Nope. I think those people on Fox are fringe. Just because they are part of a major news organization does not change that. I have been very consistent in my view that only the fringe supports violence while you seem to want to assign all sorts of motives to me without evidence. Your mention of the Berkeley Newspaper is not a logical argument just like me claiming Sean Hannity represents all conservatives is not a logical argument, although my example certainly resides closer to the mainstream that yours, but as you say, he is also more careful with his words because he is a professional. I brought up Fox News not because I think the right is worse, but to illustrate how silly it is to use those sorts of examples. You are being willfully obtuse here.
Fox has mainstream journalists with millions of viewers, and in that sense it is not fringe. Fox reporters also have not supported violence in the way these Berkeley student reporters have.
I don't see that I've assigned any motives to you at all. You think that the student newspaper at the most prestigious public university in America is a fringe publication. I think it is not fringe, but that it's a mainstream source with important professional connections to even more widely respected media.
Obviously I don't think that the idiots who wrote and published these editorials represent all leftists. Where did I say such a thing? I've said that I'm trying to get you guys on the left who still have a sensible view to see that a specific problem is emerging on your side.
I didn't say that he was more careful with his words. You did. I didn't say that; rather, I said that the example he was addressing was relevantly different than the violence at the Milo event at UCB.
Pretty rich that you're calling me obtuse when you aren't reading what I wrote. Where we disagree at this point is that you think that the UCB newspaper is the equivalent of a right-wing self-published paper by some KKK members. I don't think that. I think the UCB paper is an important media outlet, as I have explained. If I'm right, then it's a good piece of evidence that a problem is emerging on the left. That's the issue I'm trying to address.
As I said in my last post, there are problems about the rhetoric coming from Trump. That is an emerging problem on the right, and deserves attention from those of us on the right. I'm trying to argue that a problem is also emerging specifically on the left--a problem about a sudden sympathy for violent political resistance.
Feel free to disagree with me, but stop acting like I am not on topic, or that I'm offering irrelevant evidence, or something like that. And try reading what I wrote.
As for the pepper spray incident, does it matter if the police were being surrounded by protesters and not allowed to leave? And how should they have removed the law-breaking protesters from the premises? (Note that I already asked this above.) Maybe you're right that this was a case of political violence. I am not convinced.
You have not provided any example of Milo doxxing or calling for violence, and I haven't been able to find any on my own, either. Some of his fans have behaved that way. I haven't denied that he has said a lot of hurtful things to lots of people. That's not the same as doxxing people or calling for violence, and I don't blame people for the actions of their fans.
Edit added: Also, I read that the cop who sprayed those folks had his career ended. Nobody has paid any price for the violence in UCB, and there has been no outcry against the UCB student paper as far as I can tell. That's obviously an important difference, insofar as I would not have any problem if there was a condemnation of the UCB editors for publishing that crap.