Clearly by my post number I'm the new kid, but I do have a question...
I've read about 5 of the 29 pages and didn't see anything mentioned about it so I'm guessing nobody has brought it up. But the point of this, from the other person's perspective, is to be able to buy something, on your credit, that they wouldn't normally be able to buy (because they don't have the credit), right?
If that's the case, are we doing the right thing? I'm sure that some people need to build that credit (if that's in fact what's happening, which I haven't confirmed). But there are also some people for sure who aren't able to get that credit for a reason, and what we are doing in signing them up is allowing them to get in over their head from a debt standpoint. Right?
Admittedly, when I read the first post's "Q: Is this ethical? A: That depends..." part, I became instantly skeptical.
But also, I think one of the tenets of MMM is to do things the right way, and not the get-rich-quick or get-rich-off-the-suckers way.
Not trying to throw shade or be a wet blanket, but I'm looking for some clarity on what happens to the other guy (whoever he is). Thanks.
e job here is to sign up people as authorized users on your credit so they can purchase things, right?