No such thing as a SWR exists however much people want to think it does.
Hrm, you sound suspiciously similar to another poster who routinely made this same false argument and who seems to have mysteriously disappeared from the forum around the same time you registered...
As has been repeatedly pointed out in various threads across the forum, the concept of a "safe withdrawal rate", as ordinarily defined in the financial planning literature and as used in this forum, is backward (not forward) looking, and, by definition, irrefutably exists -- there can be no argument that, say, 4% constituted a "safe withdrawal rate" for a 30-year retirement period for a certain asset allocation and a certain threshold setting for the percentage of historical cases in which the portfolio was not depleted to zero. The same can be said of a 10% withdrawal rate, if you set your bar for "safe" low enough.
Try finding 10 people who can tell you they have followed a SWR plan for 20 years.
And, as has also been pointed out time and time again, exactly nobody actually algorithmically follows a precise SWR spending plan in retirement, and no one ever suggests that anyone should. The purpose of the SWR concept is to serve as a guideline for a more comprehensive (and hopefully a flexible and adaptive) retirement plan. When the OP asked for people's actual or planned SWRs, I believe that was shorthand for indirectly asking "what size portfolio did you retire on or plan to retire on, expressed as a multiple of your projected annual expenditures?", and
not "what inflation-adjusted withdrawal rate do you plan to robotically adhere to without deviation for the entirety of your retirement period?"