We have a 3 br/3 bath home in north Los Angeles that we've outgrown, so looking to buy something else in the area and considering renting our existing house. We're a couple in our 40s (with a young child), enjoy our jobs, and we live well below our means.
House Market Value: 1 million
Original Purchase price: $400k
Existing mortgage: $240k, 19 years left of a 20-year loan at 3.125%
P&I: $1400/month
T&I: $800/month
Deferred maintenance notes: We would need to put in $20-50k of work whether we sell or rent (and have the cash for it)
Potential rent: 2 scenarios. Renting whole house ~$5k month; Or, we could easily split one room into an EDU and rent as two units (guessing ~$4k + $1,500), but would need to add a kitchen to the EDU.
I can get into the numbers of what we're looking to buy if needed, but PITI would be $5k/month at worst and probably $3k at best, and in both scenarios we can continue our one-salary lifestyle. I'm already leaning towards selling vs renting for a few reasons: 1. the idea of owning two properties ($2 million+ in value) in an earthquake-prone area is a lot of risk. Earthquake damage deductible is 10%, and our total assets are probably $1.5 million (with $1 million from the house). 2. If I were to consider an investment property at this point in my life (as someone new to it), I'm not sure holding a $1 million property would be the best way to go about it (thoughts?)
We're not keen to spend our time being landlords, finding tenants, etc, and I wouldn't be surprised if property management here is pricier. I'm wondering if another investment opportunity would be a better vehicle for the money - maybe taking $400k from the sale and buying property somewhere else (and have it managed), or just $100k into index funds and the rest into the new loan. From an investment standpoint, I'm not sure if the best use of the money is to put all of it into a single new loan, but I'm not really sure how to do the math to figure out the most advantageous solution.