Holy shit that adviser had it bass-ackwards. First don't retire in your 60s at all; second, if you are forced to retire, get a job to make whatever you can; and then third, and only if all else fails, get your spending under control. ??? How about do #3 first, and render 1 and 2 irrelevant?
I like Michelle Singletary a lot. And I can also see the poor lady's shock when all of her plans went up in smoke -- heck, my mom was terrified that she'd never get by after my stepdad died, even though she had a full-time teaching job, her own company that made multiples of her teaching salary, AND his full SS AND pension. This for a woman who spends probably $30K/yr, owns three paid-off properties, and could buy and sell me. It's not a rational response; it's a natural fear response when faced with a major unexpected life change that totally blows apart what you thought your future would be.
But I am livid at that advisor. Someone needs to hold that lady's hand and walk her through what her options are and how long her money will really last -- not tell her, "yep, you should be terrified, you're basically fucked, sorry, sucks to be you." I'm sure Michelle at least did that, because that's the kind of person she is, and it just didn't make it into the column. But boy that advisor's response left me with a bad taste in my mouth.