Author Topic: Replaced LED light bulbs:  (Read 2448 times)

TreeLeaf

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1550
Replaced LED light bulbs:
« on: December 08, 2022, 03:06:40 PM »
I replaced all the outdoor LED light bulbs at my house with GE dusk to dawn led light bulbs. I will reuse the old bulbs inside the house.

Approximate pay back period is a little over a year.

It sounds silly but I did not think of doing this until I saw these bulbs at the store.

Syonyk

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4610
    • Syonyk's Project Blog
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2022, 04:01:17 PM »
Um.

Ok, maybe you can explain it to me, because this makes no sense to me.  The GE "dusk to dawn" bulbs have a light sensor, presumably, so they automatically turn off.  But you have light switches inside that turn them off too, right?  So how would they save money over just manually turning the lights off?

Or not turning them on in the first place.  I'm rural, and I cannot understand some people's utter phobia of the dark out here.  Light with easily 500W of LEDs on the outside - not 500W incandescent nominal, but they've got at least half a kW of power going to just... lighting the outside of their house.  Or their garage.  I get it, I've got some good LED floods for when I need to light up the driveway at night, but they're almost never actually on.  This house has the things on dusk to dawn, every night, for no apparent reason.  If a particular set of garage outside lights is on, I can literally read by the light, on our property.  I've tried.  And they're pretty far away!

And you can get cheap light timers for outdoor lights, too.  Just toss one of those on the switch and you can have time based lights with the existing bulbs, or anything else you install, without having to buy specific bulbs.

Also, be careful with LEDs,  They're awful for human sleep unless you have some really high end/high CRI ones, and even then, they're worse than incandescents by far, in terms of melatonin suppression in the evenings.  You're fine with them during the day, but at night, you're far better off with dimmed incandescent bulbs, if you want to sleep.  It's not just screens - the white (even the orange-leaning ones) LEDs have a huge spike in the blue spectrum because that's how they work.  Blue LED with phosphor coatings.

TreeLeaf

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2022, 05:31:13 PM »
Um.

Ok, maybe you can explain it to me, because this makes no sense to me.  The GE "dusk to dawn" bulbs have a light sensor, presumably, so they automatically turn off.  But you have light switches inside that turn them off too, right?  So how would they save money over just manually turning the lights off?

Or not turning them on in the first place.  I'm rural, and I cannot understand some people's utter phobia of the dark out here.  Light with easily 500W of LEDs on the outside - not 500W incandescent nominal, but they've got at least half a kW of power going to just... lighting the outside of their house.  Or their garage.  I get it, I've got some good LED floods for when I need to light up the driveway at night, but they're almost never actually on.  This house has the things on dusk to dawn, every night, for no apparent reason.  If a particular set of garage outside lights is on, I can literally read by the light, on our property.  I've tried.  And they're pretty far away!

And you can get cheap light timers for outdoor lights, too.  Just toss one of those on the switch and you can have time based lights with the existing bulbs, or anything else you install, without having to buy specific bulbs.

Also, be careful with LEDs,  They're awful for human sleep unless you have some really high end/high CRI ones, and even then, they're worse than incandescents by far, in terms of melatonin suppression in the evenings.  You're fine with them during the day, but at night, you're far better off with dimmed incandescent bulbs, if you want to sleep.  It's not just screens - the white (even the orange-leaning ones) LEDs have a huge spike in the blue spectrum because that's how they work.  Blue LED with phosphor coatings.

I don't know why your neighbors do this.

I'm married with children. I have to take five other people into account when making decisions.

If you think running lights all night is expensive - you should see the cost of divorce.

My point in making this post is that it's an easy way to save money without doing much of anything if the alternative is running the lights all day.

The pay back period is 14 months in my case so it is an easy win.

If you keep your lights off at night by all means - keep doing that. Hopefully your SO is on board. :)

Morning Glory

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4889
  • Location: The Garden Path
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2022, 05:38:21 PM »
I've always had the outside fixtures with light/motion sensors on them. No need for special bulbs or manually turning anything on/off. The downside is motion sensors always getting set off due to wildlife, but at least they only come on at night. Might be a nice compromise for your wife CG.

Syonyk I use all LEDs in the house because my kids are not good at shutting lights off when they leave a room. Before bed I usually read for ~30 minutes or until I get sleepy using a little reading light with a yellow plastic coating.  Seems to work fine.

I just read a thing about how making leds cheaper caused a lot of people to install more lights instead of actually reducing their power usage, kinda like how adding lanes to a highway induces demand and causes more traffic. Also washing machines led to a cultural shift requiring more frequent clothes washing, so we spend the same amount of time washing clothes as before they were invented. I think it was a chapter in "the day the world stops shopping ".
« Last Edit: December 08, 2022, 05:53:06 PM by Morning Glory »

Syonyk

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4610
    • Syonyk's Project Blog
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2022, 05:50:15 PM »
I'm married with children. I have to take five other people into account when making decisions.

Much the same.  And I do.

Quote
If you think running lights all night is expensive - you should see the cost of divorce.

Your wife will literally divorce you if you don't waste power all night long illuminating the night sky with blue spectrum light that entirely fucks with the mating and navigation of outdoor animals from insects on up, and leave it on dusk until dawn?  M'kay...

Quote
My point in making this post is that it's an easy way to save money without doing much of anything if the alternative is running the lights all day.

Yes, and an even easier way to save money without having to spend money on more crap is to use the light switch.  Turn the lights on in the evening and off when you go to bed.  Or turn them off in the morning.  Or, better, train the rest of your family to do the same, so there are multiple eyes on "saving power without having to buy gadgets to save power."  The payback time on that is zero.

If you leave a hair dryer running all day in your back yard, the solution isn't to buy a photosensor hair dryer, the solution is to not leave the hair dryer running.

Yay, happy clappy, we can buy our way to more energy efficient light pollution!  That's not badassity, that's just consumer suckerism, in full form.  Instead of using an existing light switch, you spent money to buy new crap, that won't last anywhere near the rated lifespan, that's going to be more toxic ewaste in a landfill the future.  Fuck yeah!  At least you don't have to turn the lights off yourself!

A small change jar, filled with a dollar or two weekly, with a coin removed every time I have to turn off one of the lights my kids turned on in their room, has been remarkably effective in getting them trained to turn lights off.  Including outdoor ones.

Quote
The pay back period is 14 months in my case so it is an easy win.

Payback on the light switch is 0 months.

Quote
If you keep your lights off at night by all means - keep doing that. Hopefully your SO is on board. :)

Yes.  She's somewhat more hostile to the concept of stupid outdoor lighting than I am, actually.

Facepunch delivered.

I've always had the fixtures with light/motion sensors on them. No need for special bulbs or manually turning anything on/off. The downside is motion sensors always getting set off due to wildlife, but at least they only come on at night.

Turn them off if you're not using them.  Problem solved!

This forum has gotten soft.

TreeLeaf

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2022, 06:53:02 PM »
I'm married with children. I have to take five other people into account when making decisions.

Much the same.  And I do.

Quote
If you think running lights all night is expensive - you should see the cost of divorce.

Your wife will literally divorce you if you don't waste power all night long illuminating the night sky with blue spectrum light that entirely fucks with the mating and navigation of outdoor animals from insects on up, and leave it on dusk until dawn?  M'kay...

Quote
My point in making this post is that it's an easy way to save money without doing much of anything if the alternative is running the lights all day.

Yes, and an even easier way to save money without having to spend money on more crap is to use the light switch.  Turn the lights on in the evening and off when you go to bed.  Or turn them off in the morning.  Or, better, train the rest of your family to do the same, so there are multiple eyes on "saving power without having to buy gadgets to save power."  The payback time on that is zero.

If you leave a hair dryer running all day in your back yard, the solution isn't to buy a photosensor hair dryer, the solution is to not leave the hair dryer running.

Yay, happy clappy, we can buy our way to more energy efficient light pollution!  That's not badassity, that's just consumer suckerism, in full form.  Instead of using an existing light switch, you spent money to buy new crap, that won't last anywhere near the rated lifespan, that's going to be more toxic ewaste in a landfill the future.  Fuck yeah!  At least you don't have to turn the lights off yourself!

A small change jar, filled with a dollar or two weekly, with a coin removed every time I have to turn off one of the lights my kids turned on in their room, has been remarkably effective in getting them trained to turn lights off.  Including outdoor ones.

Quote
The pay back period is 14 months in my case so it is an easy win.

Payback on the light switch is 0 months.

Quote
If you keep your lights off at night by all means - keep doing that. Hopefully your SO is on board. :)

Yes.  She's somewhat more hostile to the concept of stupid outdoor lighting than I am, actually.

Facepunch delivered.

I've always had the fixtures with light/motion sensors on them. No need for special bulbs or manually turning anything on/off. The downside is motion sensors always getting set off due to wildlife, but at least they only come on at night.

Turn them off if you're not using them.  Problem solved!

This forum has gotten soft.

Relax.

I'm trying to share a simple way to save money on a forum about saving money. That is all.

On the forum getting soft - yeah. This is true. A lot of us are millionaires pulling down over six figures and have largely optimized all the expenses out of our life. I spend a little over 2k / month for six people. Most of this money is spent on healthy food.

I'm deploying software at the moment that is worth about a billion dollars.

I will accept the face punch for 'wasting' $11 dollars on two led light bulbs that saves me tons of time turning lights on and off. This just isn't something I'm going to waste my time on.

Time is worth way more than money.

uniwelder

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1724
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Appalachian Virginia
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2022, 07:36:12 PM »
This forum has gotten soft.

+1  I find it a bit annoying to read posts from people that congratulate themselves for doing silly things.

 
I'm trying to share a simple way to save money on a forum about saving money. That is all.

This forum is supposed to be more than just money.  Its also about reducing consumerism and wastefulness.  Just because you can afford to be wasteful, doesn't mean you should flaunt it.

TreeLeaf

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2022, 07:50:52 PM »
This forum has gotten soft.

+1  I find it a bit annoying to read posts from people that congratulate themselves for doing silly things.

 
I'm trying to share a simple way to save money on a forum about saving money. That is all.

This forum is supposed to be more than just money.  Its also about reducing consumerism and wastefulness.  Just because you can afford to be wasteful, doesn't mean you should flaunt it.

I spent $11 dollars to save 2 minutes of time per day for 22 years. This is about 16,060 minutes. Or about 268 hours.

This is about 4 pennies per hour I would be paying myself to turn lights on and off.

How much is your time worth?

Alternatively if I just leave the lights on the new ones pay for themselves in 14 months.

How well are your investment returns these days?

Are you trying to retire early or save the environment?

TreeLeaf

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2022, 08:14:51 PM »
Actually - since the old outside led bulbs were transferred to the inside of the house to replace two bulbs that died this year, this isn't even hurting the environment. I had to replace those bulbs anyway.

I don't understand how this is seen as a bad thing. Certainly everyone on this forum buys light bulbs.

Do most people on this forum simply leave the lights off at night, I assume?


uniwelder

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1724
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Appalachian Virginia
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2022, 08:31:26 PM »
Actually - since the old outside led bulbs were transferred to the inside of the house to replace two bulbs that died this year, this isn't even hurting the environment. I had to replace those bulbs anyway.

I don't understand how this is seen as a bad thing. Certainly everyone on this forum buys light bulbs.

Do most people on this forum simply leave the lights off at night, I assume?


Yes.  That's what most reasonable people do.

TreeLeaf

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #10 on: December 08, 2022, 08:41:43 PM »
Actually - since the old outside led bulbs were transferred to the inside of the house to replace two bulbs that died this year, this isn't even hurting the environment. I had to replace those bulbs anyway.

I don't understand how this is seen as a bad thing. Certainly everyone on this forum buys light bulbs.

Do most people on this forum simply leave the lights off at night, I assume?


Yes.  That's what most reasonable people do.

Ah - ok. This makes sense. My dad always kept the outside lights on all the time growing up, and the same with my spouse's parents. So we never questioned this practice much.

I will talk with my SO tomorrow about why we need the lights on at night.

Thanks for the clarification.

Syonyk

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4610
    • Syonyk's Project Blog
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #11 on: December 08, 2022, 09:33:19 PM »
Relax.

Oh, I'm relaxed.  This is how I let off steam.  I also give zero fucks anymore, because this forum is no longer in any way aligned with that which I care about, which is reducing consumption, doing work yourself, reducing your environmental footprint, and if you are wealthy as a result of these habits, not being an insufferable smug ass about it.  Which, I will suggest, is exactly what you're doing.

Quote
I'm trying to share a simple way to save money on a forum about saving money. That is all.

No.  You're not.  A simple way to save money if you're in the habit of leaving your outdoor lights on all night is to turn them off.  And leave them off.  You're doing a beautiful demonstration of how to justify spending money by absurd math, loony assumptions, because you want to be lazy.  Fine.  Consumerist Sukka Forum, it is.  You know, if you really wanted to do it better, you could justify a whole lot more.  What about smart bulbs?  And then some wifi extenders to do that?  Plus, the surveillence hub microphone systems in your house.  And, hey, while you're at it, a new phone to better make use of those smart things!  Hey, you're saving money by turning the lights off, never mind the environmental and direct financial costs of all that, the data extraction to manipulate you and your family from all the data collected, everything else.  You'd get the lights turned off that way, too!

Quote
On the forum getting soft - yeah. This is true. A lot of us are millionaires pulling down over six figures and have largely optimized all the expenses out of our life. I spend a little over 2k / month for six people. Most of this money is spent on healthy food.

Great.  So you should, somewhere in there, be able to find some time to turn the lights off with the switch.  I recently splurged on a couple nice motion sensor outdoor LEDs to improve lighting in our driveway, because we've been having a bunch of people over regularly and it makes it easier in the winter for people to get in/out of our driveway, load cars, etc.  But they also remain almost entirely off, even with the motion/light sensor feature, unless we actually need them.  They're not mindlessly lighting the night, they're providing more light for the driveway during specific times when they're needed, and even then we let the motion sensors do their thing so they're not blazing away all evening pointlessly.

We over-light the ever loving hell out of homes, which is bad enough, but then we do it to the outside too, which is incredibly wasteful, and absolutely evil to animals.  Throughout the entire animal kingdom, artifical human lighting screws with their ability to live and reproduce.  Why?  So we can sleep to a bright back yard?  Nonsense.  Light pollution is horrid for humans too.

Your eyes are amazing.  They adjust over something like a million to 1 contrast ratio, and when properly adjusted, are capable of detecting single digit numbers of photons - and also work at noon day sun intensities.  Let them work!  A dim light, or some deeply dimmed bulbs, or a kerosene lantern are more than enough for useful illumination at night, and, in the process, don't ruin your sleep.  I've heard claims that in a properly dark, open environment, the light of Venus is enough to navigate by.

Quote
I'm deploying software at the moment that is worth about a billion dollars.

Good boy!  Wow.  You must be so fucking important!  So important.  Much executive!  Smug asshole!  I mean, I guess in the context of that, the energy you waste lighting your yard isn't a big deal, given all the data centers and clients and everything that will run that super expensive, very important software.  But, seriously, who are you trying to impress?  Sure as hell not me.

Quote
I will accept the face punch for 'wasting' $11 dollars on two led light bulbs that saves me tons of time turning lights on and off. This just isn't something I'm going to waste my time on.

Time is worth way more than money.

I won't argue.  So if you're already a millionaire or multi-millionaire, why not cut back on work?  Work a 24 or 32 hour week.  That'll free up way more time in your week than a stupid automatic light bulb.  Why, you might even have time to flip a light switch for yourself!

I spent $11 dollars to save 2 minutes of time per day for 22 years. This is about 16,060 minutes. Or about 268 hours.

Oh man.  Justification math at its finest.  So the lights aren't even at doors you use?  You have to go out of your way, all the way across your house, to turn the lights on and off?  I can tell you that "Glance at the switch as you go past the door" doesn't take a minute, since I do it somewhat regularly.  Also, there's no way those bulbs will actually last 22 years.  I don't care what it says on the plastic blister package.  Consumer electronics just aren't built that way anymore, haven't been for a while.  So, you'll almost certainly have to replace them at least once in that lifetime, if not more than once (my experience with LED bulb reliability has been poor - and the dimmable ones are worse).

Quote
How much is your time worth?

You can justify all sorts of stupid crap that way.  It's a dumb path to go down.  So don't do it.  You're smart enough to deploy a billion, with a B, dollars worth of software, you should be able to figure out just how much of that falls into "consumer sucker" category.  But you're in good company, don't worry.

Quote
Alternatively if I just leave the lights on the new ones pay for themselves in 14 months.

Turn them off, and they pay your time the first night or so.

Quote
How well are your investment returns these days?

Not great, though the returns on my self-built solar array remain consistent.  But neither am I trying to justify stupid purchases with a pay-back period.

Quote
Are you trying to retire early or save the environment?

And this is the core of my objections here.  We know that we're all collectively buying too much crap.  Strip mining, mountaintop removal, the wastes from processing (China is cheap partly because you can literally just leave your slag heap anywhere, who cares if there was a village there, they're too dumb to have gotten out of the way), slave labor, the destruction of ocean life (the sounds of shipping are so loud that entire categories of marine animal are having trouble actually hearing each other enough to mate and have babies or to find their family afterwards)... I mean, hell, what does it matter if we've made some good profits in the meanwhile?



[meme] But why not both?  Spend less money and have less environmental impact by not buying shit you don't need to solve problems you shouldn't have!

I don't understand how this is seen as a bad thing. Certainly everyone on this forum buys light bulbs.

Again, it's amazing how little light you really need, though I certainly have gone through light bulbs.  Lately, my analysis has been digging into just how much blue comes out of the white LEDs, and the answer is "A lot.  More than enough to screw with human sleep.  We probably shouldn't be using them at night.  Daytime is fine, when we don't need them, but once the sun's down, LEDs in the house are clearly demonstrated to screw with human sleep, badly."

Quote
Do most people on this forum simply leave the lights off at night, I assume?

Yes.  I wish, so badly, my neighbors would do so too.  I like the Milky Way outside in my yard.  If I have lights on at night, outside, it's because someone is doing something that actively requires illumination - kids on the playground in the dark, or people getting stuff loaded into cars in the driveway.  Or... well, that's about it, really.  There's no reason to have them on at night.

Anyway, sorry, not particularly picking on you, but this forum has just gotten absurd lately, and this is the one that struck me as the most absurd.  Not that car threads are any better.  "My unreliable 10 year old, 100,000 mile Toyota is just an unreliable piece of junk because I never maintain it or even check the oil, what new car should I buy instead?"

MoseyingAlong

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 417
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #12 on: December 08, 2022, 10:34:33 PM »
......
Do most people on this forum simply leave the lights off at night, I assume?

@curious_george If you want to know more about this, I highly recommend searching for info about light pollution.
I wish more people would reduce their outside lights or, at least, make sure they are shielded to only point down. No need to light the clouds.

rosarugosa

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 358
  • Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2022, 03:54:00 AM »
......
Do most people on this forum simply leave the lights off at night, I assume?

@curious_george If you want to know more about this, I highly recommend searching for info about light pollution.
I wish more people would reduce their outside lights or, at least, make sure they are shielded to only point down. No need to light the clouds.

This is honestly kind of a sore spot for us as well.  We have two small lights, one at the front door and one at the back door (manual light switches) that are used only occasionally, and that has worked for us for over 35 years.  We have neighbors with spotlights shining all night, and while my primary concern is for nature (migrating birds and butterflies, summer fireflies), I also object to them when I'm trying to look at the stars at night. We're hoping that the recent enormous increase in electricity costs will prompt them to rethink this waste of energy.

TreeLeaf

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2022, 04:02:18 AM »
@Syonyk - ok - I understand what you are saying here.

Sorry you find me so incredibly offensive. If it makes you feel better, I do drive a 16 year old Toyota which I maintain myself, and ride an ebike. I also handle my own plumbing and electrical in my house, and used to fix up foreclosed houses myself. I was not always the millionaire software engineer working on billion dollar software. In fact I started out incredibly broke out of foster care.

We used to spend $1,000 / month for a family of four...a number which is unheard of on this forum. The only way I got where I am today is by obsessively saving money and working hard.

But yeah - now that I am here I have gotten soft. I am more tempted to just take the car to the shop instead of replacing the cv axles myself. It's more tempting to simply hire someone else to replace the well pump when it fails instead of taking time off work to replace it myself. Likewise with the roof. I have replaced roofs myself before, and could have done the job myself over several days, but it was easier to just pay someone else to do it.

I justify this to myself by saying - well - I have tons of money now so I might as well spend it on something to make my life easier or more enjoyable. Perhaps this is the wrong justification, as I could just as easily use this justification to buy a brand new truck with heated seats and four wheel drive...something which I used to always make fun of other people for doing.

My expenses have more than doubled over the years. I'm ashamed to say I even have a ymca pass now, despite also having a home gym. That is an easy 70 dollars every month I could save. My kids even have netflix now, whereas before I did not even own a tv for several years. This is more money I waste. We also eat all healthy organic food, grass fed meat, etc. I could easily go back to our diet of peanut butter sandwiches, oatmeal, and ramen noodles.

Turning off two lights at night won't save a lot. They use 8 watts each. The dollar sign is pretty small - this is just one of those things I have never optimized before because we're talking about pennies here.

But you're definitely correct - these should simply be turned off at night.

Thank you for the face punches.

GilesMM

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1557
  • Location: PNW
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #15 on: December 09, 2022, 07:11:38 AM »
Good topic. We have a number of outdoor lights which are on a dusk-to-dawn sensor but has struck me as a bit much at times in our semi-rural setting.  Our electricity runs $0.10/kwh (although we are on solar also) so lighting a 9w LED 12 hours/d for a year would cost us about $4/yr or a penny per day.  Ours are a warmish 2700k color and point down from can lights or covered sidewalk posts so any upward light pollution would be reflected off the driveway/sidewalk. I would guess we are illuminating maybe 5% of our property so overall things are pretty dark out there. If the lights discourage deer, coyotes, raccoons, squirrels and bobcats from vandalizing things near the house, I'm happy with that (but can't say they do).  I put WiFi bulbs in three stands outside the bedrooms so when I say tell Google "goodnight" they go off, but those are spendy bulbs and I'm paying for convenience more than saving electricity.   I wonder if I could install a timer on the dusk-to-dawn master switch to turn off the outdoor lights from, say, 11 pm-6am.

achvfi

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 542
  • Location: Midwest
  • Health is wealth
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #16 on: December 09, 2022, 12:39:08 PM »
Nice work!

I replaced all our lights with LEDs 10 years ago when I bought our home. Its been good investment reducing cost and energy usage. In those days LED lights were given away, almost free. Due to utility and govt programs. I still have couple of boxes of LEDs bulbs left.

All our indoor lights are smart bulbs. Every evening all are set lowest brightness automatically.  Our door lights are just like yours.

sonofsven

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2056
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #17 on: December 10, 2022, 07:06:47 AM »
In my county a new part of the development code for new construction entails the requirements for outside lighting based on the emerging  concern of "too much" light, to only allow lighting that shades the bulb. Of course, this doesn't apply to all the existing lights. And if you want to change after you build, no one is stopping you.
But I see a lot less of the old sodium "yard lights" and more led lights, I'm sure due to lower operating cost.
I'm on a gravel road, no street lights, few neighbors, and it's dark here! I have a light (led, 60 watt equivalent) in my woodshed that has been on for years, mainly to dissuade animals, but also to highlight any ax murderer that might be lurking (it is where I store my axes, after all). My shop/pole barn has three small led spots, all facing down, just to illuminate the doors.
Then I have a string of led xmas lights on my front porch on a sensor. I like them year round: cheerful, and also illuminating my front door when my porch light is off. Plus, I'm way ahead during the holidays. String lights? Already done ;-).
I love all the new led options. On the house I just finished I put in some fancy Costco exterior led lights that you can control from your phone: change colors and put on time schedules. Green? Purple? Red (heehee)? No problem.

Wolfpack Mustachian

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1868
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #18 on: December 10, 2022, 07:56:13 AM »
Just want to chime in thanks for the info on light pollution and problems with animal life. I don't use outdoor lights, but it could come in handy for taking to someone else about it in the future.

labrador

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #19 on: December 10, 2022, 01:52:45 PM »
Thanks for the info - we live rurally as well and have 2 lights outside our garage that are on motion sensors, otherwise no general outside lighting. We had 2 of those god-awful sodium lamps (one for the driveway and one on our barn) when we moved in years ago, but they thankfully died and have been replaced by...darkness. However, our covered front patio has a light that stays on 24/7. It allows us to more easily see the lock when we get home in the dark, and it also keeps the porch area lit at night to dissuade unwanted middle-of-the-night human visitors (a disturbingly common occurrence in our area due to social issues that we could go on about all day). I am somewhat bothered with having the light on in the daylight (stupid and wasteful), but want it on when I return home in the dark, so there you have it. I am going to go look for those dusk to dawn lights this weekend.

TreeLeaf

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #20 on: December 10, 2022, 04:23:29 PM »
Thanks for the info - we live rurally as well and have 2 lights outside our garage that are on motion sensors, otherwise no general outside lighting. We had 2 of those god-awful sodium lamps (one for the driveway and one on our barn) when we moved in years ago, but they thankfully died and have been replaced by...darkness. However, our covered front patio has a light that stays on 24/7. It allows us to more easily see the lock when we get home in the dark, and it also keeps the porch area lit at night to dissuade unwanted middle-of-the-night human visitors (a disturbingly common occurrence in our area due to social issues that we could go on about all day). I am somewhat bothered with having the light on in the daylight (stupid and wasteful), but want it on when I return home in the dark, so there you have it. I am going to go look for those dusk to dawn lights this weekend.

You're welcome.

This is why I made this thread. I don't care how many haters there are - at the end of the day some people will benefit from the information and it's an easy way to save money on electric for someone who needs to run lights at night but don't want them running during the day. This also reduces electric consumption, green house gases, is a way better roi than the stock market, and requires no effort after the bulb is changed.

Some of us have had our houses broken into before and had thousands of dollars in losses. Until someone has had this happen to them I would not be so quick to hate people who have lights, security cameras, locks on their doors, and who own guns, etc.

Sometimes it feels like I'm the only person on this forum who grew up in foster care in the ghetto. Maybe some of my ideas and paranoia don't apply to the people on this forum. Maybe it does not even apply to my current life. In the ghetto you *always* wanted to make sure your house appears to be occupied, because every vacant house was broken into and stripped of everything including their copper pipes and wiring. Many of them were then burned to the ground. One easy way to tell if a house was vacant is if the electric is turned off and there are no lights on, noise, etc.

Sorry for the rant - I'm just surprised at some of the initial negativity in this thread. It seems like a lot of people on this forum have never experienced much crime in their life or interacted with criminally minded people much and can't comprehend that other people did not grow up in similarly privileged circumstances.

Morning Glory

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4889
  • Location: The Garden Path
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #21 on: December 10, 2022, 06:30:43 PM »
There are threads on politics and religion less contentious than this one. Never would have thought light bulbs would be the new 'early mortgage payoff' smh.

TreeLeaf

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #22 on: December 10, 2022, 07:00:27 PM »
There are threads on politics and religion less contentious than this one. Never would have thought light bulbs would be the new 'early mortgage payoff' smh.

I know right? I debated even starting this thread because it seemed so trivial. It's an 8 watt light bulb. Then I noticed around 1 in 3 houses in my neighborhood run lights all day and night, so figured I would mention it here in case someone else was doing this here and would prefer to only run lights at night. Every house here has their normal lights, plus a post light out by the sidewalk, plus there are street lights everywhere. This subdivision is so lit up at night some of us take walks after sunset and you can see just fine because most everyone has their post lights on that cover the sidewalks. I had to install some nice blackout curtains everywhere in my house just to block out all the lights at night. It's basically always daylight here.

Maybe I should just ask the mods to delete this thread so I can start a political thread instead. I mean, I would rather argue about why college educated women initiate something like 90% of divorces in their marriages than light bulbs.

https://www.irwinirwin.com/why-do-women-initiate-divorce-more-than-men/

Maybe we can argue about this instead, lol.

Edit: Just to clarify - this is a joke. It's a joke. I was just trying to think of something that would be contentious. I'm a simple man in a simple world and I did two loads of dishes today and made the kids lunch and got my star today.

« Last Edit: December 10, 2022, 08:07:05 PM by curious_george »

Jon Bon

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1667
  • Location: Midwest
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #23 on: December 10, 2022, 08:44:18 PM »
I am kind of with you, not sure why they came at your for 2 LED light bulbs? Like really guys? I believe the first rule of this form is to not be a dick, so there is that.

My first FIRE move was to replace a bunch of incandescents in my house with a box of CFLs I had laying around (yeah I'm getting old I guess?). So I totally get the intention.  I mention this because making small steps to save money is a serious part of being FIRE. You cant do the big things without the small things.

Leaving lights on all night is not really my thing, but I have done it from time to time. If your cutting your costs good on you.




jinga nation

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2708
  • Age: 247
  • Location: 'Murica's Dong
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #24 on: December 11, 2022, 04:01:52 PM »
Good boy!  Wow.  You must be so fucking important!  So important.  Much executive!  Smug asshole!  I mean, I guess in the context of that, the energy you waste lighting your yard isn't a big deal, given all the data centers and clients and everything that will run that super expensive, very important software.  But, seriously, who are you trying to impress?  Sure as hell not me.

for a guy who does church work (https://www.sevarg.net/tag/churchplanting/) you sure have forgotten Luke 6:31 and Matthew 7:12 aka the Golden Rule (https://www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/questions/golden-rule/)

but having seen your other post, it seems that LEDs were the final straw. sucks to see you go, as i enjoyed reading your posts on digital privacy, linux, tech, solar, etc. you're a good dude inside. wish you all the best.

eyesonthehorizon

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1035
  • Location: Texas
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #25 on: December 11, 2022, 05:50:30 PM »
While I think it's probably uncontroversial to state that an ideal world would involve turning off lights whenever they will not be in active use, there's a big spectrum of levels of laxity to strictness to badassity here & I'd settle for people influencing their neighbors in a positive direction. The number of lights in my neighborhood which burn 24/7 - not even downcast, but naked bulbs spraying photons pointlessly in every direction, including onto all my bedroom windows - makes me insane, to say nothing of the june bugs, fireflies, & lacewings.

I've lived in some rough neighborhoods & mine now is very much not one - but even where it's important to look occupied, I'd always thought an indoor light, shining around obscuring curtains or through blinds, would be the more valuable signal; I was taught that not using a timer in the evening if you were out all but guaranteed you'd be broken into.

When I gained control of my own outdoor lighting I looked into it & it seemed the data on break-ins don't show very strongly that outdoor lights hinder thieves, with some argument it just helps them break in faster - but of course it depends on local conditions. When "no outdoor light" can almost only mean "no power at this address," the language is different from a wealthy neighborhood where you're more likely to look for always-on lights as a sign someone's on vacation. A neighborhood outreach to approximately synchronize a change of lighting culture on a given street at once might help with that.

Evenings here we use either one or sometimes two very deep amber LED lights burning indoors at a given time, & that's about it. I really like the change compared to where I grew up.

TreeLeaf

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1550
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #26 on: December 11, 2022, 07:41:08 PM »
While I think it's probably uncontroversial to state that an ideal world would involve turning off lights whenever they will not be in active use, there's a big spectrum of levels of laxity to strictness to badassity here & I'd settle for people influencing their neighbors in a positive direction. The number of lights in my neighborhood which burn 24/7 - not even downcast, but naked bulbs spraying photons pointlessly in every direction, including onto all my bedroom windows - makes me insane, to say nothing of the june bugs, fireflies, & lacewings.

I've lived in some rough neighborhoods & mine now is very much not one - but even where it's important to look occupied, I'd always thought an indoor light, shining around obscuring curtains or through blinds, would be the more valuable signal; I was taught that not using a timer in the evening if you were out all but guaranteed you'd be broken into.

When I gained control of my own outdoor lighting I looked into it & it seemed the data on break-ins don't show very strongly that outdoor lights hinder thieves, with some argument it just helps them break in faster - but of course it depends on local conditions. When "no outdoor light" can almost only mean "no power at this address," the language is different from a wealthy neighborhood where you're more likely to look for always-on lights as a sign someone's on vacation. A neighborhood outreach to approximately synchronize a change of lighting culture on a given street at once might help with that.

Evenings here we use either one or sometimes two very deep amber LED lights burning indoors at a given time, & that's about it. I really like the change compared to where I grew up.

Yeah - I agree - I think this is situational dependent also. Especially with respect to crime.

For context I grew up in a poor inner city area where you can buy houses for back taxes owed on the property. When I was in foster care my neighbor paid $3,000 dollars for his house. That is not a typo. The house was later burned to the ground by vandals who broke in while he was on vacation. People breaking into houses was so common it was expected. Our house was broken into about a dozen times and our detached garage was burned to the ground by ... someone. Out of 50 houses on the street about a dozen have been burned down and another 20 are vacant and stripped of anything of value. We could leave to go to the grocery store and come back and half of our shit would be stolen. This was the ghetto.

As an adult my first house was $28,000 dollars in what you may think of as a rough neighborhood. My cars were broken into there but thankfully not my house. My neighbors truck there was stolen from his own driveway while he was at home asleep by some college kids who took it joy riding. Luckily the police found it.

Now I live in ... well what I consider a 'nice' neighborhood. You may think this is a rough neighborhood. My current house has only been broken into once and stripped of everything of value...and it was technically before I bought the house while it was a vacant bank owned property. So I - especially - am extremely aware of not making my house appear vacant. I have four children, and I don't want them to suffer the same traumas I suffered growing up.

A lot of places run street lights at night also, and there have been various studies showing the safety improvement of running street lights at night. If you click on this website and click on 'download the fact sheet' you can see what I mean. I would argue that human lives are more important than saving money.

https://www.rospa.com/road-safety/advice/roads/street-lighting

I mean - I think ideally no one would run lights unless they were needed by someone to see ... but ideally crime would not exist and people would respect other people and people who go to church would actually follow Christ's example, and people would not abuse other people.... We don't live in an ideal world...

Anyway - my point is - this depends on the area, the person, and what they value even. It's not black and white.

Or perhaps it is black and white, and I just haven't read the book on lights yet..idk. This isn't really a subject I have read a lot of scientific studies on and I'm certainly open to changing my opinion.

Stepping outside of my house right now, and looking around, every house that I can see is running exterior lights. In addition there are street lights, christmas lights, blazingly bright security lights that some people run all night.

Perhaps there are some studies on exterior lighting that I should read.

jeninco

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4051
  • Location: .... duh?
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #27 on: December 12, 2022, 10:36:35 AM »
Yeah, the different perspectives on this issue have been fascinating to read. And I very much understand that if you're in a place that's rural, you'd want to enjoy the dark night skies! And if you're in a place that's urban, you want your house to look occupied.

We live in a pretty good neighborhood in an extremely upscale college town, and we've split the difference by having a couple of lights on both light- and motion- sensors. Having the front door light on a sensor means that it turns on when someone approaches the front porch (so we can see who's there, and also so we can find our keys when we come in that way), and there are two more that light up as you walk around to the back of the house -- which serve both as a crime deterrent (we think!) and to make it easy to park bikes around back (where they get locked up, under an overhanging roof, year round). But there is a streetlight two houses down from us, and another two houses up, so it's not like our motion-triggered light are substantially changing the light situation in our neighborhood. (and don't even get me started on the round-the-corner neighbors holiday decorations, which can probably be seen from space!)

TomTX

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5345
  • Location: Texas
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #28 on: January 01, 2023, 11:22:06 AM »
Also, be careful with LEDs,  They're awful for human sleep unless you have some really high end/high CRI ones, and even then, they're worse than incandescents by far, in terms of melatonin suppression in the evenings.  You're fine with them during the day, but at night, you're far better off with dimmed incandescent bulbs, if you want to sleep.  It's not just screens - the white (even the orange-leaning ones) LEDs have a huge spike in the blue spectrum because that's how they work.  Blue LED with phosphor coatings.
While high color temperature (ie bluer) LED bulbs do have a big spike of blue - the  "warm white" color LEDs generally don't have much blue, and actually have less blue than daylight:


TomTX

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5345
  • Location: Texas
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #29 on: January 01, 2023, 11:25:36 AM »
Actually - since the old outside led bulbs were transferred to the inside of the house to replace two bulbs that died this year, this isn't even hurting the environment. I had to replace those bulbs anyway.

I don't understand how this is seen as a bad thing. Certainly everyone on this forum buys light bulbs.

Do most people on this forum simply leave the lights off at night, I assume?


Yes.  That's what most reasonable people do.
Well, since my outside lights are all motion activated - I just leave the switch to "On". I did have one non-sensing fixture out there - rather than replace the fixture, I just purchased a $10 LED bulb with an embedded motion sensor. Indoor lights get switched off.

uniwelder

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1724
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Appalachian Virginia
Re: Replaced LED light bulbs:
« Reply #30 on: January 01, 2023, 01:31:15 PM »
Actually - since the old outside led bulbs were transferred to the inside of the house to replace two bulbs that died this year, this isn't even hurting the environment. I had to replace those bulbs anyway.

I don't understand how this is seen as a bad thing. Certainly everyone on this forum buys light bulbs.

Do most people on this forum simply leave the lights off at night, I assume?


Yes.  That's what most reasonable people do.
Well, since my outside lights are all motion activated - I just leave the switch to "On". I did have one non-sensing fixture out there - rather than replace the fixture, I just purchased a $10 LED bulb with an embedded motion sensor. Indoor lights get switched off.

I’m not sure why you’re quoting me. I was responding to someone who keeps the light on through the whole night, as opposed to a light that is motion activated. Apples and oranges.

 

Wow, a phone plan for fifteen bucks!