I wouldn't assume you'd need to be worried about ending up in federal prison, for example, but I'm talking about the increased potential for the tradeline not posting or your card being closed.
Both of those risks you mentioned are insignificant compared to unknowingly getting involved in some kind of fraudulent scheme.
In my experience, the risk of non-posting with cards that don't require SSN to add AUs is about the same, if not less, than with those that do. This is based on selling TLs with TL companies. I don't see why it would be any different with direct sales. I mean relatively speaking. The absolute risk may be somewhat higher regardless of which cards you use.
About account closure, I think it's common knowledge that if you sell TLs, you should be prepared for the accounts you use to be closed at some point, in some cases even for all accounts to be closed with the same bank. Good Company mentions that in their documents as well.
You wrote that you can think of "another 5 or 10 risks" related to selling TLs directly but never mentioned any of those risks. You also mentioned that using cards that don't require SSN for direct sales would "really open up that door". Can you provide more details and your reasoning to support these statements?
I don't know what type of game you're trying to play here, but I'm not interested.
You specifically said:
"The risk of dealing with shady customers w/o real SSN can be mitigated by requiring SSN cards and/or using credit cards that don't require SSNs to add TLs."Why would you be getting involved in some type of fraudulent scheme if you're not adding their social security number as you previously suggested? Well, because YOU DON"T KNOW that you're getting involved in a fraudulent scheme, possibly due to failing to discover it, or, as you mentioned, simply not worrying about it - because you wrote generally exactly that when you said:
"if you don't even enter a SSN you're not responsible even if the SSN turns out to be fake and the shady customer gets caught."And now at this point in time I don't really know what you're doing apart from trying to grill me with questions. You literally just went full circle and contradicted all your previous statements by saying:
"Both of those risks you mentioned are insignificant compared to unknowingly getting involved in some kind of fraudulent scheme."Wait...... I thought you said you wouldn't be responsible??????
Dude, I am not an attorney, a financial advisor, or a tradeline company. I don't have the advice you require and I'm not confident that you even require any advice. It genuinely feels like you're trying to play dumb and then come out ahead by claiming I owe you answers.
Sounds like you're trying to pick a fight. I'm not interested in that and I don't owe you any response. I was trying to help and you're wasting my time. Maybe unintentionally. If so, no big deal.
Hopefully someone else will chime in who can provide you with the answers you seek.
@secondcor521 seems very knowledgeable and this thread was made by
@arebelspy who deals directly with the companies recommended here. If they are unable, I'm sure someone else will help you.