I see where you guys are coming from and I agree that many and perhaps most people would find some way to piss away even a $2MM windfall. But this entire little exercise of "come up with the best plan for this money" seems a little pointless if we're not even allowed to assume that we're capable of implementing the plan.
To the extent that the "wealth advisor" in the article really did mean to say "most people just squander it anyway so it's pointless for me even to try, so I'm telling them not to quit their day jobs," I suppose I would sigh and grudgingly admit his wisdom. But that doesn't seem to be in the spirit of the thought experiment. Maybe I'm misreading, but I interpreted him to mean something closer to "$80,000 a year isn't enough to live," which is idiotic and richly deserving of ridicule and an honored place in AMWOSAC (Anti-Mustachian Wall Of Shame And Comedy).