful, tomorrow.
I also wish that AS we hand out free whatever programs, we at least make an attempt to educate these people in basic life skills.
<mounts unicorn, rides off into the sunset humming "somewhere, over the rainbow">