Author Topic: Brock Turner  (Read 21760 times)

2buttons

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 393
Brock Turner
« on: June 08, 2016, 07:43:03 PM »
Did he rape her? What happened that night?

SwordGuy

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8964
  • Location: Fayetteville, NC
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2016, 07:53:51 PM »
Yes.  He did.  He is a sack of shit that should have been in prison for some years instead of county jail for 3 to 6 months.

Kriegsspiel

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 962
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2016, 05:17:15 AM »
In the billiard room with a lead pipe.

seattlecyclone

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7262
  • Age: 39
  • Location: Seattle, WA
    • My blog
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2016, 08:00:06 AM »
From what I've read, everyone who was there agreed that he raped her. However the legal system really messed up here, as is too often the case with sexual assault. The right to confront your accuser in court and try to instill reasonable doubt are very important rights, but they tend to lead to victim blaming. It's on us as citizens who might serve in a jury to recognize that for what it is when we see it.

2buttons

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 393
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2016, 08:23:18 AM »
Here is what does not add up to me.

Rape charge was on the table, and jury didn't convict on rape charge. Why? 

He ended up convicted of sexual assault with intent to rape.  If they were able to get that, why couldn't they prove rape if you had two witnesses?

Does that mean the rape kit was inconclusive and the two Swedes didn't actually testify to rape? 

Does anyone know what the deal is here? Do we have any criminal attorneys on here?

Something is not adding up, and all the reporting I see is weak on facts and heavy on ideology.  Note - I think rapists are amongst the most deplorable people in the world, but I also think everyone is entitled to their day in court.

tooqk4u22

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2846
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2016, 08:50:07 AM »
Here is what does not add up to me.

Rape charge was on the table, and jury didn't convict on rape charge. Why? 

He ended up convicted of sexual assault with intent to rape.  If they were able to get that, why couldn't they prove rape if you had two witnesses?

Does that mean the rape kit was inconclusive and the two Swedes didn't actually testify to rape? 

Does anyone know what the deal is here? Do we have any criminal attorneys on here?

Something is not adding up, and all the reporting I see is weak on facts and heavy on ideology.  Note - I think rapists are amongst the most deplorable people in the world, but I also think everyone is entitled to their day in court.

It comes down to legal definitions and standards, which vary by state and fed.  Warning not a lawyer but generally to meet "rape" standard there has to be forceful action/threats and sexual intercourse.  In this case, the victim was unconscious so there was no forceful action and "reportedly" there was no sexual intercourse but there was penetration by other objects/fingers.

So of there was sexual intercourse then there wasn't sufficient witness testimony or evidence to support a conviction and given that the formal rape charges were dropped in a preliminary hearing means the prosecution didn't have it.

He was convicted of
-assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated woman
-sexually penetrating an intoxicated person with a foreign object
-sexually penetrating an unconscious person with a foreign object

The sentence however makes no sense at all given that all of the above is still horrific and allows for a max sentence of 14 years. 

TheOldestYoungMan

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 778
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2016, 09:32:31 AM »
I read something that, and I just looked for it and didn't see it again, but what I recall is that the victim has no memory of the actual acts, and wouldn't know it had happened if they hadn't been told (no physical discomfort, bruising, physical awareness or memory at all).

Not saying its right, but if its true that probably played a part in the light sentence.

I do believe campus rape is an important issue, I do believe that any rape is an important issue.  I am not sure that this case is the right hill to die on.  It's sort of similar to picking to whiskey-drinking apartment-to-herself flame-my-boss-in-public girl as the poster child for wealth inequality.

It sounds an awful lot like two people were headed to the nearest horizontal surface to fool around, and one passed out before the other.  As soon as your partner passes out, you should stop.  But I don't know if 14 years in prison is really justice for being too drunk to notice someone passed out.  And there's every indication that could be exactly what happened.

I wasn't there, either in the courtroom or the alley (and the "behind the dumpster in the alley" thing I think is what makes this seem more clear cut than it is - some of you may never have been drunk enough to think having sex behind a dumpster is a reasonable plan).  But if you believe in the rule of law, in innocent until proven guilty, then anything that happens between two drunk people is always going to be difficult to reconstruct the next day.  And when that happens the presumption of innocence was agreed upon, outside the heat of any particular circumstance, by everyone, to be the right thing to do.

So if what happened was a guy and girl are flirting it up, both drinking way too much, both get totally wasted and decide to leave together, and make it as far as the alley before they start making out, and then things move into the pants, and then she passes out and he keeps going, and some passersby see it and pull him off (noticing she looks passed out with her head on his shoulder, or w/e).  And then he's too drunk to really explain himself, which gets misinterpreted as "guilty looking"  (and any 20 year old who was just doing that is going to look guilty, hell I'd look guilty if you walked in on me with my finger there).  Has he done something wrong?  Lets say sure.

He gets a ruined reputation (his name now pops up with a "don't be a rapist meme").  That by itself, his life is likely going to be total shit forever.  He also gets 6 months in jail.  He is absolutely going to be raped there, over and over.  After that, congratulations felon, you can't work at 80% of jobs.

And!  You get to register as a sex offender and can't live in 80% of housing (because it's too close to schools).

It is really really difficult for me to think that all of this isn't enough punishment for what wouldn't be a crime if the victim could remember what had happened (and was OK with it, which, admittedly, it's unlikely she was like, lets go finger bang behind that dumpster).


RetiredAt63

  • CMTO 2023 Attendees
  • Senior Mustachian
  • *
  • Posts: 20798
  • Location: Eastern Ontario, Canada
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2016, 09:52:43 AM »
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/world/98you+took+away+worth+full+statement+rape+victim+delivered+attacker/11967722/story.html
Here is the victim statement.  She went out with her sister.  Her condition when the guys arrived was not that someone who was engaged in consensual sex and then passed out.

Trauma victims often have memory loss, I know someone who was in a severe car accident and has no memory of the events just prior to the accident.

TravelJunkyQC

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 466
  • Age: 37
  • Location: Québec City, Canada
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2016, 09:56:22 AM »
This issue is that he ran and had to be tackled by the witnesses and kept there until police arrived. If he was too drunk to realize his "partner" was unconscious, he was too drunk to run. He ran. He knew he did something wrong. He was aware.

rockstache

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7270
  • Age: 11
  • Location: Southeast
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2016, 10:25:47 AM »


He gets a ruined reputation (his name now pops up with a "don't be a rapist meme").  That by itself, his life is likely going to be total shit forever.  He also gets 6 months in jail.  He is absolutely going to be raped there, over and over.  After that, congratulations felon, you can't work at 80% of jobs.

And!  You get to register as a sex offender and can't live in 80% of housing (because it's too close to schools).

It is really really difficult for me to think that all of this isn't enough punishment for what wouldn't be a crime if the victim could remember what had happened (and was OK with it, which, admittedly, it's unlikely she was like, lets go finger bang behind that dumpster).

I don't think he is absolutely going to be raped in jail (and I definitely don't advocate rape as a punishment for rape). He is going to the county jail to be separated from the general population for his safety. He will probably take a few accidental punches/elbows by some guards, but I don't think he will be seriously harmed. As for the social consequences - meh. He should have to register as a sex offender. He is one.

SwordGuy

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8964
  • Location: Fayetteville, NC
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2016, 11:04:25 AM »
and can't live in 80% of housing (because it's too close to schools).

Dead wrong. 

I suggest you look at your state's sex offender registry site.  NC has one that puts their addresses on a map.  There are about 500 in my county alone and they are all over the county.   They don't tend to be in the highest price neighborhoods simply because most don't have the jobs that would support the mortgage or rent, but there's nothing to stop them.

In a perfect world 90% of them would have been executed.

EMP

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 344
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2016, 11:13:12 AM »
I read something that, and I just looked for it and didn't see it again, but what I recall is that the victim has no memory of the actual acts, and wouldn't know it had happened if they hadn't been told (no physical discomfort, bruising, physical awareness or memory at all).

Not saying its right, but if its true that probably played a part in the light sentence.

I do believe campus rape is an important issue, I do believe that any rape is an important issue.  I am not sure that this case is the right hill to die on.  It's sort of similar to picking to whiskey-drinking apartment-to-herself flame-my-boss-in-public girl as the poster child for wealth inequality.

It sounds an awful lot like two people were headed to the nearest horizontal surface to fool around, and one passed out before the other.  As soon as your partner passes out, you should stop.  But I don't know if 14 years in prison is really justice for being too drunk to notice someone passed out.  And there's every indication that could be exactly what happened.

I wasn't there, either in the courtroom or the alley (and the "behind the dumpster in the alley" thing I think is what makes this seem more clear cut than it is - some of you may never have been drunk enough to think having sex behind a dumpster is a reasonable plan).  But if you believe in the rule of law, in innocent until proven guilty, then anything that happens between two drunk people is always going to be difficult to reconstruct the next day.  And when that happens the presumption of innocence was agreed upon, outside the heat of any particular circumstance, by everyone, to be the right thing to do.

So if what happened was a guy and girl are flirting it up, both drinking way too much, both get totally wasted and decide to leave together, and make it as far as the alley before they start making out, and then things move into the pants, and then she passes out and he keeps going, and some passersby see it and pull him off (noticing she looks passed out with her head on his shoulder, or w/e).  And then he's too drunk to really explain himself, which gets misinterpreted as "guilty looking"  (and any 20 year old who was just doing that is going to look guilty, hell I'd look guilty if you walked in on me with my finger there).  Has he done something wrong?  Lets say sure.

He gets a ruined reputation (his name now pops up with a "don't be a rapist meme").  That by itself, his life is likely going to be total shit forever.  He also gets 6 months in jail.  He is absolutely going to be raped there, over and over.  After that, congratulations felon, you can't work at 80% of jobs.

And!  You get to register as a sex offender and can't live in 80% of housing (because it's too close to schools).

It is really really difficult for me to think that all of this isn't enough punishment for what wouldn't be a crime if the victim could remember what had happened (and was OK with it, which, admittedly, it's unlikely she was like, lets go finger bang behind that dumpster).

The important thing, to me, is that this is not the first time judge Aaron Persky has given an especially lenient sentence to a rapist. Evidently Judge Persky is not concerned that the victim has a life sentence.

And, as I have never attempted to sodomize anyone that is passed out drunk, I really don't understand why the above poster is throwing the victim under the bus. But thanks for the proof that rape culture is alive and well.

Gin1984

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4931
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2016, 11:17:07 AM »
I read something that, and I just looked for it and didn't see it again, but what I recall is that the victim has no memory of the actual acts, and wouldn't know it had happened if they hadn't been told (no physical discomfort, bruising, physical awareness or memory at all).

Not saying its right, but if its true that probably played a part in the light sentence.

I do believe campus rape is an important issue, I do believe that any rape is an important issue.  I am not sure that this case is the right hill to die on. It's sort of similar to picking to whiskey-drinking apartment-to-herself flame-my-boss-in-public girl as the poster child for wealth inequality.

It sounds an awful lot like two people were headed to the nearest horizontal surface to fool around, and one passed out before the other.
As soon as your partner passes out, you should stop.  But I don't know if 14 years in prison is really justice for being too drunk to notice someone passed out. And there's every indication that could be exactly what happened.

I wasn't there, either in the courtroom or the alley (and the "behind the dumpster in the alley" thing I think is what makes this seem more clear cut than it is - some of you may never have been drunk enough to think having sex behind a dumpster is a reasonable plan).  But if you believe in the rule of law, in innocent until proven guilty, then anything that happens between two drunk people is always going to be difficult to reconstruct the next day.  And when that happens the presumption of innocence was agreed upon, outside the heat of any particular circumstance, by everyone, to be the right thing to do.

So if what happened was a guy and girl are flirting it up, both drinking way too much, both get totally wasted and decide to leave together, and make it as far as the alley before they start making out, and then things move into the pants, and then she passes out and he keeps going, and some passersby see it and pull him off (noticing she looks passed out with her head on his shoulder, or w/e).  And then he's too drunk to really explain himself, which gets misinterpreted as "guilty looking"  (and any 20 year old who was just doing that is going to look guilty, hell I'd look guilty if you walked in on me with my finger there).  Has he done something wrong?  Lets say sure.

He gets a ruined reputation (his name now pops up with a "don't be a rapist meme").  That by itself, his life is likely going to be total shit forever.  He also gets 6 months in jail.  He is absolutely going to be raped there, over and over.  After that, congratulations felon, you can't work at 80% of jobs.

And!  You get to register as a sex offender and can't live in 80% of housing (because it's too close to schools).

It is really really difficult for me to think that all of this isn't enough punishment for what wouldn't be a crime if the victim could remember what had happened (and was OK with it, which, admittedly, it's unlikely she was like, lets go finger bang behind that dumpster).
Bull fucking SHIT.  He was not "so drunk as to not notice".  He dragged an unconscious woman to assault her and was sober enough to know it was wrong by evidence that he FUCKING RAN AWAY when caught.  And yes this is the perfect case, you don't have sex with someone unable to consent.  And when someone is drunk, they cannot consent.  He knew it, which is why he attempted to flee the scene of the crime.  And the reason he got a light sentence was the judge is a piece shit who is fine with women being raped.  That is the only explanation for it. 

deadlymonkey

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #14 on: June 09, 2016, 11:23:47 AM »


He gets a ruined reputation (his name now pops up with a "don't be a rapist meme").  That by itself, his life is likely going to be total shit forever.  He also gets 6 months in jail.  He is absolutely going to be raped there, over and over.  After that, congratulations felon, you can't work at 80% of jobs.

And!  You get to register as a sex offender and can't live in 80% of housing (because it's too close to schools).

It is really really difficult for me to think that all of this isn't enough punishment for what wouldn't be a crime if the victim could remember what had happened (and was OK with it, which, admittedly, it's unlikely she was like, lets go finger bang behind that dumpster).

I don't think he is absolutely going to be raped in jail (and I definitely don't advocate rape as a punishment for rape). He is going to the county jail to be separated from the general population for his safety. He will probably take a few accidental punches/elbows by some guards, but I don't think he will be seriously harmed. As for the social consequences - meh. He should have to register as a sex offender. He is one.

Agreed, super guilty and should absolutely needs a longer sentence.  However, at the risk of being shunned, I think the poster above may have meant something else, but worded it poorly.

Not to distract from people suffering sexual assault like the woman in this case, there is however a not insignificant number of claims of assault where there probably wasn't any.  There is also a strong tendency to always demonize the male in these cases.  In a hypothetical example where both parties were completely drunk and had at the time consensual sex, the woman is free at any time afterward to claim assault, and unless the male submits a notarized affidavit of consent, he is guilty in the public eye at least.  It has been preached over and over again, and military leaders continue to preach it to younger troops..."If she has even 1 drink, regardless of what she says at the time, YOU are guilty."  This is because evidently a single drop of alcohol in your system makes you unable to give consent......but only if you are female.



That being said, this guy is a scummy predator that needs to be locked up for awhile.  At least he is a convicted offender and has to keep up with his notifications and limitations lest he be sent back to jail.

TVRodriguez

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 773
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #15 on: June 09, 2016, 11:33:39 AM »
This issue is that he ran and had to be tackled by the witnesses and kept there until police arrived. If he was too drunk to realize his "partner" was unconscious, he was too drunk to run. He ran. He knew he did something wrong. He was aware.

This.  And his "ruined reputation" is due to his own actions, hence not a punishment.

EMP

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 344
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #16 on: June 09, 2016, 11:38:31 AM »
I can't even with all the excuses being made for the RAPIST. Also here's a link to the victim's statement.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/katiejmbaker/heres-the-powerful-letter-the-stanford-victim-read-to-her-ra?utm_term=.ievP0vnL6#.lcAbpev7A

CheapskateWife

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1410
  • Location: Hill Country, TX - Being a blueberry in the Tomato Soup
  • FIRE'd and Loving it!
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #17 on: June 09, 2016, 11:48:33 AM »
For me one of the most glaring details pointing to rape is the fact that he had penetrated her with sticks, dirt, leaves, etc. 

At the risk of getting a little too graphic, how is that a turn on?  Is that sexually gratifying to the male?  Does it feel good to her or him?  Probably not.  He was inflicting HARM to an unconscious woman.  He was likely getting off on HURTING her, not having consensual or even non consensual sex with her.  He was raping her with foreign objects, and she was defenseless and passed out.

So yes, I agree, it is possible to get drunk and not really be your best self.  I agree that it is possible that she at one point consented to sex.  However, what he was doing to her was not sex.  It was rape the moment she became unconscious and he didn't stop. 

golden1

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Location: MA
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #18 on: June 09, 2016, 12:08:32 PM »
Quote
I read something that, and I just looked for it and didn't see it again, but what I recall is that the victim has no memory of the actual acts, and wouldn't know it had happened if they hadn't been told (no physical discomfort, bruising, physical awareness or memory at all).

Not saying its right, but if its true that probably played a part in the light sentence.

I do believe campus rape is an important issue, I do believe that any rape is an important issue.  I am not sure that this case is the right hill to die on.  It's sort of similar to picking to whiskey-drinking apartment-to-herself flame-my-boss-in-public girl as the poster child for wealth inequality.

It sounds an awful lot like two people were headed to the nearest horizontal surface to fool around, and one passed out before the other.  As soon as your partner passes out, you should stop.  But I don't know if 14 years in prison is really justice for being too drunk to notice someone passed out.  And there's every indication that could be exactly what happened.

I wasn't there, either in the courtroom or the alley (and the "behind the dumpster in the alley" thing I think is what makes this seem more clear cut than it is - some of you may never have been drunk enough to think having sex behind a dumpster is a reasonable plan).  But if you believe in the rule of law, in innocent until proven guilty, then anything that happens between two drunk people is always going to be difficult to reconstruct the next day.  And when that happens the presumption of innocence was agreed upon, outside the heat of any particular circumstance, by everyone, to be the right thing to do.

So if what happened was a guy and girl are flirting it up, both drinking way too much, both get totally wasted and decide to leave together, and make it as far as the alley before they start making out, and then things move into the pants, and then she passes out and he keeps going, and some passersby see it and pull him off (noticing she looks passed out with her head on his shoulder, or w/e).  And then he's too drunk to really explain himself, which gets misinterpreted as "guilty looking"  (and any 20 year old who was just doing that is going to look guilty, hell I'd look guilty if you walked in on me with my finger there).  Has he done something wrong?  Lets say sure.

He gets a ruined reputation (his name now pops up with a "don't be a rapist meme").  That by itself, his life is likely going to be total shit forever.  He also gets 6 months in jail.  He is absolutely going to be raped there, over and over.  After that, congratulations felon, you can't work at 80% of jobs.

And!  You get to register as a sex offender and can't live in 80% of housing (because it's too close to schools).

It is really really difficult for me to think that all of this isn't enough punishment for what wouldn't be a crime if the victim could remember what had happened (and was OK with it, which, admittedly, it's unlikely she was like, lets go finger bang behind that dumpster).

This statement epitomizes why we have such a difficult time handling and judging sex crimes in this country.  It's all about who you relate to and empathize with.  I honestly think most men don't really ever put much thought about what it is like to fully understand that your body can be violated at any time by someone stronger than you or if you are incapacitated (I get that boys and men also get sexually assaulted so don't go there.  I am saying that it is a much rarer occurrence and most men never think much about it.).  Also these crimes can be very difficult to prove concretely, and it is a second violation when a woman is subjected to invasive testing after her rape or sexual assault, and then put on the stand only to have her character judged by more strange men. 

I strongly urge any man to read the rape victim's statement.  It gives really good insight into what it actually feels like to be violated and how it just wrecks your sense of safety and confidence. 


deadlymonkey

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #19 on: June 09, 2016, 12:16:00 PM »
For me one of the most glaring details pointing to rape is the fact that he had penetrated her with sticks, dirt, leaves, etc. 

At the risk of getting a little too graphic, how is that a turn on?  Is that sexually gratifying to the male?  Does it feel good to her or him?  Probably not.  He was inflicting HARM to an unconscious woman.  He was likely getting off on HURTING her, not having consensual or even non consensual sex with her.  He was raping her with foreign objects, and she was defenseless and passed out.

So yes, I agree, it is possible to get drunk and not really be your best self.  I agree that it is possible that she at one point consented to sex.  However, what he was doing to her was not sex.  It was rape the moment she became unconscious and he didn't stop.

Not defending at all, just a little accuracy in reporting.  He never was accused of or convicted of violating her with sticks or anything like that.  She was laying in a dirty alley covered with leaves and dirt.  During the attack some of that debris got everywhere, but no one has said he took a stick and assaulted her with it.

Chris22

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3770
  • Location: Chicago NW Suburbs
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #20 on: June 09, 2016, 12:18:31 PM »

Agreed, super guilty and should absolutely needs a longer sentence.  However, at the risk of being shunned, I think the poster above may have meant something else, but worded it poorly.

Not to distract from people suffering sexual assault like the woman in this case, there is however a not insignificant number of claims of assault where there probably wasn't any.  There is also a strong tendency to always demonize the male in these cases.  In a hypothetical example where both parties were completely drunk and had at the time consensual sex, the woman is free at any time afterward to claim assault, and unless the male submits a notarized affidavit of consent, he is guilty in the public eye at least.  It has been preached over and over again, and military leaders continue to preach it to younger troops..."If she has even 1 drink, regardless of what she says at the time, YOU are guilty."  This is because evidently a single drop of alcohol in your system makes you unable to give consent......but only if you are female.



That being said, this guy is a scummy predator that needs to be locked up for awhile.  At least he is a convicted offender and has to keep up with his notifications and limitations lest he be sent back to jail.

Agreed.


jrhampt

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2020
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Connecticut
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #21 on: June 09, 2016, 12:19:09 PM »
In this case, I have no problem believing the testimony of the two eyewitnesses who saw the rape in progress and had to chase after the rapist, who ran when he was confronted.

golden1

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Location: MA
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #22 on: June 09, 2016, 12:35:54 PM »
This will probably make me very unpopular with the feminist crowd here, but I do think that drinking blurs the lines of consent for both parties.  In most sexual assault cases on campus, alcohol is involved in one way or another, and I DO think there are cases where women may signal consent when they are highly intoxicated only to regret the encounter and feel violated later.  I'm not sure how to get around that besides just not drinking to excess (both men and women so don't think I am only trying to modify women's behavior only).  The binge drinking culture is really harmful. 

tooqk4u22

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2846
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #23 on: June 09, 2016, 12:52:16 PM »
This statement epitomizes why we have such a difficult time handling and judging sex crimes in this country.  It's all about who you relate to and empathize with.  I honestly think most men don't really ever put much thought about what it is like to fully understand that your body can be violated at any time by someone stronger than you or if you are incapacitated (I get that boys and men also get sexually assaulted so don't go there.  I am saying that it is a much rarer occurrence and most men never think much about it.).  Also these crimes can be very difficult to prove concretely, and it is a second violation when a woman is subjected to invasive testing after her rape or sexual assault, and then put on the stand only to have her character judged by more strange men. 

I strongly urge any man to read the rape victim's statement.  It gives really good insight into what it actually feels like to be violated and how it just wrecks your sense of safety and confidence.

As a guy I fully agree with your statement - guys don't worry about this and generally speaking don't have to, but sadly women do have to worry about this. At least in this case the offender was caught, which is not always the case and even if it is, as you indicated, can be difficult to prove and get a conviction.   The victim in this case as tragic as it is at least didn't have to experience the ordeal in real time and limited to the post-effects indicated in her statement/letter - and she still will probably struggle to get over the fear, confidence hit, self-inflicted (but not deserved shame), and on and on.  As tough as that is, I honestly can't imagine how someone who was forcibly raped while conscious ever recovers but it happens. 

Unfortunately, women have to be vigilante, on-guard, and in control to reduce the possibility of these situations and even that doesn't guarantee it will never happen.  I know the real answer is to fix society and make it so bad people don't do bad things but that's going to take some time. And at the risk of sounding like I am blaming the victim, it is likely, but not certain, that this wouldn't have happened to her had she not been intoxicated to the point of unconsciousness and/or been with a buddy (where was her sister in all this) - again it shouldn't have happened, the guy is a scum bag, he should get more time than he did - but this is something women/girls should always have on their mind.

So while I want my wife or daughter to be able to go freely and not worry in situations that I otherwise wouldn't, that's not reality and I would rather reinforce and stress practices that don't increase the odds of such a situation - even now after many years with my wife whenever she goes out with friends I ask her to keep alcohol to a minimum or when she goes by herself (think shopping parking lots) I reminder her to be aware of her surroundings - she is no dummy, she is an adult, never puts herself in bad situations, but I still feel the need to remind.  It sucks, I know. 

TravelJunkyQC

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 466
  • Age: 37
  • Location: Québec City, Canada
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #24 on: June 09, 2016, 12:57:58 PM »
I agree that women can consent when drunk when they wouldn't otherwise. I also agree that drunk men can't legally give consent. However, it is BOTH of their responsibilities to know that if the other is drunk, no matter what they say, it cannot be trusted. A drunk woman says "yes" - take her number and call her another time. In this case, he was violating an unconscious person, and he himself was aware enough of his surroundings to run. That's all I need to know. He knew he was guilty of wrongdoing (and yet, when in court, he claims he wasn't aware of the wrongdoing... something doesn't fit there).

I know it's a very fuzzy line in general when alcohol is involved. And yes, binge drinking culture is bad. However, so is forgiving wrongdoing and blaming it on the alcohol. You can take the wheel while drunk and kill someone and be held accountable. Why shouldn't you be when you rape someone? Even at my most drunk in college, I knew to keep my hands to my damn self because I was raised that way. An entitled asshole is going to become more of an entitled asshole with alcohol... doesn't mean he isn't one when he's sober though, it just means he hasn't yet acted upon it.

In general, the lack of a "no" doesn't mean "yes". The only thing that means "yes" is an emphatic, sober, enthusiastic "yes". Anything else means "no".

And I'm repeating myself, but if you run, you aren't drunk enough to NOT realize the girl is unconscious. Jesus, if you get to the point that you can't tell that your partner isn't moving, you probably shouldn't be able to hold yourself up.

Chris22

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3770
  • Location: Chicago NW Suburbs
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #25 on: June 09, 2016, 01:08:15 PM »
I know it's a very fuzzy line in general when alcohol is involved. And yes, binge drinking culture is bad. However, so is forgiving wrongdoing and blaming it on the alcohol. You can take the wheel while drunk and kill someone and be held accountable. Why shouldn't you be when you rape someone?


The question is, if both parties are drunk, and didn't say no or yes, is it really rape?  In Brock's case, absolutely, it is.  But in the larger sense, especially in college, how many drunken yes's were sober no's and why is that the male's sole responsibility?

TheOldestYoungMan

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 778
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #26 on: June 09, 2016, 01:12:56 PM »
This issue is that he ran and had to be tackled by the witnesses and kept there until police arrived. If he was too drunk to realize his "partner" was unconscious, he was too drunk to run. He ran. He knew he did something wrong. He was aware.

This.  And his "ruined reputation" is due to his own actions, hence not a punishment.

I don't think he posted all those memes online.  Whether we as a society send someone to jail or publicly shun/shame it is still punishment.

I can run while drunk.  Maybe not fast enough to avoid being tackled by a swede.  I can also recognize when I've been accused of something and that I'm in some shit.  What I can't do is run with my pants around my ankles.  The idea that only guilty people run is a fallacy.

The swedes didn't testify that he was naked, they didn't testify that he was inside her, and even now they don't say that, as far as I found poking around on the interwebs.  They said they saw a guy laying on top of a woman who appeared to be unconscious, and when they challenged him he took off.  Not that he hurriedly got dressed and took off, not that he pulled out of her and took off.

That's sort of the point I was making, everyone is all outraged that the judge/jury got it wrong or whatever, but the events of that night are likely far more innocuous than my wild imaginings.


I strongly urge any man to read the rape victim's statement.  It gives really good insight into what it actually feels like to be violated and how it just wrecks your sense of safety and confidence. 


+1

Her statement is brilliant.  I read it right after my initial post, also the witness accounts, and the timeline of coverage, trials, bandwagon social justice-ing.

I think the guy probably crossed the line.  I think he should have been convicted, don't think anything I said was meaning that those things were undeserved.

My point was only that the sentence he got is a punishment.  It may be your opinion that 14 years in prison would better fit the crime, but I don't think so.  The guy has some jail time, and a lifetime of dealing with his criminal record and reputation.  That is a lot closer to justice than 14 years in prison.

There is a difference between justice and revenge.

babysnowbyrd

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 222
  • Age: 37
    • My Journal
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #27 on: June 09, 2016, 01:29:52 PM »
I read something that, and I just looked for it and didn't see it again, but what I recall is that the victim has no memory of the actual acts, and wouldn't know it had happened if they hadn't been told (no physical discomfort, bruising, physical awareness or memory at all).


True, the victim did not have memory of the event, but absolutely had bruising, physical discomfort, scratches, vaginal lesions, bleeding etc. There was also the psychological discomfort of waking in the hospital, getting a rape kit done, police interviews, and then on top of that finding out later in a news report details of what happened to her: that she was discovered behind a dumpster, while she was being assaulted, and that her attacker ran off leaving her half naked with her dress pulled up.

Quote
Not saying its right, but if its true that probably played a part in the light sentence.


In a way yes, because she was unconscious, the attacker was able to to testify in court that she absolutely consented because no one else can say otherwise. Very very wrong, but I don't think THAT was the reason for the light sentence. There was obvious sympathy from the judge about his "promising athletic career."

Quote
...

It sounds an awful lot like two people were headed to the nearest horizontal surface to fool around, and one passed out before the other.  As soon as your partner passes out, you should stop.  But I don't know if 14 years in prison is really justice for being too drunk to notice someone passed out.  And there's every indication that could be exactly what happened.


"I don't know if 14 years in prison is really justice for being too drunk to notice someone passed out." Really? Really? I can't believe people write stuff like this. There is NOT "every indication that could be exactly what happened." Nearest horizontal surface at a party is usually at the party or very close by (bedrooms, couches, etc.) Behind a dumpster is where a predator takes a victim in order to avoid notice. The evidence (and conviction) point to a deliberate assault. He knew she was unconscious. He knew full well what he was doing. He RAN AWAY leaving her half naked in the dirt.

Might be a good idea to read some actual facts about the case before saying things like "It sounds an awful lot like..."
[/quote]

TravelJunkyQC

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 466
  • Age: 37
  • Location: Québec City, Canada
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #28 on: June 09, 2016, 01:43:33 PM »
I know it's a very fuzzy line in general when alcohol is involved. And yes, binge drinking culture is bad. However, so is forgiving wrongdoing and blaming it on the alcohol. You can take the wheel while drunk and kill someone and be held accountable. Why shouldn't you be when you rape someone?


The question is, if both parties are drunk, and didn't say no or yes, is it really rape?  In Brock's case, absolutely, it is.  But in the larger sense, especially in college, how many drunken yes's were sober no's and why is that the male's sole responsibility?

I agree that it often falls on the male to be "responsible" in these cases, and no I don't think it's right. And I think the problem with rape cases is that there are times that a woman will cry rape when it shouldn't actually be considered rape - and it makes us doubt the victim at all times. Rape culture is not only forgiving men that shouldn't be forgiven, it is also allowing women to cry rape when what they actually feel is regret. I don't have the answer. But in this case, I don't think it's really a gray area. This isn't a case of her crying rape a week later because her friend told her what happened and she thought she shouldn't have done it. This is a case of someone violating someone else's unconscious body. Those cases are very different.

It pains me that we have to doubt victims. And it pains me that men are held responsible at some times when both should be held responsible. Unfortunately, this is the system in which we're in at the moment. At least have an open dialogue about it could help find the right answer?

TheOldestYoungMan

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 778
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #29 on: June 09, 2016, 01:51:37 PM »


The important thing, to me, is that this is not the first time judge Aaron Persky has given an especially lenient sentence to a rapist. Evidently Judge Persky is not concerned that the victim has a life sentence.

And, as I have never attempted to sodomize anyone that is passed out drunk, I really don't understand why the above poster is throwing the victim under the bus. But thanks for the proof that rape culture is alive and well.
[/quote]

I didn't throw the victim under the bus.  I didn't say and don't believe it was her fault.  I actually can't believe what a colossal dumbass this kid was for leaving the bar with a girl that drunk (you put those ones in a cab with their license spit-stuck to their forehead because they'll be asleep before you can get them to the apartment - I'm an inside the box thinker, in the alley by the dumpster wouldn't have occurred to me).  I wasn't aware that someone had sent the victim to prison for life.  I absolutely don't support that.  She should be set free. 

Everything I've said is focused on the perp and his sentence.  The victim has a statement where most of the bad things she is describing are a result of everyone else's reaction to the rape which she doesn't have any personal knowledge of.  Blaming the victim looks different.  That's saying things like "she shouldn't have gotten black out drunk."  I support everyone's right to get black out drunk, wake up in an alley half naked with grass in their hair, and wonder what the fuck happened last night.  God bless America, let us never change.

Finding out you got raped/assaulted is totally unacceptable though.  Getting raped/assaulted is totally unacceptable regardless of what led up to it.  No means No.  Yes means yes.  And unconscious means time to stop.

That sounds bad.  I don't meant to imply that this is like when a baby falls off a couch and hits her head, and all the adults pretend it is no big deal, because if the baby sees an adult freak out it'll freak out.  This is definitely worse than that.  But there are elements to her experience, and from her statement it is absolutely clear that she understand this, where the worst part was what came after.  And that's all on the perp too, as the originator, but we're sort of accomplices.  No amount of ensuring the perpetrator gets raped is going to make this right.  It's possible that in this case what should have happened did happen (not the rape, talking about the conviction and sentencing).

My point is that there is no way for us to know what happened.  We have the statement from the victim, the two witnesses and the perpetrator.  And the scene they lay out could have played out a number of ways.  In not all of those ways is this perpetrator a total-scumbag-rapist.  Two drunk people left a bar together, and then later one was found, in a condition where he was capable of running, laying on top of the other who was unconscious.  When approached by two hostile Swedish gentleman, this champion swimmer chose flight, but due to his inebriated condition was tackled by one of the swedes.

Is that what happened?  Nah, this guy is a scumbag rapist.  Probably.  I can't know, and neither can you.

There's a possibility here, that two drunk people started humping in an alley, one passed out and the other is going to jail.

That is a possibility.  And if that's what happened, it's a little odd to get hysterical about a miscarriage of justice because he's not going to jail for longer.

And if the roles are reversed, and some woman is riding a guy in an alley and he passes out, she wouldn't be going to jail.

Because equality.  Also something about rape culture.  Wrong hill to die on.

TheOldestYoungMan

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 778
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #30 on: June 09, 2016, 01:55:58 PM »
I read something that, and I just looked for it and didn't see it again, but what I recall is that the victim has no memory of the actual acts, and wouldn't know it had happened if they hadn't been told (no physical discomfort, bruising, physical awareness or memory at all).


True, the victim did not have memory of the event, but absolutely had bruising, physical discomfort, scratches, vaginal lesions, bleeding etc. There was also the psychological discomfort of waking in the hospital, getting a rape kit done, police interviews, and then on top of that finding out later in a news report details of what happened to her: that she was discovered behind a dumpster, while she was being assaulted, and that her attacker ran off leaving her half naked with her dress pulled up.

Quote
Not saying its right, but if its true that probably played a part in the light sentence.


In a way yes, because she was unconscious, the attacker was able to to testify in court that she absolutely consented because no one else can say otherwise. Very very wrong, but I don't think THAT was the reason for the light sentence. There was obvious sympathy from the judge about his "promising athletic career."

Quote
...

It sounds an awful lot like two people were headed to the nearest horizontal surface to fool around, and one passed out before the other.  As soon as your partner passes out, you should stop.  But I don't know if 14 years in prison is really justice for being too drunk to notice someone passed out.  And there's every indication that could be exactly what happened.


"I don't know if 14 years in prison is really justice for being too drunk to notice someone passed out." Really? Really? I can't believe people write stuff like this. There is NOT "every indication that could be exactly what happened." Nearest horizontal surface at a party is usually at the party or very close by (bedrooms, couches, etc.) Behind a dumpster is where a predator takes a victim in order to avoid notice. The evidence (and conviction) point to a deliberate assault. He knew she was unconscious. He knew full well what he was doing. He RAN AWAY leaving her half naked in the dirt.

Might be a good idea to read some actual facts about the case before saying things like "It sounds an awful lot like..."
[/quote]

You are totally right.  I was shocked to find out the case was in California, because I swear I read a year or so ago they had adopted yes means yes legislation, which means that Brock, legally, raped this girl.  So it is a real shame they did not convict him.

Oh wait they did! and I said that it was punishment, and laid out some other corollary punishments that go along with it, and etc.

But you needed to feel holier than thou so glad I could be there for ya.

High five!

RetiredAt63

  • CMTO 2023 Attendees
  • Senior Mustachian
  • *
  • Posts: 20798
  • Location: Eastern Ontario, Canada
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #31 on: June 09, 2016, 03:04:22 PM »
When I was in university I knew a guy (this was 1968) who liked to get his dates drunk, take them back to res, and get into heavy necking (am I dating myself with terms here?).  I am sure that if a girl had been drunk enough he would have gone further.  From what I read and see it doesn't sound like things have changed much. I can also think of lots of ways for a woman to get more drunk than she thought she was, three easy examples are not having been drinking much lately so low tolerance (like the victim here), to having doubles that she thought were singles (easy to arrange if someone is getting her drink), to not having eaten beforehand.  I am not even mentioning rohypnol here, since I am sure the medical tests at the hospital would have checked for it.

Of course, as others have pointed out, true consensual sex is 2 enthusiastic sober people both saying an enthusiastic yes.  There is a lot of "consensual" sex where one or the other is being pressured (usually but not always the woman).

randymarsh

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1369
  • Location: Denver
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #32 on: June 09, 2016, 03:10:08 PM »
I think it's interesting that the people who seem most upset by this case are the young/feminist/social justice types. The same people who when it's black people going to jail for whatever, the story is they need to be rehabilitated and society needs to stop being so heavy handed. But with this guy, people are calling for a beheading in the town square.

I'm not sure how much of the outrage is out of genuine concern for the victim & that the sentence was too light and how much is because we love seeing the rich white college athlete fall from grace. We idolize celebrity and the wealthy and then rejoice when they mess up.

I'm not defending the guy, I'm just not impressed with the memes and all that. I agree with the earlier post about this judge having a history of really light sentences for sex crimes. That should be the focus it seems, but instead my Facebook is just filled with people posting his picture with "he's a rapist!" captions.

Chris22

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3770
  • Location: Chicago NW Suburbs
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #33 on: June 09, 2016, 03:14:00 PM »
I think it's interesting that the people who seem most upset by this case are the young/feminist/social justice types. The same people who when it's black people going to jail for whatever, the story is they need to be rehabilitated and society needs to stop being so heavy handed. But with this guy, people are calling for a beheading in the town square.

I'm not sure how much of the outrage is out of genuine concern for the victim & that the sentence was too light and how much is because we love seeing the rich white college athlete fall from grace. We idolize celebrity and the wealthy and then rejoice when they mess up.

I'm not defending the guy, I'm just not impressed with the memes and all that. I agree with the earlier post about this judge having a history of really light sentences for sex crimes. That should be the focus it seems, but instead my Facebook is just filled with people posting his picture with "he's a rapist!" captions.

You know who has to love him the most?  The parents of that kid who fell in the gorilla cage. 

randymarsh

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1369
  • Location: Denver
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #34 on: June 09, 2016, 03:19:48 PM »
I think it's interesting that the people who seem most upset by this case are the young/feminist/social justice types. The same people who when it's black people going to jail for whatever, the story is they need to be rehabilitated and society needs to stop being so heavy handed. But with this guy, people are calling for a beheading in the town square.

I'm not sure how much of the outrage is out of genuine concern for the victim & that the sentence was too light and how much is because we love seeing the rich white college athlete fall from grace. We idolize celebrity and the wealthy and then rejoice when they mess up.

I'm not defending the guy, I'm just not impressed with the memes and all that. I agree with the earlier post about this judge having a history of really light sentences for sex crimes. That should be the focus it seems, but instead my Facebook is just filled with people posting his picture with "he's a rapist!" captions.

You know who has to love him the most?  The parents of that kid who fell in the gorilla cage.

+1. The Internet masses have a short attention span and they've moved onto the next target.

randymarsh

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1369
  • Location: Denver
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #35 on: June 09, 2016, 03:24:15 PM »
Just realized I went to school about 20 minutes away from where he grew up! Weird.

SwordGuy

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8964
  • Location: Fayetteville, NC
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #36 on: June 09, 2016, 04:31:12 PM »
I think it's interesting that the people who seem most upset by this case are the young/feminist/social justice types. The same people who when it's black people going to jail for whatever, the story is they need to be rehabilitated and society needs to stop being so heavy handed. But with this guy, people are calling for a beheading in the town square.

I'm white, male, think too many ardent feminists are lacking in even basic logic skills, and believe that people should be responsible for their actions.

Which, by the way, is why the rapist should be in PRISON not JAIL, and should be there for YEARS not MONTHS.

We're mad because 6 months, which really means 3 or 4 after discounts for good behavior, is a ludicrously light sentence for the crime.   We're mad because we know that without being from a rich family, or a good athlete or being some other "important" personage, our asses would be in prison for a decade or more for the same crime.


RetiredAt63

  • CMTO 2023 Attendees
  • Senior Mustachian
  • *
  • Posts: 20798
  • Location: Eastern Ontario, Canada
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #37 on: June 09, 2016, 04:56:16 PM »
Well, I'm an old white feminist, and I had hoped things would have improved in the last 40 years.  Nope.

The only good news in this whole sorry mess is that he did not have time to get to vaginal penetration, so she doesn't have to worry about pregnancy or STDs.  If the cyclists hadn't come along? 

To me a fair bit of it isn't race, it is the young handsome jock hero who can have whatever he wants theme.  I remember years ago there was a story about a juniour hockey player (this was in Canada, where hockey is super major) whose team lost a major playoff game.  He took his girlfriend to a remote parking spot and beat her up, badly, to take his temper out on someone who couldn't protect herself.  Same sense of entitlement, just the action was different.

doggyfizzle

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 380
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #38 on: June 09, 2016, 05:23:05 PM »
I'm not sure how much of the outrage is out of genuine concern for the victim & that the sentence was too light and how much is because we love seeing the rich white college athlete fall from grace. We idolize celebrity and the wealthy and then rejoice when they mess up.

I've actually wondered (but haven't looked into it) if the prosecution in this case took the "make an example out of the white privileged male" route in an attempt for harsh sentence and that may have influenced the judge's leniency?  Maybe the judge thought about the Duke Lacrosse case from a couple years ago and was overly cautious or something when sentencing this kid after he was found guilty?

2buttons

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 393
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #39 on: June 09, 2016, 05:30:30 PM »
Young female teacher rapes underage hs boy.  What happens?

I have two boys.  They will one day go to college. They will one day potentially be at a party.  There is one day that they maybe drinking with other women and they all may have too much to drink. I will need to raise them right, but also teach them to protect themselves at all times as others have noted.

I am so conflicted in this case.  Brock admits he touched her inappropriately, but they were also making out on the dance floor, and as much as people like to vilify fraternities, odds are he did not drag her out of the house without someone noticing. Where was her sister? Where were the other girls that were with her sharing the bottle of Vodka? Do we know? Now did he drag her behind the dumpster? Where is the dumpster? We are talking mainstream media reporting. Does behind the dumpster mean the parking lot near the dumpsters? The swedes were biking by and saw them, so they couldn't have been that secluded by the dumpster - so we don't know.  We need an image of the crime scene to be sure. We need more details and answers.

Duke Lacrosse, UVA fraternity - both make me more cynical. If I was a women, would I feel entirely differently? I am sure I would. If I had girls rather than boys, would I feel differently, I am sure I would.

Could she have consented, blacked out, passed out, and then the minute she passed out was when the Swedes arrived and Brock just didn't realize it because he was hammered and they were being intimate? Is that possible? I don't think you can rule it out, but maybe the jurors did. We need more facts.

She also thanked "activists" in her letter. Does that mean someone got their claws into her and make her shift from a position of "I don't want him to rot in jail" to "He should be behind bars forever and he is the most evil person in the world?" I don't know the answers to these questions, and that makes me conflicted. 

I am also old school, think men should be chivalrous and keep women safe at all times.  So if he is a predator, it makes me sick.

The judge, from what I read, is well respected by a number of colleagues. I think the probation officer on the other hand who recommended the light sentence may be worth questioning again. Did he twist her words?  What made him get the impression from the interviews to give such a lenient recommendation. Someone needs to interview the interviewer.

I honestly just don't know what to make of this case. The one thing I know is that regardless of what actually happened, two young people's lives, if not more, are completely ruined for the rest of their lives. 

Additionally, I knew this would be a contentious thread, but I hope that you all steer clear of personally attacking each other regardless if you think another person is wrong, because this case should at least show us that we need to be smarter people and kinder to one another. 
« Last Edit: June 09, 2016, 05:37:42 PM by 2buttons »

randymarsh

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1369
  • Location: Denver
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #40 on: June 09, 2016, 05:59:30 PM »
I'm not sure how much of the outrage is out of genuine concern for the victim & that the sentence was too light and how much is because we love seeing the rich white college athlete fall from grace. We idolize celebrity and the wealthy and then rejoice when they mess up.

I've actually wondered (but haven't looked into it) if the prosecution in this case took the "make an example out of the white privileged male" route in an attempt for harsh sentence and that may have influenced the judge's leniency?  Maybe the judge thought about the Duke Lacrosse case from a couple years ago and was overly cautious or something when sentencing this kid after he was found guilty?

I'm reading the prosecution asked for 6 years and the absolute max was 14 years.

We're in a time where people are protesting about over incarceration and mandatory minimums. A judge then takes into consideration the age of the guilty and lack of criminal record and...people are pissed.

This article suggests that's the sentence is inline with norms from the county probation department: http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_29985256/stanford-sexual-assault-case-judge-behind-sentence


Cyaphas

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Age: 41
  • Location: DFW, TX
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #41 on: June 09, 2016, 06:13:08 PM »

He is absolutely going to be raped there, over and over.


Is it cognitive dissonance that 'victim blaming' is seen as a horrific thing with Brock at the dumpster, yet when he's raped in prison the same people point out, 'But that's prison?'

The overwhelming majority of rape occurs every night to men all across the country in prisons and it occasionally makes the news... Zero outrage. What a strange world we live in.

Cyaphas

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Age: 41
  • Location: DFW, TX
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #42 on: June 09, 2016, 06:32:06 PM »

I think it's interesting that the people who seem most upset by this case are the young/feminist/social justice types. The same people who when it's black people going to jail for whatever, the story is they need to be rehabilitated and society needs to stop being so heavy handed. But with this guy, people are calling for a beheading in the town square.


Theres an interesting point. What were the sentences handed down to all of those gang rapists at that prom a few years ago?

randymarsh

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1369
  • Location: Denver
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #43 on: June 09, 2016, 06:52:29 PM »

I think it's interesting that the people who seem most upset by this case are the young/feminist/social justice types. The same people who when it's black people going to jail for whatever, the story is they need to be rehabilitated and society needs to stop being so heavy handed. But with this guy, people are calling for a beheading in the town square.


Theres an interesting point. What were the sentences handed down to all of those gang rapists at that prom a few years ago?

This one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Richmond_High_School_gang_rape

32 years but the situations are hardly comparable, other than both being sexual assaults.

Cyaphas

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Age: 41
  • Location: DFW, TX
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #44 on: June 09, 2016, 06:58:39 PM »

I think it's interesting that the people who seem most upset by this case are the young/feminist/social justice types. The same people who when it's black people going to jail for whatever, the story is they need to be rehabilitated and society needs to stop being so heavy handed. But with this guy, people are calling for a beheading in the town square.


Theres an interesting point. What were the sentences handed down to all of those gang rapists at that prom a few years ago?

This one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Richmond_High_School_gang_rape

32 years but the situations are hardly comparable, other than both being sexual assaults.

I was setting myself up to be seriously upset if they were under sentenced. But, they weren't. I mean... we're not allowed to shoot em.

It's not even remotely comparable to this, but it had just occurred to me that I didn't ever remember hearing anything about it past the initial shock reporting. I was looking while you were posting. It's ahrd to imgine it's been 7 years. I'm not finding anything on the other assailant's sentences. Either way, OT. Sorry.

golden1

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Location: MA
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #45 on: June 09, 2016, 07:29:40 PM »
Rape is horrific no matter who it happens to and no one deserves to be violated. 

rockstache

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 7270
  • Age: 11
  • Location: Southeast
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #46 on: June 09, 2016, 07:31:10 PM »
Young female teacher rapes underage hs boy.  What happens?

They go to jail. I can think of at least 3 cases of that in the last few years off the top of my head. Was that rhetorical?

EMP

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 344
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #47 on: June 09, 2016, 08:04:05 PM »
[quote author=TheOldestYoungMan link=topic=57155.msg1113900#msg1113900
The overwhelming majority of rape occurs every night to men all across the country in prisons and it occasionally makes the news... Zero outrage. What a strange world we live in.

This is a bold claim.

Chris22

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3770
  • Location: Chicago NW Suburbs
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #48 on: June 09, 2016, 08:26:23 PM »
[quote author=TheOldestYoungMan link=topic=57155.msg1113900#msg1113900
The overwhelming majority of rape occurs every night to men all across the country in prisons and it occasionally makes the news... Zero outrage. What a strange world we live in.

This is a bold claim.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2449454/More-men-raped-US-women-including-prison-sexual-abuse.html

randymarsh

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1369
  • Location: Denver
Re: Brock Turner
« Reply #49 on: June 09, 2016, 08:43:54 PM »
[quote author=TheOldestYoungMan link=topic=57155.msg1113900#msg1113900
The overwhelming majority of rape occurs every night to men all across the country in prisons and it occasionally makes the news... Zero outrage. What a strange world we live in.

This is a bold claim.

I'm not sure there's data to support "overwhelming majority", but rape in the general population is much closer to 50/50 then people seem willing to admit.

This article's (http://time.com/3393442/cdc-rape-numbers/) key quote:

Quote
And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011).

In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC finding: that women rape men as often as men rape women.

This piece references survey data from prisoners: http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2014/04/male_rape_in_america_a_new_study_reveals_that_men_are_sexually_assaulted.html

Quote
Women were more likely to be abused by fellow female inmates, and men by guards, and many of those guards were female. For example, of juveniles reporting staff sexual misconduct, 89 percent were boys reporting abuse by a female staff member.