Owning is NOT fundamentally superior to renting. There are major trade offs for both.
Owning gives you a few advantages, but comes with enormous drawbacks. It's up to you if the trade offs are beneficial or not to you.
I own a few properties almost exclusively for the financial benefits. Owning is a pain in the ass, IMO, but that's because I don't get a lot from the benefits of owning.
I *like* to move semi-regularly, I am not obsessed with customizing my home finishes I don't really care what my countertops are made of, I despise gardening and lawn maintenance, so none of that matters to me, and I have zero "price of ownership" and never even wanted to be a homeowner.
What I do have are A LOT of bills for repairs. Which is fine because I'm coming out so far ahead with owning over renting in my locations that it's just the cost of doing business.
But if I wasn't coming out substantially far ahead financially as an owner, this shit would 1000% NOT be worth it for the other benefits.
Moving is nowhere near as much of a hassle as putting up with 3 summers of jackhammering, or finding extensive rot under the house to the point that the mud room almost collapsed, or losing my parking spot for over a year because of garage repairs.
That said, I own multiple homes, so I just kind of fuck off to the other one when there's something I don't like at the first. In fact, the jackhammering and major repairs on my apartment building are a big part of *why* I have a second home.
I've been able to live in the rural home during the summer when the apartment is inhospitable and live in the apartment during the winter when there's no construction while the rural home has its repairs done.
If I was stuck in either spot, unable to just pick up and move, I would be miserable.
Now, it's unusual to buy an apartment in a highrise and then have that building need 3-8 years of extensive repairs, it happens once every 50 years because that's the lifespan of concrete and my building recently turned 50. But I'm making the point that sometimes owning saddles you with much bigger hassles than just having to move.
Last time I was renting the building next to us was being demolished and replaced, it was HORRIBLE, so I just moved. Before that, the street I was living on got torn up for major rehab projected to last 2+ years, so I just moved. Before that, I was renting a duplex with thin walks and neighbours moved in who were unbearably loud, so I just moved, and at another time I was the neighbour who was too loud, my dog had been attacked and developed anxiety and started barking too much, so I just moved.
Now, because I have multiple properties, I *can* just move, but I'm extremely limited by locations, unless I choose to rent them out and go back to renting myself, which I'm very open to. All of my properties are good rentals. I personally would never own anything I couldn't easily rent out for a profit, because I despise having my housing options so limited.
So yes, owning gives you the advantage that you can't be forced to move. But how much is that *actually* worth to you compared to not being able to move??