A clear majority voted for Negative/Flat/Mediocre.
Uh, no, they didn't.
As of right now, the poll shows:
Negative - another major crash or depression (7.2%)
Flat - stagnation, zero or near-zero net growth (15.5%)
Slow/mediocre growth - the market limps along below historical averages (49.5%)
Average growth - market returns in line with historical trends (25.8%)
Explosive growth - the market blows past all expectations (2.1%)
About half said slow/mediocre growth, but then you somehow lump in Negative and Flat with that? While it's true that negative and flat would push that 49.5% over 50%, so you could say, as you did "A clear majority voted for Negative/Flat/Mediocre," it's misleading.
I could say the opposite: A clear majority voted for Mediocre/Average/Explosive growth" and it would also be true (as it would too be over 50%)--and that fact (the opposite of yours), would be more true than your statement, as more people voted for that than for your combination.
The correct way to present the stats is: about 25% historical average or better, 50% slow growth, 25% flat or down.