Good signs regarding nuclear escalation:
“In terms of the further act of terrorism on the territory of Russia, the Russian reply will be harsh and will be corresponding to the level of threat to the Russian Federation, have no doubt about it.”
The brash chatter about nuclear weapons has died down and now the talk is about
proportionality. The rather conventional response against Ukraine following the Kerch bridge incident are another sign of a lack of willingness to meaningfully escalate.
There are also
suggestions that the Kremlin is interested in opening negotiations, though the terms are unlikely to be of interest to Ukraine (there is some discussion in the article on how the US State Department doesn't find these overtures authentic, but really, what is to be gained by Russia by even suggesting this right now?).
This piece gives the view that the main players in Russia are perhaps near the point of withdrawing to defend their own bases of power, suggesting the domestic situation is now becoming a far more important consideration than the adventurism in Ukraine.
Galeev's recent posts have been far less impressive than his earlier stuff for setting historical and cultural context, but
this one is very well done, with some gory speculative details as well. A funny way of telling Musk to stay in his own lane, as well as emphasizing his earlier points about the pathological deficiencies of mafia-states.
The weight of evidence suggests rapidly growing weakness from Russia, but many have gone bankrupt attempting Kremlinology.