Author Topic: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house  (Read 20550 times)

Dicey

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 22429
  • Age: 66
  • Location: NorCal
Re: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house
« Reply #50 on: June 01, 2017, 11:40:00 AM »
Honeybbq, you inspired me to check mine. Zillow says $4700/month. Ho-lee shit, Batman! Not that I trust Zillow, hee hee.

Slee_stack

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 876
Re: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house
« Reply #51 on: June 02, 2017, 10:33:47 AM »
Big houses (or more to the point Big VALUE houses) frustrate the heck out of me due to tax bills, and other ancillary expenses that tend to track house value.  The recurring costs are what can truly derail FIRE if one isn't careful.

Folks who bank on 'big gains' from their house appreciation also tend to get squeezed for equally BIG tax payments by the government year over year.  We did a recent cost assessment of what our house has sucked up over the past 10 years.  Ouch!  I can tell you where ALL our 'appreciation' (and far more) actually went!  At least we had an OK place to live, but our house is NOT making us rich.  At best, we are ahead of renting...but not crazy ahead.  That's actually good enough for me and about what I expect out of a personal residence.

Our property tax just went up 70% this year because our house is supposedly worth 70% more than last year.  That sucks big time and its making us think about running for the hills.

Most would think they were richer because... 70% gain!!.   That's great if we could list and sell this minute and find a sucker...err buyer. 

Unfortunately, today our NW growth just tanked as now we have 70% extra in tax to pay per month for...absolutely nothing in return.

House VALUE can definitely be a FIRE killer.

Ours is 1600 s.f.  We could have saved some decent taxes had we bought a 1200ish one.

Dicey

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 22429
  • Age: 66
  • Location: NorCal
Re: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house
« Reply #52 on: June 02, 2017, 11:58:30 AM »
1. Big houses (or more to the point Big VALUE houses) frustrate the heck out of me due to tax bills, and other ancillary expenses that tend to track house value.  The recurring costs are what can truly derail FIRE if one isn't careful.

2. Folks who bank on 'big gains' from their house appreciation also tend to get squeezed for equally BIG tax payments by the government year over year.  We did a recent cost assessment of what our house has sucked up over the past 10 years.  Ouch!  I can tell you where ALL our 'appreciation' (and far more) actually went!  At least we had an OK place to live, but our house is NOT making us rich.  At best, we are ahead of renting...but not crazy ahead.  That's actually good enough for me and about what I expect out of a personal residence.

3. Our property tax just went up 70% this year because our house is supposedly worth 70% more than last year.  That sucks big time and its making us think about running for the hills.

4. Most would think they were richer because... 70% gain!!.   That's great if we could list and sell this minute and find a sucker...err buyer. 

5. Unfortunately, today our NW growth just tanked as now we have 70% extra in tax to pay per month for...absolutely nothing in return.

6. House VALUE can definitely be a FIRE killer.

7. Ours is 1600 s.f.  We could have saved some decent taxes had we bought a 1200ish one.
1. Yes! Our fucking expensive clown house costs nearly 12k per year in property taxes.

2. I respectfully disagree. In the nearly four years we've owned it, our ten-year-old, custom built (not by us, we bought it on a short sale) 2600 sf palace has needed a major furnace repair, built-in microwave replacement ($1500 microwave? WTF? DH found one for "only" $600, argh!), extensive repairs to shithead 36" $5k stove's oven, plumbing work, landscaping, blah x 3. Fortunately,  DH is a very smart and handy guy. None of this will break us, but it could get really spendy if we called someone for repairs every time something craps out. Shockingly, our Homeowner's Insurance has dropped like a rock since we've owned it, go figure. It now costs less than our car insurance and our cars are probably worth <5% of the cost of the house. Oh, and our utilities dropped by an order of magnitude once we registered DH's C-PAP.

2a. Our house may be expensive, but we can math. It's gained almost $100k in value for every year we've owned it, which is more than DH grosses, let alone brings home. That covers a lot of taxes and repairs. When our next door neighbor finishes replacing his old 850 sf dump with his DIY 3000 sf forever home, and they finish the 5 custom houses down the street, the new comps are going to give us at least another $100k boost. Sorry, this just wouldn't happen in a rental.

3. God, I love California and Prop. 13! This can't happen here. It's based on the purchase price, which is a completely different kind of pain, but you know what it will be (and stay) going in. The new comps mentioned above won't change our taxes at all, only our tax-sheltered resale value. It's a boon for us, to be sure, but you don't get that if you're renting the property, all you get is rent increases with nothing to show for it. We can change or replace anything we want. Plus, it can't be sold out from under us.

4. Do you want to sell yet? How you know you wouldn't get a buyer at that price?

5. Pfft, only on paper. If you don't believe the new tax assessment is correct, make your case and challenge it. You don't have to accept this without a fight. Make it a case study on the RE thread and you'll get plenty of guidance. Go for it!

6. Excellent reason not to include home equity in your NW calculations.

7. Sweet! That's about what we'll look for or build when DSS, MIL + her pal Al Z. Heimer, 2 rescue dogs and 1 rescue cat are no longer living under our roof. We're even going to downsize our bed. What mustachian needs to sleep in a damn king size bed?

better late

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 488
Re: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house
« Reply #53 on: June 03, 2017, 09:19:10 AM »
Um. Yes. We would have been fired long ago if we had just purchased a smaller mansion house.  I'm not giving many $ details because facepunches and I'm not ready to face the reality of how much $ we wasted - but we did sell it this year so there's that.  $19,000 in taxes each year.  And the thing that really gets me is we had options. There are less expensive neighborhoods near us -- we could have easily chosen a cheaper town. 

Larsg

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Re: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house
« Reply #54 on: June 14, 2017, 02:39:35 AM »
We have $270k equity in our $390k house. I do think about all the scenarios we could have potentially chosen that would allow us to FIRE earlier like buying a multi family and living in one unit. However, we are not willing to just settle when it comes to where we live. And we decided that after years of nightmare rental situations (neighbor who fired guns right next door within city limits when he got drunk, complaints about our barking dogs which required us to take them to expensive doggy daycare daily so we wouldn't be evicted, 3' floods in our basement, landlords who charged us excessively and and unnecessarily  for "damages" like replacing entire wood floors, maintenance people intruding on us constantly for all kinds of inspections, etc.) We decided that we just don't want to live around anyone ever again! One bad neighbor can actually ruin your life--I hear it all the time. We are very happy living on our secluded 5 acres. It is worth working 10 more years if we have to just so we don't have to live on top of people!

I can totally relate to this. The house of our dreams with Puget Sound view was totally ruined when the market crashed in 08. The housing prices in the area dropped by almost 1/2 and did bring in lower caliber people. With that came a neighbor that brought with him a new wife 1/2 his age. Between them they had five teen aged kids where the septic in the houses was only built for 3 per house. The kids had boyfriends and girlfriends, did drugs, dropped out of high school, then the teen pregnancies began. Parking in our drive way when they ran out of space because of the gangle of drop outs hanging out at their house all day. Mail began to disappear, credit card charges showed up that should not be there, ID theft, on and on and on. It rendered the house worthless. We sold it at a loss, did not care, never looked back but not ever ever ever again. We also sit in the middle of 5 acres. Not a person in site. Love and has been absolutely worth working for that. When we go to sleep, no headlights showing in the windows, car doors slamming, arguments out on the street. All quite here in the forest other than the wild life that is supposed to live here.

Vegasgirl

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 150
  • Location: Washington DC Metro
  • Never have a battle of wits with an unarmed person
Re: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house
« Reply #55 on: June 14, 2017, 07:59:58 AM »
I love the vampire analogy - Sometimes I feel the same way about our house.  It's sucking the money right out from us.  Got lucky and bought our house right before housing boom/bust.  Looked all over, even close to work but DH wanted SPACE.  And so it was - we got space - just over 4500SF to be exact.  Home repairs and maintenance are way more than I want to spend but I want it to keep its value.  I'm just ready for it to be paid off !!   

Vegasgirl

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 150
  • Location: Washington DC Metro
  • Never have a battle of wits with an unarmed person
Re: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house
« Reply #56 on: June 14, 2017, 08:08:11 AM »
Wow my "Zestimate" is $666,982 with rental estimate of $3609/mo - my mortgage is $2160 so I could move closer to work, rent an apt and pay for both mortgage and rent with rental proceeds that's funny.

BFGirl

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 766
Re: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house
« Reply #57 on: June 14, 2017, 10:26:56 AM »
For my area, I've found the Zillow estimate is probably 10% higher than what I could realistically get for my house. 

ixtap

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4584
  • Age: 51
  • Location: SoCal
    • Our Sea Story
Re: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house
« Reply #58 on: June 14, 2017, 11:08:21 AM »
My partner is the high earner, but when we met there was definitely a large suburban house, 2.5 kids, retire in 60s pipeline. It just hadn't been questioned.

As a couple, we adopted my average wage, and somewhat bohemian lifestyle, in my much smaller place. In order to avoid lifestyle creep, we set fantasy goals. Turns out, our fantasies were bigger than our actual desires, so the first goal  was dropped, then the second one accelerated from five years to five months by finding an alternative more in line with our personalities, rather than a generic fantasy. FIRE is our biggest reach, obviously, but it is possible because of that early decision to live smaller.

TomTX

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5345
  • Location: Texas
Re: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house
« Reply #59 on: June 14, 2017, 03:27:48 PM »
I always lived in HCOL areas while working. There's a reason I live in LCOL post-FIRE - housing-related costs are just that much cheaper.

Husband always kinda wanted to go to Longmont CO to retire because of the things MMM says about the community. But when it came close to time to FIRE for us, we did research and real estate was simply more than we wanted to pay for there.

I wonder if the Longmont mustachians with large lots would consider ADUs for others wanting to move into the area.

Lmoot

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 844
    • Journal
Re: How many would be FIRED if they just had a smaller house
« Reply #60 on: June 15, 2017, 08:20:16 AM »
I don't earn enough to have a large housing budget, but I did buy my house at my lowest income level, at 25, just a couple years after college, at near bottom of the recession, short sale, fixer upper, claimed $8000 first time home buyer tax credit, lower rates. I had a "unicorn" experience buying my first house, and I don't think I could ever replicate or do it better again. My house is now almost double in value, what I paid 8 years ago, and the total PITI payment is less than half....almost 1/3 the Zillow rental estimate. Buying that house will probably be the best financial move I will ever do.