Hi All,
again, thanks so much for the replies. I definitely felt better today and spent most of the day getting mortgage quotes from brokers, banks, and online lenders.
To be more specific on my financials, my family earns $165k per year plus another $15k in 401k matches. I consider ourselves very fortunate! Over the past year, we've saved up from 40k to 80k in cash, but the day before we found our house we put 10k into our tIRAs for 2016 (max allowable given our income, which was smaller this year due to a promotion I received towards the end of the year). I also have a small amount ~20k in Roth IRAs. So, as for liquidity: 70k cash, 20k Roth. We live in a very cheap rental house that we will grow out of very soon (kids and all). We currently pay $1,150/mo, not including utilities. I would guess our total housing budget (rent/mortgage, tax, insurance, utilities, maintenance) will increase a little over 2x. I would like to stay below 3k/mo, but that may depend a lot on maintenance needs.
The house is a very unmustachian 430k. It's priced due to its great location and updated features. We will be able to walk everywhere we need, aside from my 15m daily commute. We also will likely never need to update it, remodel it, or do anything beyond upkeep. But, I do feel weird spending so much on a house and have this feeling of having to justify the purchase to myself, which is silly. We live in a low-ish COL city. Houses on the periphery can be had for 200, fancy houses in the fancy neighborhoods go for 500ish, and the houses in our neighborhood go from around 300 for 1200 sq.ft. to not much more than ours at 2,400 sq.ft. The square feet is inflated for ours as it has a 400 sq. ft. guest house in the back that we will mostly keep unheated except when guests are visiting. The main house is quite compact, but has a layout that matched just what we were looking for. Anyway, here I go justifying it again...
So, we can go 43k down for 10% with a nice amount of cash buffer after closing costs and escrow. We can try for 65k, but that would involve borrowing from family or liquidating the Roth, neither really worth it. Then there's the full 20% at 86k which is just not obtainable once you add in closing costs, escrow, and a reasonable amount left over to live on. In most cases, it seems that the difference between 90/10 loans and 85/15 loans is only the PMI, so given that we can get the same rate, we'll probably simply put 10% down.
I have been somewhat active on the mortgage threads. I am 'volatility tolerant' and definitely plan on riding out the mortgage for the long run. To that end, I did get quotes today and asked for 90/10s, 85/15s, and 80/10/10s. My wife and I do have 800ish credit and no debt, so I assume we're getting good rates.
Just about every local broker came back with 4.125% for no points, and around a 4.25ish APR. The online company I found through Zillow's search came back with a 3.625% rate, but then didn't report their APR and quoted a P&I pretty much in line with the others. For the 10% down, we're looking at $1,870/mo and for the 15% down we're looking at $1,740/mo plus or minus. Meh, I was hoping for high 3s at this point, but that just doesn't seem available. PMI was pretty much always $90/mo for the 90/10 and $60/mo for the 85/15. My contact at our FCU is out until Monday, so I'll call him then, but I think he was going to be pretty much in line with everyone else. Any thoughts here?
As for the 80-10-10... I must be confused, because I did get quotes and they didn't look good. But maybe I'm not looking at them the right way. Not one of the people I talked to offered piggyback loans in-house. They all sub-contracted the 10% loan out to another company. Then, they took the rate on the outstanding 80 and raised it an eighth or a quarter. But... it does result in a lower premium once the piggyback loan is cleared? Specifically, I have a quote for an 80-10-10 at 4.25% with an APR of 4.375% for a P&I of $1,688/mo, which is better, but then this one also happened to have 1.5k of points added in, which deflates the rates by an eighth I think. Of course, the catch is that the extra loan adds another $350 to the monthly. I guess the trick is that if we can pay it back quick, then we benefit, otherwise it's not worth it.
But, that gets back to the whole mortgage payoff game. If we're going to commit to pumping extra money into the mortage at least to get 20% (or 22%) in to stop PMI, wouldn't it still be better to just throw that money into index funds? Granted, 90/mo in PMI does suck... so maybe it's worth it to get rid of PMI. We do earn good money, so it's probably possible for us to pay it down relatively quickly. Not sure we could do it in a year, but in two or less for sure, but meanwhile instead of paying 90/mo extra, we're paying $350/mo extra (although that is part of the loan, not just worthless PMI). We'd need to throw 2k/mo at it, which would likely mean not hitting our tax-advantaged 401k contributions.
So, thank you so much for your attention. I think some of my anxiety is that MMM just speaks to me very strongly and I feel I'm falling off the wagon with this one. But, we are buying a wonderful but not opulent house in an extremely walkable neighborhood that we love, so there! I'd be happy to hear any thoughts about whether all of this mathy stuff sounds right. If there were sub-4 APRs out there for people with top credit, I would certainly love to hear about it. The one quoted directly on the Zillow site did not line up with my quote from the agent I contacted directly, so given that I'm kind of assuming they're all pretty close, which makes sense. Any other tips on mortgage shopping would certainly be appreciated as well!
Thanks again.