Author Topic: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?  (Read 6462 times)

helloyou

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 288
If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« on: January 13, 2021, 12:37:47 AM »
Hello,

As I'm contemplating going on fire (although still looking for job due to being in lockdown), I was wondering how are you FIRED guys prepared for potential downturn.

If the stock market crash 50-70%, would you still be fire?

In my case, due to being a low spender, a 50% crash would get my portfolio to shrink to the £300-350k mark, and due to my very low spending in nature, I'd still be lean FIRE and could stick to the 4% rule and spend around £1400/month for living and stay as-is.

But if it crashes by 70% I'd have no choice then to start looking for work to replenish my cash and prevent to suck cash from my portfolio at the lowest point... Maybe will go back living with my parents for the time being if no job can be found at that time?
This won't be pretty, but definitely not the end of the world!


What about you? What's your thoughts and preparation about that?


cool7hand

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 525
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2021, 05:37:33 AM »
My wife and I use a low volatility portfolio now that we are FIREd (I'm FIRE, she's coastFIRE until June when she joins me). Our goal is to continue to grow our wealth consistent with the 4% rule, but sacrifice additional growth for stability.

Google: Ray Dalio's All Seasons (aka All Weather) Portfolio. In exchange for more modest growth, it protects against wild swings in downturns. In 2020 during the Covid selloff, we initially hit an all-time high as people rushed into the gold and bonds we already held in this portfolio. When the market hit its low in 2020, some sites say that the market was down as much as 34% at this time, we were down only 12%. If we used this ratio with 50% (and I admit that such a ratio is not what would really happen), we'd still be FIREd. At 70%, we're cutting it close, but we'd still be much better off than others who are in solely equities.

The trade off of lower growth for less volatility isn't for everyone, but it fits our situation and goals.

Illgetthere

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2021, 06:59:35 AM »
I wouldn't be at 70%. At 50%, I could be with adjusted spending. However, I'm just FI and not FIRE right now. Once the RE part happens, I intend to keep a couple years expenses in cash and pull from it in a down-market rather than selling investments. The value of the stock doesn't matter until you sell, and I'd expect it to rebound at least a reasonable amount before the couple years were up. I also don't imagine I'll see a 70% downturn

NotJen

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1028
  • Location: USA
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2021, 07:45:52 AM »
Depends on how long the "crash" lasts.

With the market downturn in March, I was no longer at my FIRE number (I had just FIRED 3 months earlier), but by the end of the year after the recovery I was 24% over my FIRE number.  It had no impact at all on my FIRE plans.

My FIRE number is just an idea, lots of things could make me reduce spending or increase income.  I'd still consider myself FIRED from my career, even though I might take on paid work from time to time.

helloyou

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 288
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2021, 07:55:31 AM »
I wouldn't be at 70%. At 50%, I could be with adjusted spending. However, I'm just FI and not FIRE right now. Once the RE part happens, I intend to keep a couple years expenses in cash and pull from it in a down-market rather than selling investments. The value of the stock doesn't matter until you sell, and I'd expect it to rebound at least a reasonable amount before the couple years were up. I also don't imagine I'll see a 70% downturn

For now we're in deflation mode, but if ever inflation pick up, we may end up like the 1970 where the FED was forced to increase interest rate significantly and tank the entire market.

I hope as well it won't happen, but who knows!

2Birds1Stone

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6358
  • Age: 1
  • Location: Earth
  • K Thnx Bye
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2021, 08:25:36 AM »
Yes.

Greystache

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 409
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2021, 08:26:05 AM »
I'm only 50% invested in equities, so it would sting, but it would not send me back to work.  I also have other streams of income available in addition to my investment portfolio.  Frankly, a 50% crash is what I have included in my planning.

Bird In Hand

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 760
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2021, 08:29:06 AM »
We're nominally FI but not RE - OMY!  A 50% drop would take RE off the table for sure, probably for a few years depending on the trajectory of the recovery.

v8rx7guy

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2158
  • Age: 36
  • Location: Bellingham, WA
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2021, 08:39:34 AM »
I'm confused.  Once you are financially independent, it should not matter if the market crashes or not.  At least historically speaking, if you unplug your income once you have 25X annual spending saved and invested in the markets, history says you have a high 90's percent chance of not running out of money for 30 years and often beyond.  This includes periods of times with really hard crashes approaching 50%.  Of course I am referring to 2008 and history has yet to be written if someone who unplugged right before that crash will still have funds after 30 years, but it does sure look good.  There are even members here who RE'd right around that time and they are doing just fine.  Maybe I am misunderstanding your question?

Chuck Ditallin

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 65
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2021, 08:43:08 AM »
Is this not the same question as "Do you currently have a 2% withdrawal rate?", with a few caveats..?

Personally, no, we don't currently have a 2% withdrawal rate, but we will collect a very good pension in 5 years and another, smaller, one in 7. We also hold enough cash to cover us for 3-4 years from now; some of that money is due to be spent elsewhere, but we can't spend it as intended while under lockdown, so it will be a de facto addition to our emergency fund until we can spend it elsewhere.

We could live off the first pension alone, with some excess-trimming from our expenses.

We therefore currently have 1 year to worry about, which we could fund even if markets went down 50%.

The question also pre-supposes that markets went down 50% and stayed down. The overwhelming likelihood, based on past data, is that the markets will go down and then recover in a couple of years. Even the awful stagflation decade, two World Wars, etc have seen the markets recover to where they are today.

Coping with a temporary 50% decline for a couple of years is easy to plan for, even with a current 4% WR. Coping with the complete and permanent death of equities would be much harder, but is much less likely. I'd not explicitly plan for the latter, but I'm confident we would cope if necessary.

2Birds1Stone

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6358
  • Age: 1
  • Location: Earth
  • K Thnx Bye
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2021, 08:46:53 AM »
Is this not the same question as "Do you currently have a 2% withdrawal rate?", with a few caveats..?

This would only apply if you were 100% equities.

Jack0Life

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 409
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #11 on: January 13, 2021, 08:54:34 AM »
I know this is just a what IF scenario but it doesn't seem plausible.
Looking at historical numbers, the worst run was 73&74 when the market dropped 17% and 29%. Also in 2000&01&02 when it dropped 10% 13% and 23%, Even through those times it wasn't 50%.
While 50% could happened, 70% is far fetched.

2Birds1Stone

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6358
  • Age: 1
  • Location: Earth
  • K Thnx Bye
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #12 on: January 13, 2021, 08:57:26 AM »
I know this is just a what IF scenario but it doesn't seem plausible.
Looking at historical numbers, the worst run was 73&74 when the market dropped 17% and 29%. Also in 2000&01&02 when it dropped 10% 13% and 23%, Even through those times it wasn't 50%.
While 50% could happened, 70% is far fetched.


helloyou

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 288
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #13 on: January 13, 2021, 09:15:58 AM »



Looks like I should use 50-86% lol

Impossible to live on 86% drop lol. A $1M portfolio would just worth $140k!!!

Chuck Ditallin

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 65
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #14 on: January 13, 2021, 09:17:30 AM »
Is this not the same question as "Do you currently have a 2% withdrawal rate?", with a few caveats..?

This would only apply if you were 100% equities.

That would be one of the caveats.

To take it to its logical conclusion, if all your investments were currency under the mattress, your net worth would be unchanged if the markets plunged (with a few caveats.)

CoffeeR

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 229
  • Location: Southwest
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #15 on: January 13, 2021, 09:40:19 AM »
Google: Ray Dalio's All Seasons (aka All Weather) Portfolio. In exchange for more modest growth, it protects against wild swings in downturns.
How do you invest in commodities? Not counting precious metal's ETF's, most commodity ETF/Funds actually track the futures market and have their own unique set of problems.

SwordGuy

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7913
  • Location: Fayetteville, NC
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #16 on: January 13, 2021, 10:52:15 AM »
Yes, because our passive income sources that provide our FI income do not rely on the stock market.  Our market portfolio is for long term growth, not for day-to-day expenses.

spartana

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2192
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #17 on: January 13, 2021, 02:41:59 PM »
Yes. I lost 50% of my NW shortly after I FIREd during the Great Recession and did fine. Had some cash (CDs and bonds) I could live off so didn't have to touch the stash and could live on a small amount.  I also could have taken in roommates, sold my paid off house and rented, or gone back to work even PT or seasonal/temp and cover my low expenses. I didn't have to do any of those things. So other than some belt tightening on discretionary things,  nothing really changed for me. If it was a permanent situation I'd still be FIRE but just have to live leaner then I'd like.

GuitarStv

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 17835
  • Age: 39
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #18 on: January 13, 2021, 02:45:57 PM »
That's why you keep bonds.  When your stocks have tanked, you take your money out of bonds for a few years until the market recovers.

helloyou

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 288
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #19 on: January 13, 2021, 03:18:41 PM »
Yes. I lost 50% of my NW shortly after I FIREd during the Great Recession and did fine. Had some cash (CDs and bonds) I could live off so didn't have to touch the stash and could live on a small amount.  I also could have taken in roommates, sold my paid off house and rented, or gone back to work even PT or seasonal/temp and cover my low expenses. I didn't have to do any of those things. So other than some belt tightening on discretionary things,  nothing really changed for me. If it was a permanent situation I'd still be FIRE but just have to live leaner then I'd like.

Do you mean the 2008 crisis?

helloyou

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 288
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #20 on: January 13, 2021, 03:21:28 PM »
That's why you keep bonds.  When your stocks have tanked, you take your money out of bonds for a few years until the market recovers.

Which bonds? If you get corporate bonds they'll tank as well as we've seen during march crash. And if company becomes insolvent they won't pay interest anyway. So your bonds are not worth anything if the pay are cut.

The only bonds which are guaranteed to pay are the treasury bonds.. but then we're close to 0% interest.

I can't see bond very helpful if we see a 50-70% crash tbh..

spartana

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2192
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #21 on: January 13, 2021, 03:34:49 PM »
Yes. I lost 50% of my NW shortly after I FIREd during the Great Recession and did fine. Had some cash (CDs and bonds) I could live off so didn't have to touch the stash and could live on a small amount.  I also could have taken in roommates, sold my paid off house and rented, or gone back to work even PT or seasonal/temp and cover my low expenses. I didn't have to do any of those things. So other than some belt tightening on discretionary things,  nothing really changed for me. If it was a permanent situation I'd still be FIRE but just have to live leaner then I'd like.

Do you mean the 2008 crisis?
Yes. I had no debt and a paid off house. Investments and home value tanked by about 50% each but because I didn't have big expenses, it wasn't hard to live on cash for a few years.  I cut my discretionary spending (travel etc) and pursued low cost or free hobbies I actually was able to live on quit a bit less then I had thought I needed and my "cash" lasted a long long time. I also had a small future pension I could get at age 50 and planned to sell my house and downsize so knew I would have that later in life.

Others have real estate or other early retirement things so not as dependent on the stash 100%. Most people who are do put several years expenses in "cash" to cover a downturn. The lean FIRE crowd though could be in trouble if they have no expenses to cut further and no cushion to tied them over. And while most can find work again if needed, many in the 2008 recession who lost their jobs couldn't even find a minimum wage job flipping burgers let alone in their own field. Obviously your age plays a role in that. If you are in your 30s or early 40s then  you can likely bounce back. If you are 50s and beyond it might be harder.

ETA: I currently keep $30k in a low interest money market account. That would cover about 3 years worth of my "base" expenses without having to touch anything else. However I now get a small government pension since I turned 50 and that covers all my low "base"  expenses. I haven't really touched investments yet but did start tapping them to travel more this year - DOH!.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2021, 03:44:31 PM by spartana »

helloyou

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 288
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #22 on: January 13, 2021, 03:47:05 PM »
Yes. I had no debt and a paid off house. Investments and home value tanked by about 50% each but because I didn't have big expenses, it wasn't hard to live on cash for a few years.  I cut my discretionary spending (travel etc) and pursued low cost or free hobbies I actually was able to live on quit a bit less then I had thought I needed and my "cash" lasted a long long time. I also had a small future pension I could get at age 50 and planned to sell my house and downsize so knew I would have that later in life.

Others have real estate or other early retirement things so not as dependent on the stash 100%. Most people who are do put several years expenses in "cash" to cover a downturn. The lean FIRE crowd though could be in trouble if they have no expenses to cut further and no cushion to tied them over. And while most can find work again if needed, many in the 2008 recession who lost their jobs couldn't even find a minimum wage job flipping burgers let alone in their own field. Obviously your age plays a role in that. If you are in your 30s or early 40s then  you can likely bounce back. If you are 50s and beyond it might be harder.

ETA: I currently keep $30k in a low interest money market account. That would cover about 3 years worth of my "base" expenses without having to touch anything else. However I now get a small government pension since I turned 50 and that covers all my low "base"  expenses. I haven't really touched investments yet but did start tapping them to travel more this year - DOH!.

Aww that sounds good. I keep being confused by your quote "fired at 36? 42?" I thought you were my age so wasn't sure if you retired 12 years ago

American GenX

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 717
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #23 on: January 13, 2021, 03:47:18 PM »
Yes, and do some rebalancing.

spartana

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2192
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #24 on: January 13, 2021, 03:52:23 PM »
Yes. I had no debt and a paid off house. Investments and home value tanked by about 50% each but because I didn't have big expenses, it wasn't hard to live on cash for a few years.  I cut my discretionary spending (travel etc) and pursued low cost or free hobbies I actually was able to live on quit a bit less then I had thought I needed and my "cash" lasted a long long time. I also had a small future pension I could get at age 50 and planned to sell my house and downsize so knew I would have that later in life.

Others have real estate or other early retirement things so not as dependent on the stash 100%. Most people who are do put several years expenses in "cash" to cover a downturn. The lean FIRE crowd though could be in trouble if they have no expenses to cut further and no cushion to tied them over. And while most can find work again if needed, many in the 2008 recession who lost their jobs couldn't even find a minimum wage job flipping burgers let alone in their own field. Obviously your age plays a role in that. If you are in your 30s or early 40s then  you can likely bounce back. If you are 50s and beyond it might be harder.

ETA: I currently keep $30k in a low interest money market account. That would cover about 3 years worth of my "base" expenses without having to touch anything else. However I now get a small government pension since I turned 50 and that covers all my low "base"  expenses. I haven't really touched investments yet but did start tapping them to travel more this year - DOH!.

Aww that sounds good. I keep being confused by your quote "fired at 36? 42?" I thought you were my age so wasn't sure if you retired 12 years ago
Yeah I can see that as confusing. Guess I should change it to "FIREd a million years ago!" I actually Fired at 36, took two years off to travel, then went back to my old job for 4 years (bought a house and paid it off then), then quit again at 42 and haven't worked since. Now I'm a 50-something retiree who hasn't worked in years so it does seem like I've been FIREd a million years ;-)!
« Last Edit: January 13, 2021, 10:14:30 PM by spartana »

helloyou

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 288
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #25 on: January 13, 2021, 04:11:16 PM »
Yeah I can see that as confusing. Guess I should change it to "FIREd a million years ago!" I actually Fired at 36, took two years off to travel, then went back to my old job for 4 years (bought a house and paid it off then), then quit again at 42 and haven't worked since. Now I'm a 50-something retiree who hasn't worked in like 20 years so it does seem like I've been FIREd a million years ;-)!

Ahhh I see. Makes sense now.

I was about to travel and try FIRING if there wasn't lockdown everywhere. So back to looking for work for now.

MoseyingAlong

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 239
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #26 on: January 13, 2021, 04:59:38 PM »
That's why you keep bonds.  When your stocks have tanked, you take your money out of bonds for a few years until the market recovers.

Which bonds? If you get corporate bonds they'll tank as well as we've seen during march crash. And if company becomes insolvent they won't pay interest anyway. So your bonds are not worth anything if the pay are cut.

The only bonds which are guaranteed to pay are the treasury bonds.. but then we're close to 0% interest.

I can't see bond very helpful if we see a 50-70% crash tbh..

In my view, the main point of having bonds is safety, not return. It sucks right now that interest rates are so low but if you buy short-term individual CDs and/or Treasury bonds, they are still about the safest option.

I have/recommend a CD/bond ladder, about 5 years, maybe a little less. If the stock market crashes, use the CD/bond ladder for your living expenses while giving the market time to recover. Yes, the low returns on the ladder might be a drag on your overall portfolio but, if they make a material difference, you were on the edge anyway.

BTW I recommend individual CDs and Treasury bonds. You don't want to be all in bond funds and have your fellow fund holders cash out causing the managers to have to see at a loss. You want the safety of knowing you will get 100% of your CD/bonds when you need them (assuming FDIC and Treasury haven't failed. In which case we probably have bigger problems.). If you want to goose the returns a little, maybe get a corporate or muni bond for 20% of a rung, but not the whole thing.

This isn't difficult to implement. Once a year when the CD/bond matures, decide if you need it for spending or roll it over to the end of the ladder. Done for another year.

lutorm

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 345
  • Location: A large island in the middle of the Pacific Ocean
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #27 on: January 13, 2021, 05:48:52 PM »
I'm confused.  Once you are financially independent, it should not matter if the market crashes or not.  At least historically speaking, if you unplug your income once you have 25X annual spending saved and invested in the markets, history says you have a high 90's percent chance of not running out of money for 30 years and often beyond.  This includes periods of times with really hard crashes approaching 50%.  Of course I am referring to 2008 and history has yet to be written if someone who unplugged right before that crash will still have funds after 30 years, but it does sure look good.  There are even members here who RE'd right around that time and they are doing just fine.  Maybe I am misunderstanding your question?
I was going to say the same thing. As I understand the 4% "rule", it concludes that you'd be largely safe keeping a 70-30 asset allocation and not changing your spending for any market behavior that's comprised by the existing stock market history. A severe market crash is already factored into the conditions, because there have been such crashes in the past. This is why 4% is considered the "safe" withdrawal rate. (There are details, of course...)

If you're FIRE according to to the 4% "rule", you don't suddenly become un-FIREd if the market goes down such that your annual expenses are now >4%. It would certainly be unnerving, but even the majority of those scenarios have come out OK historically.

ysette9

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7473
  • Location: Bay Area, CA
    • The Best Is Yet To Come
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #28 on: January 13, 2021, 08:47:51 PM »
We are employing the reverse equity glide path, also known as the bond tent approach. So once we reached out FI number we were 60/40 stock/bond. The idea is we will spend down our bonds in the first ten years or so of retirement and slowly move back to a very equity-heavy allocation once our portfolio is too big to fail. So if the stock market plunged 50% we should be fine with a combo of living off the bonds and rebalancing to buy stocks when they are low. Given last history I wouldn’t expect such a dump to last more than a few years, and we would be fine in that time.

We also spend a lot and so have a lot more wiggle room than others. And with my husband OMYing and how well the market has done recently we are at 135% of our FI number.... it would suck to look at our spreadsheet but I am sure we would be a-okay.

chevy1956

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 165
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #29 on: January 13, 2021, 09:38:38 PM »
I've just fired and I have enough in cash for the next couple of years. I expect the market to crash 50% more than once when I retire. I also expect the market to crash that much when I'm 100% stocks as I intend to slowly get to 100% stocks.

It's all part of the plan. I hope the plan works and I'm not going to fret about what I expect to happen.

Dicey

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 15250
  • Age: 63
  • Location: NorCal
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #30 on: January 13, 2021, 09:53:42 PM »
Yup. This is not something I lose sleep over.

Omy

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 765
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #31 on: January 13, 2021, 10:09:04 PM »
We would be fine.

30% of our total net worth is in real estate. Our residence and rentals are mortgage free. And the rentals bring in enough to cover our basic expenses.

20% of our net worth is cash/bonds/annuity. It's a big safety net, but we want the flexibility to purchase more real estate if the right opportunity presents itself. And it keeps us from having to sell when the market is down.

50% of our net worth is in the stock market. So a 50% downturn is "only" a 25% drop in net worth. Not a big deal since we can survive with a 1-2% withdrawal rate.

We are both within a decade of being able to draw social security, and we both have other income sources we can turn back on if necessary. We just stick with the plan and never look at our balances on bad market days.

spartana

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2192
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #32 on: January 13, 2021, 10:22:31 PM »
I've just fired and I have enough in cash for the next couple of years. I expect the market to crash 50% more than once when I retire. I also expect the market to crash that much when I'm 100% stocks as I intend to slowly get to 100% stocks.

It's all part of the plan. I hope the plan works and I'm not going to fret about what I expect to happen.
That's a good point. The younger you FIRE, the more likely you are to see 2 or more big drops during your life time. Besides all the little once since 2008, a big one is likely and maybe soon. That will be 2 big uns in my FIRE life so far and likely more when I'm older.  But I am in a better financial position now then I was then.  Big run ups before a crash often helps.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2021, 10:25:38 PM by spartana »

Jack0Life

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 409
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #33 on: January 13, 2021, 11:18:11 PM »
I know this is just a what IF scenario but it doesn't seem plausible.
Looking at historical numbers, the worst run was 73&74 when the market dropped 17% and 29%. Also in 2000&01&02 when it dropped 10% 13% and 23%, Even through those times it wasn't 50%.
While 50% could happened, 70% is far fetched.



i still stand by what I said.
Let's not count the Great Depression because that's an outlier and will never happened again in our lifetime.
Your chart is based on peak to bottom, what I stated was yearly returns.

helloyou

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 288
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #34 on: January 14, 2021, 02:15:02 AM »
I know this is just a what IF scenario but it doesn't seem plausible.
Looking at historical numbers, the worst run was 73&74 when the market dropped 17% and 29%. Also in 2000&01&02 when it dropped 10% 13% and 23%, Even through those times it wasn't 50%.
While 50% could happened, 70% is far fetched.



i still stand by what I said.
Let's not count the Great Depression because that's an outlier and will never happened again in our lifetime.
Your chart is based on peak to bottom, what I stated was yearly returns.

As much as I'd like to believe that such drop will never happen... What evidence you have to say it will never happen again?

vand

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1426
  • Location: UK
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #35 on: January 14, 2021, 05:32:42 AM »
I somehow feel this is appropriate


Malcat

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5903
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #36 on: January 14, 2021, 06:56:18 AM »
If you are close to FIRE, you should have a plan for handling SORR that fits with your specific risk tolerance.

Personally, I would be far more concerned about global civil unrest and everyone's safety if the global markets dropped 70%.

Abe Froman

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 140
  • Location: Greater Chicago
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #37 on: January 14, 2021, 07:46:39 AM »
If you are close to FIRE, you should have a plan for handling SORR that fits with your specific risk tolerance.

Personally, I would be far more concerned about global civil unrest and everyone's safety if the global markets dropped 70%.

And then its BUY BUY BUY til it hurts!

Metta

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 707
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #38 on: January 14, 2021, 08:00:09 AM »
We would, but at 70 percent it would be very tight. Fifty percent crash is fine. It basically gives us our living expenses. I echo what someone else here said. When we decided we were FIRE we did it based on the question of could we survive a 50 percent crash because we knew one would come.

What we feel less comfortable with is runaway inflation, though we think that our stock-heavy portfolio will be ok. But it adds a level of unpredictability to expenses that’s harder to reckon with.

GuitarStv

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 17835
  • Age: 39
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #39 on: January 14, 2021, 08:28:23 AM »
That's why you keep bonds.  When your stocks have tanked, you take your money out of bonds for a few years until the market recovers.

Which bonds? If you get corporate bonds they'll tank as well as we've seen during march crash. And if company becomes insolvent they won't pay interest anyway. So your bonds are not worth anything if the pay are cut.

The only bonds which are guaranteed to pay are the treasury bonds.. but then we're close to 0% interest.

I can't see bond very helpful if we see a 50-70% crash tbh..

I own bonds and some bond funds (that are a combination of treasury, municipal, and corporate bonds).  They were still significant enough during the '07/'08 crash that I'd have been able to live off them until my toilet level stocks had all recovered.  They don't perform as well as stocks during average/good years - don't expect them to but that's not why you hold them.

YttriumNitrate

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1188
  • Location: Northwest Indiana
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #40 on: January 14, 2021, 08:33:52 AM »
I think it depends on the length of the crash as much as the severity of the crash. The market dropping 70% and staying down at that level for five years is quite different than the market dropping 70% and recovering half the losses within six months.

Malcat

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5903
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #41 on: January 14, 2021, 08:37:53 AM »
If you are close to FIRE, you should have a plan for handling SORR that fits with your specific risk tolerance.

Personally, I would be far more concerned about global civil unrest and everyone's safety if the global markets dropped 70%.

And then its BUY BUY BUY til it hurts!

The OP asked about people who are already retired. Where would they get the funds to buy?

Omy

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 765
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #42 on: January 14, 2021, 09:58:19 AM »
Some FIREd peeps hold cash and bonds for buying opportunities. I've even heard of some who use HELOCs to buy discounted stocks.

spartana

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2192
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #43 on: January 14, 2021, 10:29:08 AM »
Some FIREd peeps hold cash and bonds for buying opportunities. I've even heard of some who use HELOCs to buy discounted stocks.
That's true. I bought a bunch of deeply discount stocks during the 2008 recession (and I bought a cheap foreclosure in a HCOLA) as I did have some extra cash around. But you roll the dice a bit because you never know how long a downturn will last or how far it drops.  Maybe to nothing and never recovers.  Same with the housing market crash. It's a level of risk many FIRE people aren't comfortable making.

American GenX

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 717
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #44 on: January 14, 2021, 11:23:48 AM »
Some FIREd peeps hold cash and bonds for buying opportunities. I've even heard of some who use HELOCs to buy discounted stocks.

I would think that most would hold cash or bonds as part of their AA and rebalance when stocks are down, ie "buying stocks".  How often someone rebalances is another matter.

Malcat

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5903
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #45 on: January 14, 2021, 11:53:20 AM »
Some FIREd peeps hold cash and bonds for buying opportunities. I've even heard of some who use HELOCs to buy discounted stocks.

I would think that most would hold cash or bonds as part of their AA and rebalance when stocks are down, ie "buying stocks".  How often someone rebalances is another matter.

That's assuming they aren't depending on living on that cash as part of their strategy to not sell during a massive and prolonged crash.

Fishindude

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2752
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #46 on: January 15, 2021, 11:35:00 AM »
It would be no fun, but we're good.   
Have a fair amount of cash, income from real estate, income from a business and some other "non stock market" investments.

bmjohnson35

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 333
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #47 on: January 16, 2021, 10:46:47 AM »

Just like many others have stated, we have a PLAN to deal with major dips in the market.  Otherwise, we wouldn't be FIRE'D.  Now if Obamacare suddenly went away, I would have to find a job that provided healthcare insurance, preferably part-time. 

seattlecyclone

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5856
  • Age: 36
  • Location: Seattle, WA
    • My blog
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #48 on: January 16, 2021, 08:13:26 PM »
We had more than 25x expenses invested when I left my corporate job. That would no longer be the case if the market dropped 50-70%, but the whole point of the SWR research was to identify a spending level that would be resistant to market declines of the intensity and duration that we've seen in the past. If a bigger, more long-lasting decline than we've ever seen before happens next year, all bets are off.

Much Fishing to Do

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 888
Re: If the market crash 50-70%, would you still be FIRE?
« Reply #49 on: January 17, 2021, 07:18:59 AM »
I backtest my portfolio/portfolio changes assuming a FIRE date at the beginning of the 2000 drop and the 2007.  2000 (given it then gets hit by 2007) would have been a rough ride, but that's assuming no change in spending which I've got room to do, and assumes even rebalancing throughout when in fact my plan is to spend down from the 4 years of cash I carry for the first big drop I encounter.

One of the little things I like about the 4% SWR is a 20% portfolio drop (which I would see once at around a 30% market drop) puts you at a 5% SWR, which I consider a reasonable SWR anyway for someone with some spending flexibility, so it really would take the market to drop more than 30% before I'd even consider it an event. 

Yes, a 70% drop would hurt bigtime, and if I was still working would keep my job, and if not still working might start looking for part time work.  Though I'm willing to take the chance I'm too old to care or gone before that happens....