What are your thoughts about it distorting the risk for lenders? We provide loans to individuals based on their credit score which has been boosted through this. The scores are artificially high and receive a loan, whereas they never should have received one based on their scoring. It messes with peer to peer lending as well, the individuals behind those loans are still the bad payers that they always were, despite the boosted score.
TL;DR It's cheaper for the individuals to boost their credit score and default on the next loan, compared to the goods they receive on which they default.
Has anyone been affected by boosted scores on the lender side?
That would be very shortsighted of them to pay a bunch of money to boost their score, take on new debt, then default on that debt, resulting in an even lower score than ever (since the AU boost would be removed, and they'd have newly defaulted debt).
One of the best uses of boosting your credit score is to turn it around--boost it so you can get new credit, which you pay responsibly, and improve your credit. It sucks being in a hole credit score-wise and not being able to get out of it because you can't get anyone to issue you new credit to pay on time and show you're credit worthy.
Another really good use is to boost it temporarily to get a better rate on a big loan, such as a car or house purchase. In that case, that's not something one would purposefully willingly default on, typically.
Now you can argue that people with bad credit might make shortsighted, irresponsible moves, and that may be true, but I'd also posit that many who are looking to improve their credit are trying to be more responsible, and someone going to the effort to boost their score might, in fact, be a lower risk than their score indicates due to this. I don't know one way or the other, but it doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility to me.
Finally, if someone wants to scam money, there's much easier and cheaper ways. It seems hard to imagine someone paying 1k to get a 3-5k limit CC, run up that bill, default on it, and trash their credit more. I'm sure it happens, but I wouldn't think, and would hope, that most AU boosts don't go that way.
A rep from a tradeline company (not the 2 discussed on this thread) told me that for those who hit their lifetime AU limit on Barclays cards, sometimes asking for a new card number will reset the limit. He said they've seen a 50/50 success rate with that.
I've read through this whole thread, and I don't think I've actually read a confirmed instance of someone successfully resetting their Barclays AU limit. Seems like a legend. Has anyone actually successfully reset their Barclays limit? I would love to try and report my results to the group here, but I'm probably still 15 or so AU's away from the limit.
I've never heard it working.
Point of reference: Bank of America shut down all of my accounts, not just those I was selling tradelines on. This included a business account. Thankfully, I wasn't relying on any of them.
Weird. B of A shut down one card of mine, and one of my wife's, but we each have other cards with them, and bank accounts, that we all unaffected.