Author Topic: Mysterious 'Area 6' landing strip by Area 51.  (Read 1499 times)

FIRE4Science

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Mysterious 'Area 6' landing strip by Area 51.
« on: March 14, 2016, 10:50:52 AM »
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2016/03/09/mysterious-area-6-landing-strip-in-nevada-desert-baffles-experts.html?intcmp=trending

This airstrip is right next to the old S4 hangar that Bob Lazar was talking about. Btw, if you use google earth, the photo'ed airstrip is 12 miles southeast of Area 51. Not 12 miles northeast as mentioned wrongly in the article.

So what do you think the real black budget is for 2016?

They are building a lot every year within the restricted zones with their stache of taxed money from the consumers and workers.

What do you think?

Vertical Mode

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 529
  • Location: Central MA
Re: Mysterious 'Area 6' landing strip by Area 51.
« Reply #1 on: March 14, 2016, 12:09:24 PM »
Saw that story...

I think their explanation about developing and testing drone/UAV sensors in mountainous/hostile areas not unlike the conditions where many drone missions actually occur is actually fairly plausible. Couldn't they have just built out new runways at Groom Lake away from the public eye otherwise? Also probably helps that they wouldn't need to alter the existing JANET flight paths much to get employees in/out of that location.

The money for these things has to be coming from somewhere, I suspect if anyone actually audited things closely they'd find a lot of "$800 hammers" on DOD's budget, or the USAF. I suspect that's sort of why they don't...

Do you find Bob Lazar's accounts of S4 and Area 51 credible? I thought it was odd that they found his name in the Los Alamos phone book, but there's otherwise barely any record of the guy...


FIRE4Science

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Mysterious 'Area 6' landing strip by Area 51.
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2016, 07:12:16 AM »
I do find Bob Lazar's accounts very credible. One main reason was because he wasn't doing it for the money, and his explanations sounded like truth more then millions of lies. The naval paycheck is the  interesting evidence here.
Historically though, he was the whistleblower on Area 51's existence. Which has finally been publicly shared by the gov that it exists after sooo much lying and denial by the government.

I do like the theoritical explainations and claims of the reverse engineering he did, and it makes sense to me as a physicist and engineer. I don't dismiss "new" ideas/theories so easily as the average person does. Even if a hint of some truth is in his claims, then that's a much greater "awakening" of knowledge then what modern science has going for it with their focus on making as much money as possible with monthly journals.

Btw you may enjoy this. A Google Earth timelapse of the airstrip in the article: https://youtu.be/wJpKBKHGSr4
« Last Edit: March 25, 2016, 07:13:51 AM by FIRE4Science »

 

Wow, a phone plan for fifteen bucks!