I could not agree more. I got a card shut down and ever since I don't remove the AUs when they tell me but rather when I have to because I reached the max AUs for the card and need to make room for a new customer.
Weirdly, I got a message some time ago to remove a specific AU because the guy complained that the card still showed in their report months after he bought the tradeline...
I’ve sold my first few tradelines with good company. I have been removing the AU on the date it says to on my login portal with them… So you’re saying it’s better to leave those AU on for longer to decrease risk? I did have us bank take them all off at the same time no issues but that was my first sale…
Not the person you asked, but...
It's a plausible theory. CC companies are presumably OK with "normal" AU use, but dislike piggybacking - to varying degrees in my experience and observations.
I've long thought that the way CC companies try to cut down on piggybacking is to periodically run raids on their customers and do queries to identify piggybackers. They have too many customers to look individually, so what would they put in a query to distinguish normal use from piggybacking behavior?
Total number of AUs lifetime would be one. AUs with lots of different addresses or different last names might be another. Quick adds and removes might also be used, which this strategy would avoid. But removes followed immediately by adds might also be construed as risky behavior, which this strategy would exhibit.
Even if my theory is right - that CC companies periodically run queries - it is likely that nobody here knows how they distinguish. And obviously different CC companies might distinguish in different ways, at different times, and use their query results differently: blanket closures, review individually then close, close just the offending account or all, etc.
A person very worried about AU risk (not me, but could be some people) might also point out that the longer an AU is on the card, the longer there is for the AU to either commit fraud on the card (again, very unlikely). Or just create issues in general like calling the CC company and asking them why the card is on their credit report.
Personally I remove the AU on the day the portal allows. Occasionally a day or two later - I have two due to be removed today and one tomorrow, so I'm just going to do all three tomorrow. Another (possible) benefit of my strategy: A few weeks ago I had a same day request to add an AU on a very old, very large TL. I was able to do the last minute add because I was home and saw the email and had the AU slot empty and ready to go.
Honestly, now that I write that all out, probably either way is fine. Since the Good Company just requires you to wait until at least the portal date, they probably haven't observed any serious problems with leaving AUs on longer.