I'm voting for the best candidate, Libertarian Governor Gary Johnson.
Gary Johnson wants to abolish the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). He believes that if a big corporation pollutes then we can just take that corporation to court. I'm sure a single attorney I hire is really going to succeed against a highly paid law firm representing a corporation that pollutes the environment. Libertarianism is a pipe dream and really just becomes it's own form of capital cronyism.
Hillary isn't perfect but at least she would appoint someone to head the EPA who would stop polluters and make them pay up.
It's more likely she'll appoint someone who has made a large contribution to the DNC.
Senator Elizabeth Warren was put forward by Obama to run the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and it was shot down by the Republicans in the Senate. In a similar vein, Hillary would appoint competent knowledgeable experts to cabinet level posts.
If you vote for Gary Johnson he would abolish this agency altogether.
Regarding abolishing the EPA that Johnson wants to do, this would be disastrous for communities with pollution problems.
In Ann Arbor, there is a chemical called Dioxane - it has contaminated groundwater in an industrial site - it's close to the drinking water systems.
The multi-billion dollar corporation won't clean it up.
The Republican led State legislature is not passing a law that would increase the safety standard for Dioxane.
The EPA is probably the last chance for the city of Ann Arbor to not face a contaminated drinking water problem 5 years down the road. EPA would force the hand of Danaher corporation.
The courts are not required to make Danaher clean it up cause the company meets the bare minimum of cleaning - which science now shows is insufficient.
The problem is not Hillary's appointments to cabinet level posts, the problem is apathy by jaded voters who don't care about these or any issues and want a sound bite, like "I'm a Libertarian!", "She's Corrupt," "Emails"