The Money Mustache Community
Mustachian Community => Mustachian Book Club => Topic started by: bender on February 25, 2018, 08:26:06 PM
-
I'm currently reading Enlightenment Now. I think others on this forum would enjoy it. Great read that should turn anyone into an optimist.
The 'Wealth' chapter has a surprising defense of capitalism as one of the main drivers of progress in the last 200 years.
The concept of entropy is also explained quite well.
-
I have not read Enlightenment Now, but I will need to. I am surprised you have had no replies.
As I understand it, Pinker shows that the condition of life is improving because the world is becoming more enlightened, following the outlook of eighteenth century Enlightenment thinkers who emphasis reason and analysis over ignorance and bigotry.
I agree that the world is improving, but what happens if people do not want to be enlightened? The most spectacular example of this attitude is Islamic State, which is ignorant, irrational and destructive as policy. Being ignorant, irrational and destructive is a way of life for them. I am sure all of us can think of people who are ignorant and irrational as a way of life.
Over the last sixty or so years, the Big Three topics are: Automation, Population Growth and Sustainable Energy. All these matters depend on understanding the science behind them. An automated economy allows us a life of leisure, so is an opportunity, not a threat. We cannot have indefinite population growth in a finite world. We cannot rely indefinitely on finite reserves of fossil fuels, particularly as carbon dioxide makes the world warmer. How many people want to understand the maths and science behind these matters?
-
Interesting, I may add that to my ever growing list of books to read!
-
I read The Better Angles of our Nature. Had mixed feelings about it. The basic premise - that the world has been growing more peaceful - is awesome and gives me hope. But like all authors, he has his biases. In his case, he is a Jewish atheist baby boomer, and he places unnecessary emphasis in those areas.
-
The enlightenment is at its core embracing science and reason. It is the rejection of tradition. That includes many ideas held by faith based religions. The US revolution and constitution are heavily influenced by the enlightenment.
Pinker supports the idea that moving beyond faith and tradition to reason, science and humanism is driving progress.
Population growth, automation and sustainable energy are all addressed in detail.
He rejects the idea of going back to simpler times and points out that in our nostalgia, we forget about the horrible things we've overcome like polio, famine and even war (comparatively). The data is really indisputable here.
A couple of more great points I've learned so far:
Organic farming is unsustainable. That is counter intuitive but the book explains it quite well. Organic farming takes many more times the amount of land and natural resources compared to using technologies like fertilizer, engineered seeds, hydroponics, etc. The argument is that all agriculture is human engineered. All our crops have been selectively bred to increase yield, reduce water needs, pest resistance, etc. What makes anyone believe that the technology we had 30 or 50 years ago is the right level and we should stop there. Advances in agriculture is what is feeding the world right now. Data shows that technological advances have allowed us to reduce the amount of land dedicated to farms. This leads to forrests reclaiming farmland that's no longer needed.
Pinker states that what we know of 'environmentalism' is actually holding us back. Ecomodernism shows how advancing technology can be used to solve environmental issues. For example moving from burning wood to coal to oil to natural gas for energy is a huge factor in reducing pollution. Cities allow for high efficiency with dense populations, less energy used for heat and transportation. There is a pretty strong call for nuclear power to take over, with some optimism that fusion may actually be for real in the near future.
I'm sure my paraphrased arguments have holes, but Pinker doesn't leave many in his near 500 page manifesto. It can get wordy at times, but I'm digesting and learning a lot from it. The facts used to back up each concept are compelling.
-
I have bought a Kindle version of Enlightenment now, and am about half way through, a long read. He has a sharp mind, and can sum up ideas succinctly. He has, INMO, blind spots about automation and population, mainly because he seems not to see the longer term Enlightenment implications of automation and controlling population. He contrasts Enlightenment thinkers and Counter Enlightenment thinkers, something which needed doing.
I may have to buy a paper version so I can annotate, something I hardly ever do. Excellent book. If you cannot borrow it from the local library, buy a Kindle version. It is that sort of book
-
I just finished this book yesterday and sat stunned for about 15 minutes afterwards by the elegance of his conclusion. This is easily one of the best books I've ever read, and while not directly applicable to my daily life the overall sense of optimism and gratitude is priceless.
Some of the sections are better than others, and while he accurately describes the problem of partisanship of today doesn't have a good solution to it yet. But maybe understanding it is the first step.
Doing a book club at work on this now.
-
I was able to hear Pinker speak (for free!) at my alma mater. I am currently on the waitlist from the library for the audiobook version from the library.
-
Just started this one. So far I love it, thanks for the recommendation!
-
I'm almost done with this book and I came here to start a thread about it if one didn't exist already. This seems like a classic Mustachian book, and I'm surprised it has not gotten more attention here! Perhaps because it's not a financial book? ;)
One of the best books I've read in a while. I am going to start using his term and refer to myself as a "serious possibilist". I especially enjoyed his chapters on income inequality and the environment.
-
This is a very good book. It's easy to be critical and pessimistic in a world where misinformation, negativity and sensationalism is the norm. It's nice to hear a positive and objective look at our progress over the past 200 yrs. I still believe that the author is overly optimistic about our ability to solve the issues we are creating with uncontrolled population growth. I would easily recommended this book.
BJ
-
Listened to it on audiotape. Liked it so much I put it on my "real" reading list!
-
I just read this a little while ago. It is very impressive.
I have to say, though, that he chooses to "frame" some of his arguments in an unnecessarily aggressive way. I wouldn't argue with (most of) his conclusions, but it seems set up to offend in more than a few places. I know Pinker gets a lot of flack from both left and right, so I can understand him being somewhat defensive. However, I worry that he may have lost some of his potential audience with the "knives out" approach.
Beyond that, it is well worth reading.
-
New to this forum, but wanted to jump in and say I picked up this book because of this thread.
I am closing in on half way and have a couple of thoughts. First, there are whole sections where I think he brushes over the most salient points. For example: wealth inequality. One of the big negatives of wealth inequality is that it actually inhibits progress. While he does mention this briefly, I think it deserves more "air-time".
His chapter on climate change seemed like it was aimed at some very particular people that the majority of the U.S. has no experience with. I have no doubt that as a Harvard professor he communicates regularly with people who think the earth should be saved at the expense of humanity... but I don't really think that is a common belief. I'm from the Portland area, and that viewpoint would be considered relatively extreme even here. In short, I think he uses his argumentative style and straw-men to motivate the reader and it isn't really necessary.
I also am not a huge fan of his writing style. He has a tendency for rambling, long-winded, garrulous, and wandering lists (see what I did there?). He also self-references chapters too much. I think if got rid of both of these tendencies the book would be 30% shorter.
All that being said, I would whole-heartedly recommend it so far. He really has made me think a lot, and does a really good job of putting human progress in perspective.
-
" book would be 30% shorter."
Agreed I think most books I read would suffer no harm from being
30% shorter!