I'm sure I will get facepunched, but 75% of my investments are currently in T-bills, CD ladders, money market funds or municipal bond funds. The T-bills were purchased on the secondary market at a discount through the recommendation of my financial advisor.
I mean if you decided on the 4% rule, then CDs and Tbills are beats it right now and there's no risk.
Just to be clear, this strategy is not what the 4% rule means and will likely cause the 4% rule to fail moreso than a portfolio with stocks.
Go ahead and find me a period where if you had a portion of your portfolio in CDs earning more than 4% and the 4% rule fail.
Let's say I have a $1 million dollar portfolio.
CD's are 5% right now so I decided to put 50% of my portfolio in 10yr CDs.
-So for the nest 10 yrs, the market is crap and not producing over >4%, of of course this strategy fail but if I was 100% stock, I'd be in worst shape.
-Next 10 yrs, market is booming, my 50% stocks is making way over 5%, my 50% CDs still making over 4%. No failure here.
So in what scenario where if I allocate in CDs over 4% would I fail ?? The only way I fail is if the market is tanking in which case, I'm better off because a portion of my portfolio is making over 4%
Now if you tell me you're probably end up making more money by leaving a majority of your portfolio in stock(index), then I wouldn't disagree.