Hey,
I finally got my first sale on the old company. It was a Chase Explorer and when I added it I saw a warning that there is a $75 fee to add an AU to the Chase Sapphire Reserve. I had never heard of this before so I thought you all should know (of course I haven't read the whole thread yet, still working on it, so this could have been mentioned).
Also, a quick question, I am still a newbie and I am opening cards to use in the future, when trying to decide which cards to open it seems that the most relevant factor is how many AU can be added and it seems that the best option in this regard is the Barclays cards, where you can add 5 AU per cycle, is this correct? Seems like Barclays is the most lenient of issuers.
Your input will be appreciated.
Finally, a thought popped in my head last night: if a card gives you 5 AU*6 sales per year*$200 = $6,000 yearly. At the 4% FIRE estimation the card is worth $150,000. I am starting to have a lot of respect for my little plastics (and metals). And once you have 7 cards you are a "tradelines millionaire"?
Thanks
Yes, Chase charges for AUs on some of their premium CCs - CSR and probably also CSP, maybe others. It sounds like in your case that this message was just a generic message and didn't apply because your card was not one of the ones that charge the AU fee. Usually you can downgrade the CC from the premium one to a no-annual-fee card. You'll keep the same credit line and age and can still add AUs, but there won't be the $75 charge. But you'll also lose whatever premium benefits you got with the premium card (for example, you might lose the premium for spending UR points). You'll have to make the tradeoffs for yourself.
I look at a lot of factors when deciding which cards to open - number of slots would be one of those factors. Right now the main factor for me is issuer. I have a lot of credit lines with all the major issuers; if I apply for new cards with them they're likely to move CL from my existing lines to the new cards. Which is fine, except they might move CL from an existing card that I'm already using for piggybacking, which would be problematic, especially if I have an active AU on there - they would not get what was contracted for. So my next round of cards will be with issuers who (a) are accepted by the TL company I use, and (b) with whom I currently do not have any cards. YMMV.
Barclays is lenient. I think as
@Nutty said, it's also nice to know which issuers are easy to add and remove. I like CapOne, because online add and remove is very easy. The other factor, if you're doing the math on that, is how long an AU needs to be on the card. With the TL company I use, some issuers are 2 months, some are 3 months, and others are 4 months.
As
@Nutty also said, there are a lot of buyers for TLs, but there are also a lot of sellers as well, so you shouldn't expect to sell every slot every month. I don't even know what the average number of slots sold vs. available is, but I'd guess it's way under 50% and probably even under 25%. It's also not very clear to me how the TL companies allocate sales. I think it varies a lot from person to person.
But yeah, your notion of being a TL millionaire is probably essentially accurate after you (a) account for the load factor mentioned in the previous paragraph, (b) account for the risk of getting individual cards shut down - which does happen to people on a regular basis, and (c) account for the risk the piggybacking game could get shut down entirely or just winnowed down by CC restrictions. There are at least several people here who have solid four figure side gigs just on TLs.