The online version of this article is entitled: "Older Americans Shun Retirement for Risky Startups."
The *paper* version of the article is entitled: "For many, the age of entrepreneurship begins at 65"
The first title seems more accurate and the second title seems misleading.
After I read this article, I got the sense that the people interviewed are playing roulette. This first guy has sunk everything he has into his business at an age when he may not earn it back:
"“It is a huge risk,” said Kinsey, now 67, owner of North Florida Medical Solutions Inc. in Gainesville.
“I have sunk everything I have into it the last two years. I have put myself out on the line.”
Older Americans such as Kinsey are increasingly shunning retirement to start companies because they see job opportunities limited after age 55,
don’t have enough savings to retire comfortably or want to work for themselves."
I know reporters can twist words around and have had it done to me, so maybe this next guy was more prepared than the reporter made him out to be. The way the article is written, it sounds like this guy didn't do his research (scary):
"Bruce Fischler, 63, of Plantation, Florida, lost a housing-related job in 2012 after home prices slid in the region and foreclosures surged.
He formed a drug company with the hopes of commercializing a university patent for a treatment for osteoporosis,
only to find that running clinical trials would take an “enormous amount of money,” which will probably be impossible to raise."
I feel bad for these folks. They could either have saved more throughout life, planned their retirement better or at least researched their potential companies more before starting them.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-08/older-americans-shun-retirement-at-65-for-risky-startups.html?source=imwsitlnk0000001