Your comment makes no sense at all. You think millionaires are the ones working at private clubs? You think the linemen at the airport are billionaires?
Absolutely not, I never said that. I was indicating that it contributes to and sustains the system of wealth inequality, not that every single job created is going to create a wealthy person. That would be nonsense. I was never saying that spending on a jet doesn't create jobs. I was simply clarifying that the private jet example was fundamentally different from the point I was trying to make, which was that outsourcing can be done in a way that doesn't promote wealth inequality.
As for private clubs, the one I frequent definitely doesn't staff anyone who could even remotely appear marginalized, and even if they are, they absolutely have the capacity to "pass" as fitting in within the sphere of the wealthy: well manicured, they speak the "right" way, excellent posture, appear healthy, no visibly missing or rotten teeth, and if they are marginalized, there's no way for me to find out as they're trained not to talk to me too much.
Note there that I just admitted that I frequent a private club and I absolutely benefit from the fact that it helps keep the wealth among the wealthy. The whole reason I'm there is to stick my nose into business that people outside the club don't have access to.
I happen to be rather uncomfortable with a lot of the moralizing around spending. I have my personal values and ethics, but that should not be mistaken for some universal stance on the morality of the spending, especially of others. I'm fairly certain I already said that...
I find it fascinating that people tend to be particularly sanctimonious about outsourcing domestic labour, but no one seems to flinch at buying peeled shrimp. Whatever. People are weird and no one has made a Netflix documentary yet about peeled shrimp, so there's that.