Author Topic: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....  (Read 24184 times)

edgema

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 106
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #50 on: June 13, 2017, 04:54:47 AM »
Oneyear – I would love to say that we have not inflated our life but certainly have. Certainly share your concern of retiring into a bull market. Currently I think it makes sense to put into my own SIPP to get 40% tax back rather than 20% on the hers although she does have one. We have also been focused on paying down the mortgage to a low LTV on the rental properties, which may not be the most financially sensible thing, spreadsheet wise, makes me feel happy to run with very low LTVs as I am not trying to punt the property market, but earn a steady income so the lower the LTV the steadier an lower risk the income (no interest rate volatility).

Skip207 – not sure of your situation family wise. Our number is for a family of 4 with two young children. So we may or may not be comparable.   

Neverrun / undercover – I am snap with Neverrun. No turning back. Even at 40 I am one of the greyer members of the team. 5 years out and even greyer and I am out. Although I am definitely in ‘coasting’ mode as you put it.

Frugaldoc – Agree. It is not bargain basement but we are living close to Plymouth now. A pretty cheap COL for the south anyway.

Glad to see that there seem to be quite a few others who feel somewhat similarly in terms of numbers. Just for the record we have already moved from London to Plymouth/Devon to unlock equity, and have invested that equity, but my job still has me commuting weekly up to London. So sort of HCOL day-to-day now for LCOL later. I also probably gave an incorrect impression that I really care what my ex colleagues and family would think about the scenario of realizing in 5 years that the numbers are wrong and we are short of wealth to last the duration. This was badly written as that isn’t the case. I used that language to try to illustrate the fact that I would massively beat myself up if that were to happen (so more that they would be right– rather than them thinking it). Poor writing by me.

What I have realized it that too much of this debate goes on inside my head so have had some long discussions with my wife since posting. Whilst there are always uncertainties, because we have already bought properties to let out as the expected main source of income (with a SIPP to come in 15 years or so) at the start, and have been managing them for 18 months, we have a pretty decent idea of what the income is from this. This forum discussion made me realize more clearly (as someone pointed out) that this is more about costs and feeling uncertain on this. As mentioned before, as I am away in the week we incur a lot of expense that will fall away when I pull the cord, but there are lots of grey area expenses which may not. Time to get serious about budgeting. We have decided to do two things;

1)   Set up a post FIRE bank account where we put in cash and run all the post FIRE expenses separate to the others to get a better feel.

2)   Both of us to write a list of those things we would not want to give up, those that are nice to have and those that we would be happy to cut/risk cutting. There is a trade-off which we have not really acknowledged enough, which is that for the certainty of the free time and enjoyment of RE, we have to understand what uncertainties are we willing to accept. I think we were a little too much ‘have your cake and eat it’ before now. Hopefully this will help set a framework.

Oh, and to the post that mentioned sailing around the world. That is like a knife in the soft belly of my moustachianism as I would absolutely love to do that. 12 years ago we crewed/backpacked for a year on a sailboat before getting serious about work so is a major dream… Oh dear, think I have just signed on for more work.

edgema

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 106
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #51 on: June 13, 2017, 05:14:42 AM »
Oneyear -  "I'd rather work one more year now than worry about money in 10" is so true and the voice that drowns out the others at the moment.

I know there is a thread on the topic but I think current earnings and what industry you are in is a massive element here.

If you are in a high earning but fickle industry like I am, then the opportunity cost of leaving is extremely high as you probably wont get back in 5 years from now and the strep down in pay to anything else I am qualified to do (i.e. nothing) is enormous (probably a 75% cut in earnings). Side hustling doing something not fun - because you need to - would be a silly failure versus sticking around a little longer. If I am matched betting to make 700 quid a month staring at screens something has gone very wrong! 

If you are in a high earning but skilled industry (say accounting / tax / dentistry at the risk of getting this wrong) or where a consulting / part time style option exists, then the opportunity cost is way lower. I would FIRE now if I could keep an iron in the fire doing a little work here and there, or where I had reasonable confidence I could return in a few years.

If you are in a lower earning profession, skilled or not, the opportunity cost is simply much lower simply as the step down to another job/industry is going to far lower if things don't work out.

It is back to the 'golden handcuff' comment made a while back on this thread. The bigger they are the bigger the opportunity cost if you have worked hard to get them. The good news there for me is that my handcuffs fall away in large part on March 2019 so the more I write and think about this, the more this seems like a good date for me.

JustGettingStarted1980

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 377
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #52 on: June 13, 2017, 05:41:58 AM »
every person thats FIREd around here that i've seen post about it has said they didnt pull the plug early enough.  everything has been far safer and people earned income typically even after FIRE.  that said our number is pushing 2MM we just use the concepts here to cut back in areas we dont get value and to save the correct ways, also for the withdrawal startegies.  that said we have high income jobs in LCOL so we will hit our number by 37 at the latest.

Hi everyone, good discussion!

In regards to the above, this is Recency Bias. The market from 2008-2017 has been so wonderful that, of course, everyone who retired wishes they had retired sooner.  Sequence of returns risk has been eliminated for most recent retirees (<5 years).  The next 5 years, however, may have a very different sequence of returns.

FWIW,

JGS

edgema

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 106
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #53 on: June 13, 2017, 06:00:49 AM »
JustGettingStarted1980

Exactly - I work at an investment firm so (am at least supposed to) understand these things. The predominantly US domiciled mustachians take the best developed market country for economic growth (the US) over the last decade / 50 years, and incredibly strong equity markets (US from 08-17 as you say) which have taken multiples to very high levels on very high margins. You don't need to think things will collapse to see that the arithmetic is just really hard to continue to see such returns. To then forecast out 7%+ with confidence with 100% equity allocations is pretty bold. 

I mentioned earlier in the thread how the 'class of 2018' thread has lots of talk of 'just needing markets to go up another 10%' and they are done. Madness. What happens if market goes down 20% the year after? Are you then 'not done' and go straight back to work (if you can). Seems foolhardy to me once again if you are that sensitive to equity market moves, you are not FIRE, you are crossing your fingers. That or you have a stoic (heroic?) like ability to look through such volatility and believe in the long term trend. I for one do not have this confidence or ability. 

Although deeply unpopular here in the UK I am about 40% property as a landlord, then 40% in equities and 20% other stuff.


LANCELOTNYC

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #54 on: June 13, 2017, 06:40:30 AM »
What would you suggest as a city which is a lower cost alternative to London that is still sufficiently exciting, dynamic, close to airport, etc.?

edgema

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 106
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #55 on: June 13, 2017, 07:20:50 AM »
Crumbs. I am likely not the one to answer as we did not try to find a London like experience as we were kind of over London anyway. Suppose it depends on what things about London you find exciting and dynamic?

Speaking for me, many of our ‘London’ friends would perhaps despair at the lack of fancy restaurants, theatre or arts in Plymouth (we are just outside). But we find plenty to do – and this is before we are FIREd.

For us, the lifestyle is great. We love the outdoors and ocean and are 50m from the South West coast path so can run / walk / cycle overlooking the sea or in 20 minutes be up on the moors. I can swim / kayak / paddleboard in the ocean. Not currently a surfer but silver-haired surfing is on the list for next year and 30mins (or 50mins to north Devon coast) to go to. Kite surfing (learning this summer) is 30 mins away to a major site. Perhaps the anti-thesis of exciting or dynamic but we are up to our ears in National Trust to take the kids to.

There are local bands aplenty so I am looking forward to translating my hobby (playing guitar) into messing around playing some pub gigs hopefully. Music wise we are going to the Eden project to watch Bastille this Thursday and Royal Blood next Thursday. We are going to the Port Eliot festival in a couple of weeks.

If dynamism is party the people then we have had a great experience moving here. Massive hospital so loads of Doctors and plenty of self-made people who look east to London and wonder what on earth people are doing commuting 1.5hrs to 60+hr a week jobs to pay for £1m houses and 4x4s. A few long distance commuters like me (for the moment). It is a bit of a mustachian place, attitude wise. People react positively when we lay out our FIRE ideas and plans here.

There may not be many Michelin stars, but we don’t struggle to find what we think is good food and besides, as a good mustachians, we are trying to cook more anyway. Certainly plenty of gastro-pub type places. Salcombe (45m) is full of wealthy Londoners so you can go as fancy as you like if you don’t mind a drive. You can get you avocado on toast for brunch in Plymouth if you wish to as well. Plenty of excellent pubs and I am more of an ‘honest’ pint person versus £15 cocktail person anyway.

Airports are a pain to travel to (45m to Exeter / 1.45 to Bristol). Cannot get around that. We have adapted though, and our summer holiday is to go to France on the ferry from Plymouth.

Suits us. Others might hate it.

spokey doke

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 514
  • Escaped from the ivory tower basement
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #56 on: June 13, 2017, 08:37:58 AM »
I'll just chime in here with another over 2M number...and we are still at it.  Like some others, I'm beyond ready fully check out, but DW...not so much.  At least I quit my frustrating career job to run my own small business, which so far is rather gratifying (but still a bunch of work).  I currently look at the extra, extra padding as something not worth getting upset about ('what a bummer, I have all this extra money to deal with!').  I can relax much more about finances now, and presumably, later too.  But that still leaves the rather big question of when to completely pull the plug.

On that question, everyone has their own assumptions on what makes sense, and a favorite past-time here on MMM is debating which assumptions are reasonable...too conservative...too risky.  But in the end, it is ALL speculation, and no on knows how things will turn out.  Good to have a community to bounce ideas off of though, and gain some potential insights from.  Nice to watch the debate from a well padded stache-a-lounger...

LiveLean

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 888
  • Location: Central Florida
    • ToLiveLean
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #57 on: June 13, 2017, 08:50:01 AM »
A lot depends on whether you have a pension. It seems most (but not all) of the folks who frequent MMM do not have a pension. Thus, they calculate FIRE based solely on the FIRE number and how that will provide for them. If you know based on your pension that you have X coming to you for life -- plus possibly full medical coverage if you're, say, retired military -- then the formula is much different.

I know career military people who live a much larger lifestyle than their income would suggest since they know they have that pension and medical coming for life. (Good for them, they earned it.) Same is true with those who still have a government or corporate pension coming, though admittedly those typically do not have a lifetime medical component.

But if you have no pension coming, I'd say having a FIRE number over $2m not only is mustachian but advisable.

I also take my FIRE number and net worth and divide it by two. Not because I'm expecting to get divorced, but because I look at everything as jointly owned with DW - which it is - and the assets have to provide for two of us for life, which could entail significant medical, senior care, etc.

So if "my" net worth or FIRE number was $2 million, I'd really be at $1 million in my mind.

JustGettingStarted1980

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 377
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #58 on: June 13, 2017, 01:35:27 PM »
A lot depends on whether you have a pension. It seems most (but not all) of the folks who frequent MMM do not have a pension. Thus, they calculate FIRE based solely on the FIRE number and how that will provide for them. If you know based on your pension that you have X coming to you for life -- plus possibly full medical coverage if you're, say, retired military -- then the formula is much different.

I know career military people who live a much larger lifestyle than their income would suggest since they know they have that pension and medical coming for life. (Good for them, they earned it.) Same is true with those who still have a government or corporate pension coming, though admittedly those typically do not have a lifetime medical component.

But if you have no pension coming, I'd say having a FIRE number over $2m not only is mustachian but advisable.

I also take my FIRE number and net worth and divide it by two. Not because I'm expecting to get divorced, but because I look at everything as jointly owned with DW - which it is - and the assets have to provide for two of us for life, which could entail significant medical, senior care, etc.

So if "my" net worth or FIRE number was $2 million, I'd really be at $1 million in my mind.


If you want a pension, just go ahead and buy an annuity with your money to get a "absolute base" of income for all your remaining years. The "catch", of course, is that if you die too early, your money is gone! Of course, I don't know any companies that sell annuities to 35 year olds on MMM!!! If you are retiring at 50+, though, this seems reasonable.

https://www.immediateannuities.com/

Monthly payout for (1 million dollars up front) for the rest of your life beginning at age 50 (with spousal benefit) is $4000 and change.

Have fun with their calculator!

JGS


dreams_and_discoveries

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 924
  • Location: London, UK
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #59 on: June 13, 2017, 01:52:39 PM »
Yeah, I'm also considering a post FIRE non London location in 4 years, even tho I adore London.

Current thoughts are rent my house and travel, then come back to the UK and try out other locations - fancy a season in the Lake District,  the South West Coast, the Highlands, Bristol etc. Thinking I'll be semi nomadic and rent then, and settle if/when I feel like it.

markbike528CBX

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1906
  • Location: the Everbrown part of the Evergreen State (WA)
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #60 on: June 13, 2017, 02:58:34 PM »
.........my colleagues resent when I suggest going for a drink the day before payday.....

Ooooooh!    Now I have a way to out the secret mustachians

anti-mustachians...." oh no, payday isn't till tomorrow "
mustachians.  " ah, sure, why not". (searches for excuse to avoid spending )
FI... payday is tomorrow, and I've got cash
FIRE. what day of the week is it? What is this payday thing everyone talks about?  What do you mean, you work for money and not for fun?

VolcanicArts

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 129
  • Location: San Antonio
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #61 on: June 13, 2017, 03:16:21 PM »
I think over 2 million is a reasonable number. I personally am aiming over 3 million just to cover all my bases and I want to be able to splurge every now and then without cannabilizing the principal. Realistically though, I think just 1 million would be enough to live pretty well and worry free.

Tyler

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #62 on: June 13, 2017, 03:30:56 PM »
The 4% rule works for USA but not the UK, where the rule is 3% - there was a table of the rates for different countries floating around here a while back, but I've lost track of it.

This isn't the table you're referencing, but it's still directly relevant:  Your home country is inseparable from your withdrawal rate

TL;DR -- The 4% rule is not universal, and there are tools to help investors calculate appropriate withdrawal rates for their particular country and portfolio.
« Last Edit: June 13, 2017, 03:34:42 PM by Tyler »

daverobev

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3963
  • Location: France
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #63 on: June 13, 2017, 05:15:35 PM »
I think over 2 million is a reasonable number. I personally am aiming over 3 million just to cover all my bases and I want to be able to splurge every now and then without cannabilizing the principal. Realistically though, I think just 1 million would be enough to live pretty well and worry free.

Remember in the UK you don't need to worry about medical.. including dental and vision. Big difference.

$2m is what, 1.5 million GBP. I'd say "you could live like a king on that" but the truth is you could live like a king on 1k GBP a month with a paid-for home. By king I mean any king more than 60 years ago, say.

$1m USD = $40k USD a year. 2000 pounds a month. I lived on less than that, with a mortgage, and commuting costs, and payments into a pension (stupid stupid me didn't put money into an ISA).

Also the UK is massively wealth-friendly. Massive ISA allowance. Capital gains allowance. Income allowance. IMHO the UK is a really really good place to FIRE.

Playing with Fire UK

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3449
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #64 on: June 15, 2017, 12:16:13 AM »
.........my colleagues resent when I suggest going for a drink the day before payday.....

Ooooooh!    Now I have a way to out the secret mustachians

anti-mustachians...." oh no, payday isn't till tomorrow "
mustachians.  " ah, sure, why not". (searches for excuse to avoid spending )
FI... payday is tomorrow, and I've got cash
FIRE. what day of the week is it? What is this payday thing everyone talks about?  What do you mean, you work for money and not for fun?

Yes! This is how I found my one mustachian work buddy: we were the only people in the team up for a drink, and it took us a while to realise that it was because it was the day before payday. Granted drinking in London is not the cheapest of activities, but if you can't afford £5 the day before payday, you probably shouldn't be spending £20 on payday.

dreams_and_discoveries

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 924
  • Location: London, UK
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #65 on: June 15, 2017, 01:08:55 AM »
.........my colleagues resent when I suggest going for a drink the day before payday.....

Ooooooh!    Now I have a way to out the secret mustachians

anti-mustachians...." oh no, payday isn't till tomorrow "
mustachians.  " ah, sure, why not". (searches for excuse to avoid spending )
FI... payday is tomorrow, and I've got cash
FIRE. what day of the week is it? What is this payday thing everyone talks about?  What do you mean, you work for money and not for fun?

Yes! This is how I found my one mustachian work buddy: we were the only people in the team up for a drink, and it took us a while to realise that it was because it was the day before payday. Granted drinking in London is not the cheapest of activities, but if you can't afford £5 the day before payday, you probably shouldn't be spending £20 on payday.

A good approach, it always puzzles me how many high earners are eagerly awaiting pay day each month...

Little Aussie Battler

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 230
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #66 on: June 15, 2017, 05:06:05 AM »
The 4% rule works for USA but not the UK, where the rule is 3% - there was a table of the rates for different countries floating around here a while back, but I've lost track of it.

This isn't the table you're referencing, but it's still directly relevant:  Your home country is inseparable from your withdrawal rate

TL;DR -- The 4% rule is not universal, and there are tools to help investors calculate appropriate withdrawal rates for their particular country and portfolio.
Wow - I'm amazed that the Australian SWR is so low.

Might have to do some more research on this.

daverobev

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3963
  • Location: France
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #67 on: June 15, 2017, 05:40:35 AM »
The 4% rule works for USA but not the UK, where the rule is 3% - there was a table of the rates for different countries floating around here a while back, but I've lost track of it.

This isn't the table you're referencing, but it's still directly relevant:  Your home country is inseparable from your withdrawal rate

TL;DR -- The 4% rule is not universal, and there are tools to help investors calculate appropriate withdrawal rates for their particular country and portfolio.

That isn't what it says; it says if you invest 80% in your home country's stocks and 20% bonds.

Why would anyone these days invest only in domestic stuff? Even Americans, who have the largest number and weighting of true multinationals. You'd be nuts, as an Australian or Canadian, to invest only in domestic stuff!

The UK is *somewhat* like the US, in that the FTSE 100 is quite multinational, but even so, there's just no reason. Go by market cap, which would lead you to ~40% US, 40% everything else, 20% bonds, and you'll be fine.

Linea_Norway

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8576
  • Location: Norway
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #68 on: June 15, 2017, 06:56:42 AM »
My DH fingered that since we have already paid of our house and mountain cabin in Norwegian crowns and have Norwegian incomes and pensions, we should invest the rest of our money into something foreign.
That is why we only have index funds investing in international stuff, bought in the foreign currency. Just to spread the risk.

Tyler

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #69 on: June 15, 2017, 09:47:06 AM »
That isn't what it says; it says if you invest 80% in your home country's stocks and 20% bonds.

Why would anyone these days invest only in domestic stuff? Even Americans, who have the largest number and weighting of true multinationals. You'd be nuts, as an Australian or Canadian, to invest only in domestic stuff!

The UK is *somewhat* like the US, in that the FTSE 100 is quite multinational, but even so, there's just no reason. Go by market cap, which would lead you to ~40% US, 40% everything else, 20% bonds, and you'll be fine.

Remember, the Trinity study never looked at international investments at all.  So you're already breaking from the assumptions that established the 4% rule and should not assume the same results apply to you.

The article covers how this affects withdrawal rates.  Because local inflation and exchange rates alter the purchasing power of your returns, even investing exclusively in the US S&P500 and intermediate US bonds just like the Trinity study would still not guarantee that the 4% rule worked outside of the US!  I would not recommend putting so much faith in a calculation based on the inflation-adjusted returns in a country you don't live in for a portfolio you don't even own that also ignores the effect of exchange rates for international investments. 

The 4% rule is a good rule of thumb for US investors.  But it's not absolute for every portfolio, and it's definitely not universal in every country. 
« Last Edit: June 15, 2017, 10:35:21 AM by Tyler »

daverobev

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3963
  • Location: France
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #70 on: June 15, 2017, 11:58:31 AM »
That isn't what it says; it says if you invest 80% in your home country's stocks and 20% bonds.

Why would anyone these days invest only in domestic stuff? Even Americans, who have the largest number and weighting of true multinationals. You'd be nuts, as an Australian or Canadian, to invest only in domestic stuff!

The UK is *somewhat* like the US, in that the FTSE 100 is quite multinational, but even so, there's just no reason. Go by market cap, which would lead you to ~40% US, 40% everything else, 20% bonds, and you'll be fine.

Remember, the Trinity study never looked at international investments at all.  So you're already breaking from the assumptions that established the 4% rule and should not assume the same results apply to you.

The article covers how this affects withdrawal rates.  Because local inflation and exchange rates alter the purchasing power of your returns, even investing exclusively in the US S&P500 and intermediate US bonds just like the Trinity study would still not guarantee that the 4% rule worked outside of the US!  I would not recommend putting so much faith in a calculation based on the inflation-adjusted returns in a country you don't live in for a portfolio you don't even own that also ignores the effect of exchange rates for international investments. 

The 4% rule is a good rule of thumb for US investors.  But it's not absolute for every portfolio, and it's definitely not universal in every country.

You're making the assumption, then, that the 4% rule will continue to work for Americans because America will continue to outperform?

Of course someone living outside the US shouldn't have US bonds; it makes no sense at all.

There are lots of reasons to assume the 4% rule will, just about, work, or be close to it - it's cheap to diversify, and rebalancing within those diverse sets will smooth everything out. Fluctuating exchange rates are also a benefit, over time.

It's banal to compare something like the S&P 500 which is massively multinational, to Australia.

Everyone here should, to some extent, have a similar looking portfolio, regardless of where they live. Home country bonds for the most part, but a similar mix of holdings via ETFs - US, EAFE, etc, etc. And yes, they should expect 4% to work. Or at least be as likely to work as in the Trinity study, because diversification is *better*.

*Edit* I will admit to making assumptions above, and if someone has good data/reports showing how an international diversified portfolio performs over time, that'd be awesome.
« Last Edit: June 15, 2017, 12:02:19 PM by daverobev »

Tyler

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #71 on: June 15, 2017, 12:37:55 PM »
Everyone here should, to some extent, have a similar looking portfolio, regardless of where they live. Home country bonds for the most part, but a similar mix of holdings via ETFs - US, EAFE, etc, etc. And yes, they should expect 4% to work. Or at least be as likely to work as in the Trinity study, because diversification is *better*.

The Trinity study did not account for foreign bonds, EAFE funds, exchange rates, or the inflation in countries outside of the US.  So to assume the 4% rule still applies even when you change all the inputs is quite the jump.  Note that you can play with the withdrawal rates calculator at the linked site to study your proposed portfolio in different countries.

BTW, to not sidetrack the conversation too much I started a new thread on this topic:  https://forum.mrmoneymustache.com/investor-alley/why-retirees-outside-of-the-us-should-not-blindly-follow-the-4-rule/
« Last Edit: June 15, 2017, 12:43:27 PM by Tyler »

oneyear

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 99
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #72 on: June 16, 2017, 11:00:16 AM »
A good approach, it always puzzles me how many high earners are eagerly awaiting pay day each month...

You don't eagerly await the next opportunity to invest in VSL100?

Playing with Fire UK

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3449
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #73 on: June 16, 2017, 01:46:42 PM »
A good approach, it always puzzles me how many high earners are eagerly awaiting pay day each month...
You don't eagerly await the next opportunity to invest in VSL100?

In my office they await it desperately rather than eagerly; we are not poorly paid.

dreams_and_discoveries

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 924
  • Location: London, UK
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #74 on: June 16, 2017, 02:14:54 PM »
A good approach, it always puzzles me how many high earners are eagerly awaiting pay day each month...
You don't eagerly await the next opportunity to invest in VSL100?

In my office they await it desperately rather than eagerly; we are not poorly paid.

Yeah, last year saw the really negative side of money issues and what it can drive people to.......someone at work (again well paid) was always a bit keen on payday, and worried when paid a day late  etc... in this case unbeknownst to us he was in a massive amount of debt, but still living it up, kid in private school etc and it all got too much for him and he snapped  and did a very bad thing.

markbike528CBX

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1906
  • Location: the Everbrown part of the Evergreen State (WA)
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #75 on: June 16, 2017, 03:52:30 PM »
Quote from: dreams_and_discoveries link=topic=74364.msg1591781#msg1591781
and .......did a very bad thing.

When I read this with my bad British accent in my head I'm left wondering if this was

   a) putting the wrong fork on the wrong side of the plate  (hoping)
   b) mayhem of some sort (my guess from the wording otherwise).

Too much watching "Masterpiece Theater" (typically a British production) on Public Broadcasting here in the US.

AdrianC

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Location: Cincinnati
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #76 on: June 17, 2017, 11:21:59 PM »
$100k expenses per year and no house payment?  What the hell are you people spending your money on?

Here's my back of envelope FIRE budget for our family of five:

Medical 15
Groceries 12
Bills 6
Property tax 7
College savings 10
Kids Activities 5
Vacation 5
Cars 5
Clothes 2
Misc 3
Charity 10

Total 80
Tax 10
Total 90
Contingency 10
Total 100k

College savings go down as medical goes up, maybe.



dreams_and_discoveries

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 924
  • Location: London, UK
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #77 on: June 18, 2017, 01:37:46 AM »
Quote from: dreams_and_discoveries link=topic=74364.msg1591781#msg1591781
and .......did a very bad thing.

When I read this with my bad British accent in my head I'm left wondering if this was

   a) putting the wrong fork on the wrong side of the plate  (hoping)
   b) mayhem of some sort (my guess from the wording otherwise).

Too much watching "Masterpiece Theater" (typically a British production) on Public Broadcasting here in the US.

Ha ha, love the assumptions of British humour, sadly it was a more serious offence which ended in jail time.

Bateaux

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2324
  • Location: Port Vincent
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #78 on: June 18, 2017, 04:14:57 AM »
Leaving our good paying jobs with less than 2M won't fund my dreams now.  Yes, we may be overshooting the years we need to work, but the money making machine is in high gear right now.  I want a yacht as a home.  A big 440 Lagoon Catamaran.   Probably 350k to purchase used and get fit for cruising.   It's the current dream.  We could buy a 50k monohull and go now, but I want a degree of comfort.  I don't think my wife would go along unless it's a big Catamaran.   Missing my life dream to me is more important than missing two more years by working.  Not exactly Mustacian, but we've lived frugally to make this dream possible. 

PizzaSteve

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 501
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #79 on: June 18, 2017, 09:03:01 AM »
Leaving our good paying jobs with less than 2M won't fund my dreams now.  Yes, we may be overshooting the years we need to work, but the money making machine is in high gear right now.  I want a yacht as a home.  A big 440 Lagoon Catamaran.   Probably 350k to purchase used and get fit for cruising.   It's the current dream.  We could buy a 50k monohull and go now, but I want a degree of comfort.  I don't think my wife would go along unless it's a big Catamaran.   Missing my life dream to me is more important than missing two more years by working.  Not exactly Mustacian, but we've lived frugally to make this dream possible.
Good for you.  I hope your dream comes through soon.  Dont forget to allow for gas, maintenance and insurance.

MMMdude

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 322
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #80 on: June 18, 2017, 12:00:11 PM »
When i first got into early retirement I figured I would only need 625k to make it work.  25k/year spend 25X multiple.  I then realized that at such an early age 25X wasn't really realistic and wanted 33X.  There are endless threads on that debate, let's not revisit it

Then I realized my 25K was super bare and didn't cover one off expenses like auto replacement, major house repairs (what if your foundation goes?), major medical/dental (even with living in Canada) and possibly caring for aging parents.  Also I want to spend more on travel and hobbies then I originally envisioned.  So my 25K is now 50K.  I am aiming for north of $1.5Mil now, probably $2Mil.  Thankfully that should only mean 6-8 more years for me.

AdrianC

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Location: Cincinnati
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #81 on: June 18, 2017, 12:18:52 PM »
Looks like we're suffering from OMM* syndrome.



*One More Million.

ixtap

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4583
  • Age: 51
  • Location: SoCal
    • Our Sea Story
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #82 on: June 18, 2017, 12:28:09 PM »
Leaving our good paying jobs with less than 2M won't fund my dreams now.  Yes, we may be overshooting the years we need to work, but the money making machine is in high gear right now.  I want a yacht as a home.  A big 440 Lagoon Catamaran.   Probably 350k to purchase used and get fit for cruising.   It's the current dream.  We could buy a 50k monohull and go now, but I want a degree of comfort.  I don't think my wife would go along unless it's a big Catamaran.   Missing my life dream to me is more important than missing two more years by working.  Not exactly Mustacian, but we've lived frugally to make this dream possible.

You must be getting an awful good deal; I would expect to pay that much just for the Lagoon, much less the outfitting.

We will see you out there, albeit in our monohull. Our numbers include ~30x expenses + replacement. The replacement is in case we need a new boat or to help transition back to land, as the case may be.


Bateaux

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2324
  • Location: Port Vincent
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #83 on: June 19, 2017, 09:39:54 PM »
Leaving our good paying jobs with less than 2M won't fund my dreams now.  Yes, we may be overshooting the years we need to work, but the money making machine is in high gear right now.  I want a yacht as a home.  A big 440 Lagoon Catamaran.   Probably 350k to purchase used and get fit for cruising.   It's the current dream.  We could buy a 50k monohull and go now, but I want a degree of comfort.  I don't think my wife would go along unless it's a big Catamaran.   Missing my life dream to me is more important than missing two more years by working.  Not exactly Mustacian, but we've lived frugally to make this dream possible.

You must be getting an awful good deal; I would expect to pay that much just for the Lagoon, much less the outfitting.

We will see you out there, albeit in our monohull. Our numbers include ~30x expenses + replacement. The replacement is in case we need a new boat or to help transition back to land, as the case may be.

I think I  can find a boat for 250k to 300K and spend 50k to 100k on refit.  We'll have the 2M invested and whatever our real estate is worth for the purchase.  I wouldn't want less than 1.75M funding ourmlives and the boat.

Unique User

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 718
  • Location: NC
Re: My FIRE number is over $2.0m - am I just not a moustachian....
« Reply #84 on: June 23, 2017, 08:09:38 AM »
We semi-retired at 58 and 53. We both work some doing consulting, etc (about 10 hours/week) for me. His tends to be full-time and then long periods with no work. WE have found in the past 5 years that we are spending less in some categories but lots more in others like health insurance, traveling, going out to eat, etc. This is because we are not tired all the time from working. WE want to enjoy while we can because we have seen people die in their 50's-60's.  I think it is better to work a little longer then necessary then to quit to soon and be sorry.

Cassie - This is my goal almost to the exact on ages.  Can you share what type of work you did FT and what you do now?   I work in consulting now, but not as a consultant and think I could easily pick up project work.  Of course I may be delusional.