Author Topic: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?  (Read 8157 times)

cats

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1232
swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« on: December 05, 2016, 02:42:41 PM »
We have a 9-month old baby and I have been considering enrolling him in some swim lessons sometime in the next year.  However, they are...kind of pricey (pools I have looked at in our area seem to charge around $25/lesson, there are also unlimited monthly pass options on the order of $80/month...not sure these are worth it as the maximum I think we could manage timewise right now is 1x/week).  While we definitely want our kid to be able to do basic swimming, my husband did question whether or not there is really any value to swim lessons at age 12-18 mos (my initial research indicates that waitlists are common around here so anticipating it would be a few months before we even had the option of blowing money on classes).  So...wondering if anyone on here with slightly older (or even much older) kids has insight on whether or not swim lessons at this age are "worth it"?  Do you find you really need to be going at a certain minimum frequency or length of time to get any benefit? For clarity, I have no illusions that I've spawned the next Michael Phelps, but I think it's very important to be comfortable in the water and know how to swim (I got unexpectedly pushed off a dock once as a kid).  At the same time, I don't want to blow hundreds of dollars on lessons next year if the reality is he could just as easily start at age 2 or 3.

At this point, the thoughts I have in favor are:

-starting young gets baby comfortable with the pool, maybe with putting his face in the water or having some general sense of how to float
-baby gets to work off some energy on the weekends (we have a small apartment and as he gets more mobile this is more and more on my mind...we will of course make use of free local parks also)
-good for me/my husband as it gets swimming on our radar and we are less likely to find we've left it "too late" and now have a child who is terrified of the pool on our hands
-enjoyable activity for me or my husband to do with the baby (I love the water)

englishteacheralex

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4331
  • Age: 45
  • Location: Honolulu, HI
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2016, 03:01:50 PM »
We found a free swimming class for our (at that time) 18 month old through the parks/rec department. It was pretty basic; just getting used to the water kind of stuff. Seeing the other kids doing things like jump off the side of the pool into Daddy's arms emboldened our toddler. It also gave us some ideas for how to play with him in the water--dunking his face in, putting his ears in, different games, etc.

It was the exact same routine for six classes in a row, which actually worked pretty well because by the end he was really comfortable with all the skills. I think I would have paid about $60-$100 for such a class, but was really happy with it being offered for free. Our child really enjoyed himself and it was a fun thing for my husband to do with him.

TrMama

  • Guest
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2016, 03:44:42 PM »
At that age, the lessons are strictly for the parents benefit. All you really need to do is to take your kid to the pool. You don't need a lesson for that.

I never did the baby lessons with my kids, just took them swimming. We started with lessons when they were 4. I think that was a good age, possibly even a bit young.

MDM

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 11693
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2016, 03:56:38 PM »
At that age, the lessons are strictly for the parents benefit. All you really need to do is to take your kid to the pool. You don't need a lesson for that.

I never did the baby lessons with my kids, just took them swimming. We started with lessons when they were 4. I think that was a good age, possibly even a bit young.
+1

At 9 months old, your bathtub - with continuous parental supervision - is more than big enough.

englishteacheralex

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4331
  • Age: 45
  • Location: Honolulu, HI
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2016, 04:17:11 PM »
Yeah, so here's the thing--it's a fun treat, not a need. For us, it was a fun treat that we were able to get for free, but that I probably would have paid a little money for.

Do you NEED swim lessons for babies? Probably not, although I've seen these very expensive ones that apparently teach babies to float if they fall in a pool. Those seem like they could be a good idea/need, if they actually work.

 But are basic swimming lessons for babies enjoyable? We found them to be a blast. Kind of like Gymboree classes--let's not kid ourselves, it's not like taking a baby to these classes is going to lead to different outcomes in life; they're just a fun way to interact with other kids and parents. Worth $80/month? I don't know, depends on your priorities, I guess. I'm too cheap for baby classes like that, but I can definitely see the appeal.

cats

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1232
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2016, 04:17:38 PM »
Okay, so...Q2: do the lessons provide any tips for parents on keeping kids safe in the pool?  I admit part of me is a bit scared I will let go for a minute and my kid will sink like a stone and drown because I don't "know" what to do with a baby in a pool!  I guess just start out in a baby pool and go from there...?

englishteacheralex

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4331
  • Age: 45
  • Location: Honolulu, HI
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2016, 04:22:45 PM »
The free ones we took had a skill they taught where the babies would get to the side of the pool and cling there, edging their way to the ladders. I scoffed at it, but after six lessons my son got pretty good at kicking his way over to the wall from a VERY short distance and then clinging on to the wall without any help for quite some time, shuffling his hands to make his way to the steps.

The routine was he would jump from the side into Daddy's arms, Daddy would let him drop all the way under the surface, and then he'd kick over to the wall to cling/shuffle.

If he fell in, it's conceivable that he would be able to do it on his own, but I'd be pretty shocked. I watch him like a hawk when we're around a pool, even with the little training he got.

cats

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1232
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2016, 04:33:20 PM »
Cool, thanks.  I think I'm leaning towards taking a lesson or two this spring (for myself, heh), then planning to visit the nearby public pool semi-regularly this summer for some more general splashing around.

It seems pretty common for pools around here to require supervision for kids under age 6, so yes, I will plan to be with him/watching him for a while no matter how many lessons we get :)

KS

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 208
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #8 on: December 05, 2016, 04:38:06 PM »
Following, as I've been considering this as well! My parents live locally and have a pool so we got to do some "swimming" for free over the summer (baby LOVED it btw) but it's outdoors and not heated, so if we want to make sure she doesn't get scared of it by next summer when she'll be nearly 2 we'd need to find classes or at least a warmer option of where to take her.

Safety-wise, we were mostly just super careful with her, but also my mom got her something like this which seemed to make her feel extra at home in the water (maybe since the seat is similar to her jumperoo?) https://www.amazon.com/SwimWays-Baby-Spring-Float-Canopy/dp/B00253T7R2/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1480980884&sr=8-2

I feel your pain on the need for energy burning when living in a small place, especially now that ours can walk I'm feeling badly about the days she gets cooped up in our little living room most of the day!

cats

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1232
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #9 on: December 05, 2016, 04:45:19 PM »

I feel your pain on the need for energy burning when living in a small place, especially now that ours can walk I'm feeling badly about the days she gets cooped up in our little living room most of the day!

Yes, ours is on the brink of walking and I've definitely been working at figuring out things for us to do on the weekends once that full level of mobility hits.  He already is in pretty much constant motion when he's awake.  Fortunately we have several parks with swings and play structures less than a mile from our house so I think those are going to be getting regular visits in the coming months!

TrMama

  • Guest
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2016, 04:48:32 PM »
Okay, so...Q2: do the lessons provide any tips for parents on keeping kids safe in the pool?  I admit part of me is a bit scared I will let go for a minute and my kid will sink like a stone and drown because I don't "know" what to do with a baby in a pool!  I guess just start out in a baby pool and go from there...?

Can they teach your child something? Probably. Will it be enough for you to be able to safely let go of the baby? Never. The only way to keep your baby safe in the water is to be holding him at all times. Or you can put him in some sort of flotation device that's within arms reach, at all times.

Unfortunately, there's no swimming lesson that results in you being able to toss the baby in the pool and then go for an umbrella drink ;-)

Also, exposure to water when the baby is young does not guarantee that he won't become afraid of the water, or pool, later. Ask me how I know . . .

tonysemail

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 717
  • Location: San Jose, CA
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #11 on: December 05, 2016, 04:49:28 PM »
we started our kids when they were old enough to attend group swim lessons.
It was probably around age 4.
for us, there was a week of panic and terrible tantrums, which slowly progressed to good participation.
I've seen other kids that scream their heads off for many weeks.
I wouldn't worry too much about it because swim teachers are *very* experienced at coaxing reluctant kids to participate.
it just becomes another challenge to overcome and a good opportunity to practice those parenting skills.

We had a close call in the pool with my daughter when she was around 5.
I exercised poor judgement when someone asked me for help with moving some party food.
I walked away for a minute and she got into trouble.
It shocked me how bang-bang fast it was.
But even with that experience, I wouldn't go for baby swim lessons.
just watch them carefully and don't allow yourself to be distracted.

cats

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1232
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #12 on: December 05, 2016, 04:49:41 PM »
Unfortunately, there's no swimming lesson that results in you being able to toss the baby in the pool and then go for an umbrella drink ;-)

ARGH!

mm1970

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 11949
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #13 on: December 05, 2016, 05:57:49 PM »
Meh, so I've taken my kids (now 10 and 4) to a variety of swim lessons.  Some worked, some didn't.  For my older son, nothing really "took" till age 6.

For my younger son, I sat in on a lesson with a friend.  It was a different place, where they start as babies.  She has twins, her husband couldn't make it, so she needed a second adult.  I was incredibly impressed with what her 2 year olds were doing in the water, so a few weeks later I signed up my 3 year old.

He has come very far in a year.  I suspect that he's well on his way to being able to actually swim and not drown LONG before his big brother was.  That makes me feel much better.  I'm also really impressed with what the babies can do.

But anyway...what is your lifestyle?  The parents who do this here have money, generally.  They like it.  It's approx $30 per half hour (a session is 9 weeks long, and they run $200-$250).  However, we live on the coast, in a warm place, with lots of beaches.  It's way more important to me to have my kids be able to swim than it mattered for me as a kid living in the woods.  We never went to a lake or a river. 

Then again, I regret not being able to swim until I was 40.

frugal rph

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 77
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #14 on: December 05, 2016, 06:26:02 PM »
I took my son to swimming lessons around 1 year old at the YMCA. The instructor was brand new and did not appear to have much experience being around kids in or out of the water. We stopped going after 3 classes.  After that, I waited until he was 3 to try again. This instructor came highly recommended and did a great job.

bogart

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #15 on: December 05, 2016, 08:39:59 PM »
We are fortunate that our pool has a really kid-friendly (partly design -- it's fully accessible so has a huge long ramp that is part of the pool, can pick any depth of water you/kid like to be in from 1" to 8' -- and partly management -- great lifeguards who are on their game but also allow kids to be playful) indoor pool.  From when DS was about 18 months (which is when it opened), we probably went 2 or 3 times a week and spent 30 minutes to an hour in the pool (basically however long DS wanted to be there).  With a kid who's mobile and energetic ... an indoor pool (or an outdoor pool at the right time of year) is a wonderful, wonderful thing.

We didn't do lessons (then), I just stayed with him.  Basically, we just enjoyed hanging out in the water and I tried to teach him what I'd been taught, which was mostly about putting my mouth/nose in the water and blowing bubbles (first step to learning how to put head underwater -- blowing bubbles helps kid keep water out of nose).  Keeping them safe doesn't require lots of technical skills, watch them, and if their heads go underwater, fish them out (not the whole kid, but the head) immediately, and apply appropriate parenting -- could be soothing, could be bouncing/distracting depending on the kid.  By 3, my kid had worked out how to swim (a tiny bit) independently, i.e., keep his head above water for a few instants, basically just from feeling what worked in the water.  Over time, those skills got better (i.e. he practiced and learned how to do this). 

We later did lessons, a few private ones and then one set of public group which were not good (not a condemnation of the concept, we got an instructor who didn't have the skills to manage/teach a group of ~5-year olds), and subsequently some more private, some of which were shared/group.  I'd like to resume those, actually, because while DS is a competent swimmer he's now finally old/coordinated enough (almost 10) that I think he could "get" the strokes -- his earlier lessons he learned the basic moves and can apply them, but not confidently/efficiently (though his ability to get from one place to another and to stay afloat are fine). 

Anyway, I don't think there's anything wrong with lessons, assuming kid-instructor-setup are a good match, but I also don't think there's any real need for them at an early age (I do think they're worthwhile once a kid's old enough to learn strokes).

Honestly, I'd recommend just taking your kid to the pool and trying it out.  If you're uncomfortable, you can leave.  If you're comfortable(-ish), you can stay and hang out and see what works for you.  You can also watch how other parents/kids do stuff and that will give you ideas, and you may be able to get a sense of what the lesson options at the pool you're using are (I mean, really see the instructors and get a sense of who's good with what ages and such) and make a more informed decision about what, if any, lessons you want to pursue.

LiveLean

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 899
  • Location: Central Florida
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #16 on: December 06, 2016, 11:53:25 AM »
At 6 months, it's not really lessons but I took our oldest to such a program and found it useful.

More importantly is to put your kids in a summer pool team at the age of 6. They'll learn proper swimming, not "survival swimming" as many of us Gen X parents did -- the type of swimming where you're not going to drown but you'd never be able to swim a quarter of a mile in open water if you're life depended on it. Our guys had at-home swim lessons -- we live in Florida and had an instructor come to the house to teach ours and some neighbor kids -- but you really need a few months of focused swimming for it to be lasting. The summer pool team provided it and led our guys into competitive year-round swimming. But even if they'd only done a summer pool team for a year or two, they'd be far better off than 90 percent of kids.

Guesl982374

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 498
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #17 on: December 06, 2016, 12:45:57 PM »
We personally did not sign up the little guy for swim 'lessons' at that age. He's now 14 mo and we've taken him into the Ocean and my parents pool multiple times over the past summer. We got something like this and he's loved playing in the water.

https://www.amazon.com/SwimWays-Baby-Spring-Float-Canopy/dp/B00253T7R2/ref=zg_bs_1272923011_2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=0WCN3DP4BT48Q5R87MSV

gooki

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2917
  • Location: NZ
    • My FIRE journal
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #18 on: December 08, 2016, 01:29:25 AM »
What worked well for our daughter. No lessons until 5 years old, but a plenty of trips to the pool every year just to have fun splashing around. The main goal was to have fun and get her comfortable having her head under water.

Then when she started lessons, we enrolled in a course that is 5 days a week instead of 1 day a week. The progress from just one week of lessons was astounding. After two weeks she can effectively be left alone swimming in the kids pool (1.05 meters deep). We keep an eye on her, but no need to be within arms reach.

So for two weeks of lessons ($130), we've got a kid that can swim as well as one that has had $900 spent on lessons over the last three years.

brycedoula

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 103
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #19 on: December 08, 2016, 08:21:01 AM »
My daughter (10 months) & I just finished 8 weeks of "lessons" @ our local city-run pool.  It was $50 for eight 1/2-hour classes, which I feel was a very reasonable price.

As a "Starfish" [children aged 6-36 months] there wasn't any swimming involved but lots of splashing, singing & dunking. My kid LOVED it, but two older kids in the class basically screamed the whole time.

Are lessons useful at this age? I say no. Were they an inexpensive & fun thing to do with my baby 1x/week, encouraging me to get out of the house & get a good arm workout? Absolutely!

If you do decide to spring for lessons - another cost will be swim diapers, either reusable or cloth. Swim diapers don't absorb any liquids the way regular diapers do, but are meant to contain any *ahem* solids that might get passed.

Secretly Saving

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 418
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #20 on: December 08, 2016, 09:18:57 AM »
If you live in an area where pools are prevalent, I think that ALL children should have survival swim skills.  The earlier the better!  I am always so saddened to hear about a drowning death that could have been prevented.

GizmoTX

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1450
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #21 on: December 08, 2016, 02:34:33 PM »
It's very high priority for us because we live in an area with lots of ponds, retention ponds, residential pools, etc. so the lessons we're looking for are more of the "don't drown" type, which are offered by Infant Swim Resource (videos at link to give you an idea of what is taught).

Meerkat, we had our son do Infant Swim Resource starting in 1995 when he was 18 months old. At that age, he was still mostly non-verbal & had daily lessons no longer than 5 minutes. We did ISR instead of the typical 'classes' that frankly make water a very dangerous attraction. I personally saw a 2 year old slip to the bottom of a 2' pool & make no move to get up, just waited to be rescued while terrified -- of course his mom grabbed him immediately but the issue is that a kid falling or slipping into water happens quickly, silently, & they don't know what to do unless taught. By 3 weeks our son 'graduated' -- he could get to the steps by himself fully clothed from the middle of the pool. He knew where the air was, how to flip over & float on his back to get the air, & flip again to kick towards the side or steps. We repeated this course every year, switching him to stroke lessons at age 5. He's now 23, loves swimming, boating, & scuba diving.

KS

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 208
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #22 on: December 08, 2016, 03:04:11 PM »
Wow the Infant Swim Resource thing looks really interesting, thanks to those of you who mentioned it! Those videos of the little babies finding the air and floating are pretty impressive... do they still do it in a way that is fun and not too scary for the kid? I will be looking into it more for sure, lots of backyard pools around here and though my parents have a good fence, I know not everywhere does.

kimmarg

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 750
  • Location: Northern New England
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #23 on: December 08, 2016, 06:49:19 PM »
My daughter (10 months) & I just finished 8 weeks of "lessons" @ our local city-run pool.  It was $50 for eight 1/2-hour classes, which I feel was a very reasonable price.

As a "Starfish" [children aged 6-36 months] there wasn't any swimming involved but lots of splashing, singing & dunking. My kid LOVED it, but two older kids in the class basically screamed the whole time.

Are lessons useful at this age? I say no. Were they an inexpensive & fun thing to do with my baby 1x/week, encouraging me to get out of the house & get a good arm workout? Absolutely!

If you do decide to spring for lessons - another cost will be swim diapers, either reusable or cloth. Swim diapers don't absorb any liquids the way regular diapers do, but are meant to contain any *ahem* solids that might get passed.

This was exactly my experience. We took our 6-9 month old for a set of 8 once a week lessons this summer. She loved it (basically the worlds largest bathtub with a bunch of rubber duckies and balls and singing songs). Perhaps just as importantly it gave the at-home parent a chance to leave the house in an environment where a baby would be welcome. 

Kitsune

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1853
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #24 on: December 13, 2016, 06:56:24 PM »
My daughter (10 months) & I just finished 8 weeks of "lessons" @ our local city-run pool.  It was $50 for eight 1/2-hour classes, which I feel was a very reasonable price.

As a "Starfish" [children aged 6-36 months] there wasn't any swimming involved but lots of splashing, singing & dunking. My kid LOVED it, but two older kids in the class basically screamed the whole time.

Are lessons useful at this age? I say no. Were they an inexpensive & fun thing to do with my baby 1x/week, encouraging me to get out of the house & get a good arm workout? Absolutely!

If you do decide to spring for lessons - another cost will be swim diapers, either reusable or cloth. Swim diapers don't absorb any liquids the way regular diapers do, but are meant to contain any *ahem* solids that might get passed.

This was exactly my experience. We took our 6-9 month old for a set of 8 once a week lessons this summer. She loved it (basically the worlds largest bathtub with a bunch of rubber duckies and balls and singing songs). Perhaps just as importantly it gave the at-home parent a chance to leave the house in an environment where a baby would be welcome. 

This, including the price range. Our kid has done 5 "sets" of courses and swims pretty well by herself at 2.5, and she LOVES it, so it was "worth it" for that.

However, the cost of a half-hour class where we are works out to about 7$, so it's actually cheaper than paying for pool access during the "no class" time. At that price, it's worth having a kid who is comfortable in water. At the 25$/class the OP listed, I'd maybe make a different calculation...

nickybecky1

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 479
  • Location: PNW
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #25 on: December 14, 2016, 10:24:26 AM »
Once upon a time I taught these types of classes (parent-child and pre-school age and older group classes). The parent-child classes, the main thing you get out of them, in addition to an activity to get out of the house, is learning some skills as a parent for how to introduce kids to water when you're not in a class to keep things safe for you and for them. For example, how do you teach them to jump in to the water and not grab for your head? If you yourself are a little nervous around the pool, or around the idea of taking your kid to the pool and introducing swimming, the lessons might be more worth it than for parents who are already really confident around swimming and water.

The infant swim resource thing sounds awesome but I didn't have experience with that, so this commentary is just about the original type of parent-child classes. 

If you're trying to teach a kid to blow bubbles under water, when they're able to hum, you can hum songs above water and then dip below the water. You're blowing bubbles!

ehzw

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #26 on: December 19, 2016, 05:10:04 PM »
I haven't used this (yet), but the free videos at http://uswim.com/free-video-lessons/ might give you some ideas for things to do with your kid in the pool without classes.

waltworks

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5873
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #27 on: December 22, 2016, 02:07:30 AM »
Our goal is to make sure our kids get to experience as many athletic/physical activities as possible when they are young, because that's the easiest time to acquire basic skills that will allow a lifetime of enjoyment of a variety of stuff. So our kids both started swimming when they were ~12 months old. They both started skiing/ice skating/riding balance bikes at about 2-2.5, and our older one (4) has now started some very basic team sports (mainly soccer).

If you remember learning it... you probably learned too late. There is *nothing* worse than trying to learn to swim when you are an adult (or ski, or ice skate, or ride a bike...) because adults are just awful at learning stuff. Little kids are *amazing* (both of ours could semi-competently ski after about 45 minutes) at figuring this stuff out and the muscle memory is forever. It's also super fun to help your kids learn new skills, at least for me.

So yes to swimming lessons, but there is no "need" to do it at any particular age. If your kid loves being in the tub and your local pool has inexpensive parent/tot lessons, go give it a shot. If they love it, it can become a family activity (whether in a lesson setting or not) and if they don't, give it a year and try again.

I should mention that M&Ms are a great way to distract a small child from a fall/crash/swallowing a little water.

-W

Harvestqueen

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #28 on: December 25, 2016, 04:51:08 AM »
I started swimming lessons with my son at 4 months.  At that age it was mostly for parents to have a scheduled activity and reason to get out of the house in winter haha.  It was nice to meet parents with babies the same age.  He's now 2 and we have continued with swimming.  I consider it a life skill so feel it is worth the money.  Where we live swimming is very inexpensive...approx $60 per season. 

GilbertB

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 121
  • Age: 48
  • Location: Gent
    • Sci-fi Meandering
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #29 on: December 27, 2016, 08:09:34 AM »
At that age, the lessons are strictly for the parents benefit. All you really need to do is to take your kid to the pool. You don't need a lesson for that.

I never did the baby lessons with my kids, just took them swimming. We started with lessons when they were 4. I think that was a good age, possibly even a bit young.
Same here, not possible to teach her to swim until one hot summer day she decided to go from hating water to loving it...
Classes before would have been a waste.

NewbieFrugalUK

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 55
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #30 on: January 02, 2017, 10:40:30 PM »
Top tip re swim nappies - they can be slid off, rinsed well, and reused! ;)

Txtriathlete

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 53
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #31 on: January 09, 2017, 03:58:55 PM »
No real benefit, either safety or skill wise. Yes a fun activity but sounds a bit pricey in your area. We took our two (now 11 and 13) to the local community pool. Cost like a dollar or two for all afternoon. They had a zero entry play area (like a beach), fun little slides and stuff for the kiddos and we could get them acclimated to the water in a non-threatening way. 

Both kids did take lessons when they were 5 and both were on summer swim leagues from age 5 through 9. I do not recommend going to summer league until your child is able to swim 25 yards/meters without assistance unless the team specifically has a "learn to swim" group.

My daughter quit swimming competitively when she was 10 but still occasionally joins us for a lap workout although she seems to be headed more the bikini route as a teenager (sigh).  My son still swims and is ranked #2 in our state (South Dakota). He wouldn't put his face in the water until he was 5...

I think it's like any activity, what they see mom and dad doing they will want to do (until the teen years, then they go the opposite way!).




Trifle

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6710
  • Age: 58
  • Location: Outside, NC, US
    • In The Garden
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #32 on: January 11, 2017, 06:35:57 AM »
Former lifeguard/children's swim instructor here.  IMO there is no real benefit to lessons that young and it is a fun activity only.  I recall reading a study years ago that looked at outcomes for kids who began organized swimming lessons at various ages, and there was no difference in the kids that had baby "swimming lessons" and the kids that never had a lesson til they were 6 years old.  I can't lay my hands on that one (I think it was from the Red Cross?) but here is a study that reached a similar conclusion:  www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2791436/   

Our kids are 10 and 13.  We put them into organized lessons at about 4 years old, and by the time they were 8 or 9 they were super proficient.  Our daughter swam competitively on summer swim teams until age 12. 

mm1970

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 11949
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #33 on: January 11, 2017, 10:41:52 AM »
Former lifeguard/children's swim instructor here.  IMO there is no real benefit to lessons that young and it is a fun activity only.  I recall reading a study years ago that looked at outcomes for kids who began organized swimming lessons at various ages, and there was no difference in the kids that had baby "swimming lessons" and the kids that never had a lesson til they were 6 years old.  I can't lay my hands on that one (I think it was from the Red Cross?) but here is a study that reached a similar conclusion:  www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2791436/   

Our kids are 10 and 13.  We put them into organized lessons at about 4 years old, and by the time they were 8 or 9 they were super proficient.  Our daughter swam competitively on summer swim teams until age 12.
I can see while that might be the case *generally* (especially for me, as I grew up in the country, no pools/ ponds/ rivers/ deep creeks nearby).

However I live right next to the ocean.  I have to say that my younger son, who started earlier, is MUCH better in the water, at 4.5, than his big brother was.  Big bro wasn't really "safe" in the water until he could stand up in it, at 7 or 8.

One of my friends lived for years on a boat in the harbor with their 2 kids.  You'd better believe they were in baby swim lessons.

Txtriathlete

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 53
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #34 on: January 11, 2017, 10:26:25 PM »
Former lifeguard/children's swim instructor here.  IMO there is no real benefit to lessons that young and it is a fun activity only.  I recall reading a study years ago that looked at outcomes for kids who began organized swimming lessons at various ages, and there was no difference in the kids that had baby "swimming lessons" and the kids that never had a lesson til they were 6 years old.  I can't lay my hands on that one (I think it was from the Red Cross?) but here is a study that reached a similar conclusion:  www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2791436/   

Our kids are 10 and 13.  We put them into organized lessons at about 4 years old, and by the time they were 8 or 9 they were super proficient.  Our daughter swam competitively on summer swim teams until age 12.
I can see while that might be the case *generally* (especially for me, as I grew up in the country, no pools/ ponds/ rivers/ deep creeks nearby).

However I live right next to the ocean.  I have to say that my younger son, who started earlier, is MUCH better in the water, at 4.5, than his big brother was.  Big bro wasn't really "safe" in the water until he could stand up in it, at 7 or 8.

One of my friends lived for years on a boat in the harbor with their 2 kids.  You'd better believe they were in baby swim lessons.

Kids yes, infants I don't really think so.  Life preservers instead maybe.  Man there is no way I could live on a boat with an infant. Talk about no sleep for two years!

Dicey

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 23723
  • Age: 67
  • Location: NorCal
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #35 on: January 12, 2017, 12:28:42 AM »
Posting to follow and learn with an open mind. DH just told me that our five month old granddaughter is "taking swimming lessons". Hmmm. Is this something new? How can babies possibly have enough motor control/upper body strength to propel themselves through the water? Is this a real thing or a fun activity for parents and babies to do together? I'm happy to see this topic here and look forward to seeing what other parents of young infants have to say about this. Thank you!

Trifle

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6710
  • Age: 58
  • Location: Outside, NC, US
    • In The Garden
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #36 on: January 12, 2017, 06:08:44 AM »
It's a fun activity. IMO the 'lessons' are not going to help a child avoid drowning.  Kids that young lack the motor skills.  A 3-4 year old can dog paddle, and most 5-6 year olds have the physical ability to do an overarm stroke/crawl.  See the article I posted above for more information. 

For babies/toddlers, the word of the day is "life jacket."  :)  And/or constant, arms-length supervision by an adult

njmoney

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #37 on: January 15, 2017, 08:39:33 AM »
My wife and I have had this discussion about the right time for lessons a few times.  We have a 2.5 year old.  We have a summer membership at the pool where we take him in the water a lot.  We are in a HCOL area and we went to check one place and it was $480 for either 10 or 12 classes.  Seemed extremely pricey to me.  I'd rather wait another year but we'll see if we can find something a bit less expensive this year and decide what to do.

cats

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1232
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #38 on: January 15, 2017, 02:03:58 PM »
Update to my original post, I discovered that one of the pools we were looking at often offers groupons so you can get 4 lessons for half off, and they'll also give you the first lesson free. So if you're like us and live in a HCOL area, look around and you may be able to find some ways of doing it less expensively!

njmoney

  • 5 O'Clock Shadow
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: swim lessons for babies--useful or no?
« Reply #39 on: January 15, 2017, 03:32:18 PM »
Update to my original post, I discovered that one of the pools we were looking at often offers groupons so you can get 4 lessons for half off, and they'll also give you the first lesson free. So if you're like us and live in a HCOL area, look around and you may be able to find some ways of doing it less expensively!

Great idea, thanks!