Yeah the article didn't ring with me either. And as mentioned in the article, those with higher incomes can do more to minimise their tax bill, especially if they're not spending the lot.
Although our government has been going on about a 'budget emergency' for years. Some of the measures they have suggested to cut expenditure have been unpopular, so maybe it's more politically palatable to focus on the revenue side, especially if it's perceived to not hurt the 'battlers'.
What has a greater economic impact, asking the poorest 20% to contribute $1 each, or the wealthiest 4% to contribute $5 each?
Although the other issue here in Australia is that of Federal - State relations. Many of the portfolios traditionally handled by state governments, the federal government is involved in. Should there be a clearer delineation between Federal and State responsibilities? Should states be given more power to levy their own taxes?
For the non-Australians here, sales tax (GST) here is a uniform rate nationwide, collected by the Federal Government and distributed to the states, and states do not impose their own income taxes.
Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk