Author Topic: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.  (Read 2203 times)

jnw

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2063
I was paying $1250 per year and all of a sudden this year they want $1750  -- wowsers.  The rebuild cost is only around $188k max.

For the longest time the deductibles have been $5k wind/hail roof (actual cost not replacement cost) along with $1k for all other peril. 

But I decided to go with the mortgage company's minimum requirement of 5% of dwelling cost (or replacement cost -- whatever it's called).   So going with $188k replacement cost, the deductible, across the board is $9400 -- big jump from $1000 for all peril.

But it gets the annual coverage fee down to $801.  This includes $1M in personal liability coverage -- was an extra $15 per year to go from $500k to $1M.. Figured it was worth the extra $15 per year.

So what do you think?  Would you pay $950 more per year for $5000/$1000 deductible coverage vs $9400/$9400 deductible?  Over ten years it's a savings of $9500.

I can't get myself to pay $1750, that's crazy.

ChpBstrd

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8321
  • Location: A poor and backward Southern state known as minimum wage country
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2023, 02:38:25 PM »
How many quotes did you get?

jnw

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2063
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2023, 02:40:04 PM »
How many quotes did you get?

A few, this one was the most affordable, I just went with it. It was with my existing insurance company -- a respectable large well known insurance company.   I checked several places for the $5000/1000 coverage and they all wanted around $1700+.

Got tired of checking around.  I suppose in a couple months I could resume checking, I just needed a break and had to get something for now.  So went with $801 for $9400/$9400 deductibles.

(I live in one of the more expenseive states for homeowner's insurance, due to wind damage etc.)

I'd love to get this down to $500 if I could somehow :)
« Last Edit: August 21, 2023, 02:44:48 PM by jnw »

MrGreen

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4622
  • Age: 41
  • Location: Wilmington, NC
  • FIREd in 2017
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2023, 02:45:39 PM »
Well you're risking an extra ~$8400 per claim to save $950 per year. Make no claims in 9 years and you win. Of course that assumes the spread between what you selected and what they would have otherwise charged you stays the same. I'd guess you'll come out ahead on this one.

clarkfan1979

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3556
  • Age: 45
  • Location: Pueblo West, CO
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #4 on: August 21, 2023, 08:05:22 PM »
I was paying $1250 per year and all of a sudden this year they want $1750  -- wowsers.  The rebuild cost is only around $188k max.

For the longest time the deductibles have been $5k wind/hail roof (actual cost not replacement cost) along with $1k for all other peril. 

But I decided to go with the mortgage company's minimum requirement of 5% of dwelling cost (or replacement cost -- whatever it's called).   So going with $188k replacement cost, the deductible, across the board is $9400 -- big jump from $1000 for all peril.

But it gets the annual coverage fee down to $801.  This includes $1M in personal liability coverage -- was an extra $15 per year to go from $500k to $1M.. Figured it was worth the extra $15 per year.

So what do you think?  Would you pay $950 more per year for $5000/$1000 deductible coverage vs $9400/$9400 deductible?  Over ten years it's a savings of $9500.

I can't get myself to pay $1750, that's crazy.

My insurance for my Fort Myers, FL rental has gone as follows. House is worth around 375K. Not sure of the replacement cost of the policy at the moment. Hurricane Ian hit in September 2022 and my house didn't have any damage. However, my roof needed to be replaced because it was 19 years old, so I got a new roof in March 2023. The latest policy in 2023 is with a new roof. 

2020: $950/year
2021: $1450/year
2022: $2166/year
2023: $3250/year

GilesMM

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2546
  • Location: PNW
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2023, 09:41:57 PM »
I was paying $1250 per year and all of a sudden this year they want $1750  -- wowsers.  The rebuild cost is only around $188k max.

For the longest time the deductibles have been $5k wind/hail roof (actual cost not replacement cost) along with $1k for all other peril. 

But I decided to go with the mortgage company's minimum requirement of 5% of dwelling cost (or replacement cost -- whatever it's called).   So going with $188k replacement cost, the deductible, across the board is $9400 -- big jump from $1000 for all peril.

But it gets the annual coverage fee down to $801.  This includes $1M in personal liability coverage -- was an extra $15 per year to go from $500k to $1M.. Figured it was worth the extra $15 per year.

So what do you think?  Would you pay $950 more per year for $5000/$1000 deductible coverage vs $9400/$9400 deductible?  Over ten years it's a savings of $9500.

I can't get myself to pay $1750, that's crazy.

My insurance for my Fort Myers, FL rental has gone as follows. House is worth around 375K. Not sure of the replacement cost of the policy at the moment. Hurricane Ian hit in September 2022 and my house didn't have any damage. However, my roof needed to be replaced because it was 19 years old, so I got a new roof in March 2023. The latest policy in 2023 is with a new roof. 

2020: $950/year
2021: $1450/year
2022: $2166/year
2023: $3250/year


Have you shopped around fairly diligently?

nereo

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 18174
  • Location: Just south of Canada
    • Here's how you can support science today:
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2023, 04:50:44 AM »
Paging @Laura33

A few thoughts…
Are you sure the reBuild cost would be $188k max? Construction costs have gone way up in most regions (30-40% in some spots over 2019 levels) , plus building on a virgin lot is cheaper than having to raze, remove and rebuild over an existing, condemned structure.  Rebuild isn’t just the cost of new structure, but includes plans, permitting and site prep (which can be considerable - see below).

A couple years ago we had a pipe burst when we were at work.  Thanks fully a friend saw it within 3 hours, but we had ServPro show up for the remediation, which wound up costing $21k for flooding that “only” impacted a second story bedroom, bathroom and downstairs hallway.   Took $15k and 3 months to repair and rebuild, and often we had to pay too dollar to contractors for jobs I could have done myself because I would not be reimbursed to do repairs myself (insurance required work to be completed by “independent, licensed 3rd party contractors, with multiple quotes prior”). We wound up with $15k in personal belongings damaged from just what was in that bedroom and closet. We stayed with friends for several days but also racked up several thousand in hotel charges (covered) that were covered but went against our max.

On paper it’s easy to look at the total cost to build a similar house and think “yeah, its totally enough”, but that’s under an ideal world where you have a lot that doesn’t have a severely damaged structure in the way and when you presumably can wait for the right contractors and decide what parts of the build you might want to finish yourself, or aspects that you would normally spend more. You lose that when you are rebuilding based on an insurance company’s policy payout.


Oh, and through our whole claim we had to wait several weeks tat every stage to know if a particular expense was going to be paid (or sometimes reimbursed) in full. We knew at the start that it was a relatively minor claim (everyone told us this, from actuators to ServPro) but it was immediately clear how easy it would be for our $174k home to have resulted in $300k in insurance claims had it been a total rebuild job

ChpBstrd

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8321
  • Location: A poor and backward Southern state known as minimum wage country
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2023, 06:53:12 AM »
I suspect the house of the future looks a lot like the prefab metal barns and garages sold on the side of the interstate. No termite risk, no fire risk, earthquake resistant, flood resistant, small, recyclable, and cheap enough to be disposable in the event of wind damage. Sort of like the old Lustron Houses.

Laura33

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3930
  • Location: Mid-Atlantic
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2023, 09:58:45 AM »
Thanks @nereo.

What I have learned from the last 18 months post-literal-fire-(not-"FIRE")-and-gut-job:

Insurance is there to ensure that bad luck doesn't totally fuck you over.  That means different things at different times.  When you're young and just starting out, maybe you don't have enough saved to afford a new roof.  So you pay a fraction of what a new roof would cost to the insurance company, so that they will take care of that for you if you need it/  When you're older and have more saved, you can afford a new roof, so you no longer need to pay a premium for someone else to handle that for you.  OTOH, even when you're older and have a lot saved, a major fire or hurricane or earthquake can still cause way more damage than you can cover -- or, at least, without totally throwing yourself off-track.  So you need insurance to protect you against that kind of major damage/total loss.

What does that mean in the real world?

1.  It means you should get the highest deductible you can afford to cover.  If the insurance company knows they're not on the hook for, say, hail damage to a roof, they will cut you a big price break for that. 

1.a.  And then save a pot of money that is designated to cover that sort of thing.  If you live in a hail-prone area, you should expect hail damage at some point, and someone needs to pay to fix that.  It's fine to take a big deductible, but don't then stick your fingers in your ears and sing "lalalalala" and hope it will never happen to you.  Because if it would never happen to you, the insurance company wouldn't be charging you so much extra money to cover it.  The higher the premium for the extra coverage, the more likely it is that that bad thing will happen.*  So prepare for that.

2.  It means that you do need to make sure that the insurance is adequate to cover that worst-case scenario.  $188K to rebuild??  Do you live in a yurt?  I cannot imagine anywhere that would be that cheap to rebuild now -- at least, not anywhere that involves a foundation, indoor plumbing, and a roof.  Unless maybe it's a condo, and all you're responsible for is stuff from the drywall in, and the condo association covers the building structure and utilities??  Do not cheap out here, on pain of death.  Nereo is right that construction costs have skyrocketed, and a rebuild is always far more expensive than starting from scratch. 

By way of reference, our house was under $600K; our insurance had inflation adjusted to about $850K, and it included coverage for replacement value, so our full coverage was close to $1.2M.  We ended up spending every penny of that to take the house down to the studs and rebuild it from there.  It truly would have been cheaper to raze the whole damn thing.**  And you know what the most amazing part is?  The only fire damage was to one room in the attic, and they only had to take down and rebuild about 1/3 of the roof.  First time I saw it, I thought maybe $100-150K to fix it.  But the smoke and water damage killed everything else -- and anything that wasn't immediately ruined molded over in the c.3 months it took to find out what the insurance payout was going to be so we could actually get started once we knew how much we had to spend.  In the end, getting the highest coverage and all of the riders*** was some of the best money I've ever spent. 

The house fire is one of the hardest things I've dealt with -- not up there with my stepdad's death or the miscarriages, of course, but it is a huge time-suck to deal with, and you have a gazillion decisions to make, right when you're in the middle of dealing with all the emotions that come from losing your stuff and moving and general life upheaval (while, of course, jobs and kids and all those other obligations continue on as if nothing else has happened).  I can't tell you what a relief it was to realize that I had enough insurance to pay to rebuild the house without worrying about if I could afford to do XYZ.  I mean, really:  I do not have words to explain the load that lifted off my shoulders. 


*Remember that insurance companies make their money by accurately predicting what their future losses will be.  So if they charge you a big extra premium for a lower deductible, that means they think it's pretty likely you'll experience damage that costs less than that higher deductible amount.  Home insurance is also different than something like car insurance, because there's not a lot you can do to minimize your risk of those kinds of losses; whereas you can change your driving habits to at least minimize your risk of a car crash, most of the bad stuff that happens to your house is completely out of your control.  That means you can arbitrage the car insurance -- take a higher deductible, then manage your own driving to minimize the risk you need to actually pay that deductibe -- but not so much for the home insurance.  Ergo, it's pretty reasonable to assume that at some point, you'll need to pay whatever home insurance deductible you sign up for. 

**It's a historic house, and we wanted to preserve as much character as we could.  If we had less insurance, we would have had to tear it down and rebuild with a modern house without that character -- but we bought this house because of all that character, so if we had lost that, I would have been incredibly sad and regretted it the rest of my life (and probably have spent even more of my own money over the next decade to try to add some of that back in). 

***House was 120+ years old when we bought it, so we knew from the start that any damage was going to cost more than usual to fix.  We just never expected to actually have it happen.

Paper Chaser

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2200
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2023, 04:28:58 AM »
The rebuild cost is only around $188k max.

I think you're probably way underestimating the current rebuild cost here. Many materials are still much higher than they were pre-pandemic, and labor is way up across the board.

There's nothing wrong with choosing to have less insurance if you can afford to handle anything that comes up, but you should make sure that you're well informed about whether you can actually afford to handle anything that comes up. I'd look around in your area to see what new homes are selling for. If there's nothing comparable, you can break it down by price/sqft to get an average cost. Or if there aren't any comparable new homes you could email some custom builders to try to get a ballpark for an equivalent new build.

dot

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2023, 04:20:56 PM »
I had a similar shock this year, when our bill went up 65% (from $1400 to $2300). We're several hundred miles inland, in a hail-prone place that doesn't catch fire very often. The $2300 is the best the independent agent could find, because our roof, installed in 2017, is "too old."
 
I would really recommend getting a quote for the higher rebuild cost--it's probably pretty negligible to get a more realistic coverage. I noticed that our coverage looked low (only 10% higher than last year), so I had them bump that up another 20-ish percent, braced for another big price increase, and the premium only went up $30.

jnw

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2063
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2023, 06:49:31 AM »
Most insurance companies have $172-177K for rebuild cost.  The insurance company I went with, there minimum was $188k.  $188k is what I went with.  The home value is valued much less than $188k.. Probably worth around $140k at most.

I don't know why home rebuild cost is higher now.. the 2x4 studs which were like $8 per board are now back under $3.00 recently.

nereo

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 18174
  • Location: Just south of Canada
    • Here's how you can support science today:
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2023, 07:44:19 AM »
Most insurance companies have $172-177K for rebuild cost.  The insurance company I went with, their minimum was $188k.  $188k is what I went with.  The home value is valued much less than $188k.. Probably worth around $140k at most.

Yeah, if your house is worth $140k right now there’s virtually no way you could do a complete rebuild for $188k following a total claim. New construction is considerably more than existing (cost per square feet) and rebuilding is much more than new construction. Remember your existing structure has depreciation already factored in.

Quote
I don't know why home rebuild cost is higher now.. the 2x4 studs which were like $8 per board are now back under $3.00 recently.

Labor, plus all the manufactured components. The material cost of studs, plywood and drywall is just a few thousand dollars for your average SFH. Labor on average accounts for >50% of total costs, and items like the HVAC system, windows, cabinets and appliances make up the majority of material costs.

jnw

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2063
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2023, 08:31:10 AM »
I have no experience and no clue what would happen if my home burnt down.  I'd be happy to get the $140k it's worth but something is telling me the insurance companies have it all figured out so I don't get a reasonable amount of money.

Why would they put the rebuild cost below what it'd cost to actually rebuild it? >< 

So what would happen if it did burn down?  Would I either pay $250k to rebuild it or take $90k for it if I don't rebuild it?  I have no idea what they'd do.  I just want the right amount of money for what the home is worth.

I'd like my $140k if it burned down and move.  Or if that isn't really an option, at least I want enough coverage to realistically rebuild it.  Why are they so deceptive?

I read the rebuild cost of home is $100 to $150 per square foot.  This home is small, under 1100 square feet.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2023, 08:41:00 AM by jnw »

nereo

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 18174
  • Location: Just south of Canada
    • Here's how you can support science today:
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2023, 09:33:50 AM »
I have no experience and no clue what would happen if my home burnt down.  I'd be happy to get the $140k it's worth but something is telling me the insurance companies have it all figured out so I don't get a reasonable amount of money.

Why would they put the rebuild cost below what it'd cost to actually rebuild it? >< 


Because they are in the business of making money, and capping their payouts limits their liability.

Quote
So what would happen if it did burn down?  Would I either pay $250k to rebuild it or take $90k for it if I don't rebuild it?  I have no idea what they'd do.  I just want the right amount of money for what the home is worth.
Read the policy, carefully.  There is generally an a amount for remediation and an amount for rebuilding, plus personal property.  On top of all of that there is often a max (or lifetime) payout, which may be considerably less than Remediation + Rebuild + Personal Property.  If your house catches on fire and the embers then ignite your neighbors home, you are on the hook for that as well and it counts against your max.

Also consider what you would want to do if your home was condemned and you were offered a payout. The most economical thing might be to move, but will you want to? If its a hot housing market or if the claim is from a natural disaster that destroyed dozens of homes in your area you may be competing with others to stay in your neighborhood.  This may or may not matter to you.

Quote
I'd like my $140k if it burned down and move.  Or if that isn't really an option, at least I want enough coverage to realistically rebuild it.  Why are they so deceptive?

I don’t think its deceptive so much as people simply don’t bother to understand what their policies actually cover and what it would realistically cost to rebuild. What your house is worth is NOT the same as what it would take to rebuild, in no small part because everything in a rebuild is new, whereas your home has a variety of components which are of varying ages (roof, HVAC, floors, etc).  When they do home appraisals one of the big factors is the overall condition.


Insurance companies are happy to sell you more coverage with correspondingly higher premiums. In the end it comes down to what your risk tolerance is and whether you’d be able to weather a major disaster.


Quote
I read the rebuild cost of home is $100 to $150 per square foot.  This home is small, under 1100 square feet.

I do not know where you go these figures, but I can tall you they are absolutely wrong in 2023. Remember, rebuilding cost > new construction > existing appraisal. On-spec new construction is going for $150-200sqft, but a rebuild isn’t that, and will cost more.
If you are living in a sub 1,100 square foot home with an appraisal of $140k that’s over $130/sqft for an existing structure.

Remember, if you chose to rebuild you aren’t rebuilding on a virgin lot, but instead dealing with the ruined structure first. Demoing an entire home can cost $15k-25k, and more if your home was built with vermiculite, asbestos tiles, formaldehyde-treated lumber or lead paint (very common pre 1980s).  Regardless of what how your previous home was constructed, you will be required to comply with the updated codes, which were not factored into the value of your existing home.  Things like egress-certified windows, arc-fault breakers and exterior insulation add considerable cost. Local codes apply as well and can be filled with nasty surprises, like setbacks or prohibitions from building at all.   Check your local codes to see what things would need to be changed if your home were built today (or ask a building inspector, which is a good strategy regardless as they can highlight vulnerabilities and deferred maintenence that can save you thousands in the long run).




Laura33

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3930
  • Location: Mid-Atlantic
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #15 on: August 25, 2023, 09:38:19 AM »
Why would they put the rebuild cost below what it'd cost to actually rebuild it? >< 

So what would happen if it did burn down?  Would I either pay $250k to rebuild it or take $90k for it if I don't rebuild it?  I have no idea what they'd do.  I just want the right amount of money for what the home is worth.

People will always be happy to insure you for less than full value.  You get what you pay for, right?  So if you want a lower cap, you'll pay less, and vice-versa.

Assuming you have replacement cost coverage, here is how it works: 

1.  They give you a check for the depreciated cost of the house.  This is probably around 60% of the value of the policy.  You can use this check to rebuild or pocket it and walk away.

2.  Once you prove to them that you actually did rebuild (and not just tear it down and sell the lot), they pay you the full rebuild cost, up to the max you are insured for.  Most big insurers are willing to give you the full rebuild cost once you give them a signed contract to rebuild -- they just don't want to pay rebuild costs for a rebuild that doesn't happen. 

Sibley

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8031
  • Location: Northwest Indiana
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #16 on: August 25, 2023, 12:25:31 PM »
What amount you can sell the house for, what amount you get taxed on, what it would cost to rebuild new, and what its worth to you are all different numbers that have limited relationships to each other.

You're mixing them up, and once you can get the different valuations sorted out in your head will help you.

FTR, yeah, you're massively underestimating rebuild costs. It's your risk to take though, so I hope you have plenty of money in the bank if you need it.

ChpBstrd

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8321
  • Location: A poor and backward Southern state known as minimum wage country
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #17 on: August 25, 2023, 01:13:48 PM »
In my area, older homes sell for much less than new construction. Thus, if my old house burned down and was replaced with new construction, I would be extracting more from the insurance company than I lost. On the flipside, I am paying for the replacement cost of new construction when all I have at risk is a depreciated older structure.

Realistically, if my house burned to the ground and I was immediately cut a check from insurance, I would put the lot up for sale and shop for another older home. If the reconstruction portion of the check was $250k, I could buy another old home for $200k, sell my old lot for $25k, and keep the $75k difference.

Had I lost a new home, I would have simply lost $250k worth of value and been paid $250k. So the insurance incentives favor buying older homes at a discount.

nereo

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 18174
  • Location: Just south of Canada
    • Here's how you can support science today:
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2023, 03:23:34 PM »
In my area, older homes sell for much less than new construction. Thus, if my old house burned down and was replaced with new construction, I would be extracting more from the insurance company than I lost. On the flipside, I am paying for the replacement cost of new construction when all I have at risk is a depreciated older structure.

Realistically, if my house burned to the ground and I was immediately cut a check from insurance, I would put the lot up for sale and shop for another older home. If the reconstruction portion of the check was $250k, I could buy another old home for $200k, sell my old lot for $25k, and keep the $75k difference.

Had I lost a new home, I would have simply lost $250k worth of value and been paid $250k. So the insurance incentives favor buying older homes at a discount.

Except the appraised value of the older home will not be nearly as high as the new construction, and the corresponding insurance coverage will be less (both in coverage and in premiums). 

ChpBstrd

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8321
  • Location: A poor and backward Southern state known as minimum wage country
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #19 on: August 25, 2023, 03:48:46 PM »
In my area, older homes sell for much less than new construction. Thus, if my old house burned down and was replaced with new construction, I would be extracting more from the insurance company than I lost. On the flipside, I am paying for the replacement cost of new construction when all I have at risk is a depreciated older structure.

Realistically, if my house burned to the ground and I was immediately cut a check from insurance, I would put the lot up for sale and shop for another older home. If the reconstruction portion of the check was $250k, I could buy another old home for $200k, sell my old lot for $25k, and keep the $75k difference.

Had I lost a new home, I would have simply lost $250k worth of value and been paid $250k. So the insurance incentives favor buying older homes at a discount.
Except the appraised value of the older home will not be nearly as high as the new construction, and the corresponding insurance coverage will be less (both in coverage and in premiums).
Nope, I've had this argument with many different insurance agents for 20 years now (hmm, maybe I'm stubborn?). They all insist that they are only allowed to write policies for full reconstruction value rather than the price I could pay for the house across the street. It's about a 20-30% difference in my neighborhood and a 100%+ difference in poor neighborhoods.

jnw

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2063
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #20 on: August 29, 2023, 10:01:58 AM »
Thanks for all the help everyone.  I contacted my homeowner's insurance agent today and asked about a higher reconstruction cost policy.  Currently the reconstruction limit is at $188k; I asked about $225k or $250k instead.  [Policy is $816 per year currently for the $188k coverage.]

She replied:

"I can add extended replacement cost to your policy meaning an additional 25% off the dwelling. Should 188k not enough to rebuilt at the time of a total loss then the extended replacement cost will pick up up to 25%.  This will add 36 dollars annually making your new premium $852."

1.25 x $188k = $235k. 

Is this good?   I guess the wind/hail & all peril deductibles would still be 5% of the $188k = $9400/$9400.  I'll ask her.
« Last Edit: August 29, 2023, 10:09:29 AM by jnw »

Laura33

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3930
  • Location: Mid-Atlantic
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #21 on: August 29, 2023, 10:13:38 AM »
Thanks for all the help everyone.  I contacted my homeowner's insurance agent today and asked about a higher reconstruction cost policy.  Currently the reconstruction limit is at $188k; I asked about $225k or $250k instead.  [Policy is $816 per year currently for the $188k coverage.]

She replied:

"I can add extended replacement cost to your policy meaning an additional 25% off the dwelling. Should 188k not enough to rebuilt at the time of a total loss then the extended replacement cost will pick up up to 25%.  This will add 36 dollars annually making your new premium $852."

1.25 x $188k = $235k. 

Is this good?   I guess the wind/hail & all peril deductibles would still be 5% of the $188k = $9400/$9400.  I'll ask her.

You're paying c.4% more annually for 25% more coverage.  Personally, I'd take it, since it strikes me as very likely you'd exceed $188K if you had a catastrophe of some variety. 

jnw

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2063
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #22 on: August 29, 2023, 10:23:03 AM »
You're paying c.4% more annually for 25% more coverage.  Personally, I'd take it, since it strikes me as very likely you'd exceed $188K if you had a catastrophe of some variety.

Thanks, I just don't understand the 25% extended coverage vs. just raising the reconstruction cost.  Don't know what the implications are.  Why didn't she just increase the reconstruction cost?

ChpBstrd

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8321
  • Location: A poor and backward Southern state known as minimum wage country
Re: Homeowner's Insurance Rate Skyrocketed lol. What I went with today.
« Reply #23 on: August 29, 2023, 02:40:11 PM »
You're paying c.4% more annually for 25% more coverage.  Personally, I'd take it, since it strikes me as very likely you'd exceed $188K if you had a catastrophe of some variety.
Thanks, I just don't understand the 25% extended coverage vs. just raising the reconstruction cost.  Don't know what the implications are.  Why didn't she just increase the reconstruction cost?
The extra coverage does not mean they will rebuild more than exactly what was lost. It only protects you if exactly what you lost exceeds the value the insurance company thinks it would cost to rebuild. I would presume the insurance company knows exactly what they'll spend if your house burns to the ground tomorrow, and they're willing to offer this increased amount because they know it is highly unlikely they'll spend that much. A sudden midyear bump in inflation or some sort of failure by the insurance agent are what you're insuring against.