I never blamed "everything anti-Trump on liberals" nor did I speak to liberals as the only ones who disapprove.
Um yeah you did. I bolded all groups/people on your post (Notice it's only liberals):
Actually, no I didn't. You need to re-read my previous statement, because it clearly went over your head. Speaking about a group of people doesn't mean that another group of people might or might not give Trump a favorable approval rating. They are NOT mutually exclusive, as I explained before. I never spoke to approval ratings one way or another in the post that you responded to with the straw man. I never said that "only liberals" would give Trump an unfavorable rating, let alone anyone else. That's apples and oranges. Like I said, straw man argument, because you had no argument for what I actually said is so common among liberals.
You weren't implying Trump impacted the market but were blaming liberals for not giving him credit for impacting the market?
Go back and re-read. In my original comment, I said liberals can't have it both ways - blaming when the market is headed down while not giving credit when it goes up. Pretty simple concept. I like how you spun it around that I was saying he deserve the credit or blame. and totally missed that part where I was talking about the liberals' viewpoints, even though you later put the word in "bold" multiple times. That looks like a contradiction on your part. I was talking about liberals (this doesn't necessarily exclude some non-liberals from feeling the same way), which I normally wouldn't have to bother mentioning, but it appears that saying liberals, you always interpret to mean "all and only liberals, with out exception" or you think I'm talking about my own views despite saying liberal. Welcome to the interwebs. LOL
FYI, there is no new healthcare, no tax reform, etc.
Your reading comprehension is the worst, or you are playing dumb. Which is it? You asked how the stock market could go up so much when Trump was elected and hadn't implemented any policies yet. I explained why that is the case, simply because of his agenda which was known before he ever got elected, and economic experts have said as much as well.
Fortunately, jobs have been added and the market has gone up ever since he was elected. Of course, you liberals won't give him credit. Tax cuts are yet to come, they just might be put off until 2018. He's already cutting Obama regulations. He has the authority to make changes - not everything has to be legislation that is signed into law, but I'm sure we'll see more of that happen. Don't panic - the best days are ahead. Keep riding the Trump stock market climb for now.
"very fine people on both sides" meaning there were fine counter-protesters and fine Neo-Nazis/White Supremacist.
He was speaking of the non-violent protesters that didn't want to see historical statues removed, who were also there protesting, who were not in the white supremacist or other groups. When he said that there was blame on both sides, he was referring to the violence, which he actually went into in further detail. He NEVER condoned racism of any sort.
I disagree about jumping the gun and calling someone racist without knowing the facts. You shouldn't call someone a racist if you aren't certain of it. Do you realize that some people were falsely accused as being protesters because someone thought they "looked like" a person photographed? He and his family were threatened repeatedly.
These days, even the term "racist" is so loosely used, that you have to question the facts of the case if used out of context. For example, some people say that if you want to lower taxes, you're racist. If you want stronger sentencing for drug crimes, you're racist. If you want to help your white children with homework, you're a dream hoarder, and that's racist. It's ridiculous. True racism should be called out, and it's a shame that so many have hijacked the term to take away the true meaning. If someone is truly racist, they should keep it to themselves and not act out on it.
Trump indeed called out racism in his official response once he had all the facts. The fact he condemned violence on both sides doesn't take away that fact that he said:
"Racism is evil, and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans."
Of course, that doesn't align with the liberals' narrative.
Topic: So Let's Speculate about the Future of a Full Trump Presidency... (Read 1401729 times)
