Author Topic: The Secure Act  (Read 1932 times)

WSUCoug1994

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 537
  • Location: Bay Area, California
The Secure Act
« on: December 18, 2019, 12:01:08 PM »
Some interesting changes are being sent to the Senate in The Secure Act

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/17/congress-close-to-approving-changes-to-retirement-savings-for-workers.html

Threshkin

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1088
  • Location: Colorado
    • My Journal
Re: The Secure Act
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2019, 03:50:31 PM »
Looks good to me.

Some might be unhappy with the inheritance changes though.  But I like that the changes are overall self funded.

Buffaloski Boris

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2121
Re: The Secure Act
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2019, 04:29:07 PM »
Not much of a change. RMDs at 72 versus 70.5 isn’t much of a difference. Getting rid of the stretch IRA stinks. Another reason to prefer Roth’s if you don’t plan on spending it all before you pass on. Looks like a sweetheart deal for the insurance industry.


TomTX

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5345
  • Location: Texas
Re: The Secure Act
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2019, 05:57:23 PM »
Yeah, those annuities hucksters really slipped into an enormous market.

Are some annuities good? Sure. Far too many bad ones.

Gin1984

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4931
Re: The Secure Act
« Reply #4 on: December 19, 2019, 05:57:41 PM »
I'm pissed, just more ways to get money from the middle class.

secondcor521

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5522
  • Age: 54
  • Location: Boise, Idaho
  • Big cattle, no hat.
    • Age of Eon - Overwatch player videos
Re: The Secure Act
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2019, 09:44:17 PM »
Not much of a change. RMDs at 72 versus 70.5 isn’t much of a difference. Getting rid of the stretch IRA stinks. Another reason to prefer Roth’s if you don’t plan on spending it all before you pass on. Looks like a sweetheart deal for the insurance industry.

Note that Roths inherited by non-spouse beneficiaries are also subject to RMDs and are probably subject to the 10 year emptying rule in the SECURE Act.  No taxes are due, but the account still needs to be drained in that time limit and thus those monies lose their tax-free status over that timeframe.

 

Wow, a phone plan for fifteen bucks!