Sadly, we speak to people not computers and if multiple people misunderstand us then we must accept that perhaps our words could have been better chosen.
We must accept no such thing. What is this premise based on? The sentence in question is easily understandable by anyone who knows and understands what the words mean.
Myself, I can certainly see how there would be confusion with the phrase "for some reason women" being supposed to mean "some women in my experience." Consider the sentence" for some reason dogs seem to love bacon." People would understandably assume you were making a general statement about most dogs and not specifying merely an observation of some dogs you have personally known.
There's just one glaring problem with your thought process here: I didn't just write "for some reason women" , I actually DID write "For some reason women SEEM to love to leave every light in the house on all day every day."
So the latter half of your argument there is actually in SUPPORT of what I have been saying!
You can't properly quote a sentence from half a page up and yet your assertion is that the misunderstandings are MY responsibility?
I think you could also forgive people for being confused why you even made the comment if you're just talking about personal experience and not making a generalization from it. In my experience, my roommates with brown eyes have not been as good about doing their dishes as my roommates with blue eyes. But I wouldn't start off an anecdote that way unless I associated some significance with it.
The fact that its personal experience is exactly why I WOULD mention it. This is a post about something that happened in my life, and my motivations for doing something. Why would I leave out my personal opinions?
And what if I do associate some significance to it? Am I just not 'allowed' to say it?
You quite obviously feel that if something might be found offensive I shouldn't say it, even if I have found it to be true (personally, myself, in my experience, with me, in my own life)
I am simply not interested in walking on eggshells around everybody. No anger involved, I just have no need to censor myself to appease people who are simply addicted to outrage.
So, there you go. Some feedback so you can avoid the problem in the future.
No need, Its not a problem for me. I am not upset. I accept that no matter what I say some percentage of people isn't going to like it. I don't have any need to feel like everybody likes me or agrees with me. Its actually liberating. You should try it. Going through life constantly worried about what other people think is a miserable way to live.
No one is trying to put words in your mouth. This is an internet forum and none of us is being paid to write professionally here, so there is nothing wrong with clarifying what you meant. Accusing people of being butthurt thought police is an over reaction and not conducive to communication IMO.
I have no need to clarify. I wrote exactly what I meant to say and it was perfectly clear to anybody with basic reading comprehension.
Its very simple: You don't like what I said, and instead of admitting that it is clear that I was presenting my personal experience you and several other posters want me to denounce what I said in the interests of "clarifying" or "avoiding future problems".
I appreciate the concern, but I am just not worried about it.