Author Topic: Top is in  (Read 2213578 times)

MudPuppy

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1478
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7750 on: April 19, 2021, 06:46:53 AM »
Quote
We Are Lost and the World As We Know It Is Forever Gone From Our Eyes, Only To Live in Our Memories As the Days of Salad and Glory, Truly These Are the End of Times for Today Is An All Time High Fridays

Phrases that sound like they might be Fall Out Boy songs top is in

frugalnacho

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 5016
  • Age: 39
  • Location: Metro Detroit
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7751 on: April 19, 2021, 07:23:00 AM »
Sugar, we're going down (because the top is in)

Wintergreen78

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 485
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7752 on: April 19, 2021, 08:19:26 AM »
The top will be in during May, or June, or some time between 2024 and 2031. I read it here:
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/19/when-the-bull-market-will-end-according-to-sp-500-history.html

Apparently you should watch the VIX to know when the top is in. It either breaks down or goes through the roof. I can never remember that part...

maizefolk

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6604
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7753 on: April 19, 2021, 08:50:23 AM »
The top will be in during May, or June, or some time between 2024 and 2031. I read it here:
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/19/when-the-bull-market-will-end-according-to-sp-500-history.html

Apparently you should watch the VIX to know when the top is in. It either breaks down or goes through the roof. I can never remember that part...

My prediction is that the top will be (or is) in sometime before June of 2023 or after May of 2023.

SwordGuy

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8634
  • Location: Fayetteville, NC
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7754 on: April 19, 2021, 09:53:04 AM »
The top will be in during May, or June, or some time between 2024 and 2031. I read it here:
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/19/when-the-bull-market-will-end-according-to-sp-500-history.html

Apparently you should watch the VIX to know when the top is in. It either breaks down or goes through the roof. I can never remember that part...

My prediction is that the top will be (or is) in sometime before June of 2023 or after May of 2023.

You're so very wrong!  Wrong!   Wrong!

Top will be (or is) in sometime before July of 2023 or after June of 2023!  :)

solon

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2129
  • Age: 1821
  • Location: CO
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7755 on: April 19, 2021, 11:01:39 AM »
Before we forget it, the acronym is: WALWWKFGFOEOLOMDSGTTAETTATHF.

Although I may have left out some of the less significant words.

Wintergreen78

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 485
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7756 on: April 19, 2021, 01:17:51 PM »
Before we forget it, the acronym is: WALWWKFGFOEOLOMDSGTTAETTATHF.

Although I may have left out some of the less significant words.

Thank you! I tried to figure that out myself, but ended up with a headache.

BigMoneyJim

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 364
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Nomadic retiree in the Rockies
    • Jim's Personal Finance Blog
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7757 on: April 19, 2021, 01:35:58 PM »
My conscious brain hit the panic button and avoided trying to decipher it. My subconscious brain started seeing patterns, though. So far I've come up with "We All Like Wookies Wearing Knickers For Google..." I'm sure once if decipher the rest that will make sense.

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3254
  • Age: 92
  • Location: Upper left corner
  • FI(lean) working on the "RE"
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7758 on: April 19, 2021, 02:33:15 PM »
My conscious brain hit the panic button and avoided trying to decipher it. My subconscious brain started seeing patterns, though. So far I've come up with "We All Like Wookies Wearing Knickers For Google..." I'm sure once if decipher the rest that will make sense.
My interest in only piqued if the acroym is a palindrome (aka, Top Is In - Thorstache [TIIT]). One simply must have standards when it comes to the Top.

maizefolk

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6604
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7759 on: April 19, 2021, 03:06:18 PM »
My conscious brain hit the panic button and avoided trying to decipher it. My subconscious brain started seeing patterns, though. So far I've come up with "We All Like Wookies Wearing Knickers For Google..." I'm sure once if decipher the rest that will make sense.
My interest in only piqued if the acroym is a palindrome (aka, Top Is In - Thorstache [TIIT]). One simply must have standards when it comes to the Top.

Sadly I'm wasn't nearly creative enough to hide a message in there.

techwiz

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2764
  • Location: Ontario
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7760 on: April 19, 2021, 05:10:48 PM »
My conscious brain hit the panic button and avoided trying to decipher it. My subconscious brain started seeing patterns, though. So far I've come up with "We All Like Wookies Wearing Knickers For Google..." I'm sure once if decipher the rest that will make sense.
My interest in only piqued if the acroym is a palindrome (aka, Top Is In - Thorstache [TIIT]). One simply must have standards when it comes to the Top.

Sadly I'm wasn't nearly creative enough to hide a message in there.

With enough bakers I am sure a creative message can be found in the bread crumbs you left.

Wintergreen78

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 485
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7761 on: April 19, 2021, 06:34:29 PM »
My conscious brain hit the panic button and avoided trying to decipher it. My subconscious brain started seeing patterns, though. So far I've come up with "We All Like Wookies Wearing Knickers For Google..." I'm sure once if decipher the rest that will make sense.

Watch Out For Knicker-Wearing Google Wookiees (WOFKWGW)!

Recursive acronym top is in.

dragoncar

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 9765
  • Registered member
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7762 on: April 23, 2021, 01:31:38 PM »
My conscious brain hit the panic button and avoided trying to decipher it. My subconscious brain started seeing patterns, though. So far I've come up with "We All Like Wookies Wearing Knickers For Google..." I'm sure once if decipher the rest that will make sense.

Watch Out For Knicker-Wearing Google Wookiees (WOFKWGW)!

Recursive acronym top is in.

I think you mean:

Recursive Acronym Top Is RATIR

secondcor521

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4483
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Boise, Idaho
  • Big cattle, no hat.
    • Age of Eon - Overwatch player videos
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7763 on: April 23, 2021, 01:46:18 PM »
My conscious brain hit the panic button and avoided trying to decipher it. My subconscious brain started seeing patterns, though. So far I've come up with "We All Like Wookies Wearing Knickers For Google..." I'm sure once if decipher the rest that will make sense.

Watch Out For Knicker-Wearing Google Wookiees (WOFKWGW)!

Recursive acronym top is in.

I think you mean:

Recursive Acronym Top Is RATIR

Stack overflow top is in.

erutio

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 715
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7764 on: April 23, 2021, 02:56:21 PM »
They should start calling them "All-time high fridays." Seems like we're hitting one just about every week.

After 4 consecutive "All-time high Fridays", looks like we were short another ATHF by about 5 points today.   

ATHFs top is in

i_have_so_much_to_learn

  • Stubble
  • **
  • Posts: 172
  • Location: SF Bay, CA, USA
  • started a chatroom: https://discord.gg/agSSAhXzYD
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7765 on: April 23, 2021, 02:58:47 PM »
i'm not technical analysis expert, but given that the market is flying high like a baked treat... i do like muffin.... top is in.

aspiringnomad

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 956
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7766 on: April 23, 2021, 06:56:12 PM »
Very cool to come back here after several months to see the top is still in.


UnleashHell

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8805
  • Age: 54
  • Location: Florida
  • Chapter IV - A New ... er.. something
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7767 on: April 26, 2021, 05:20:22 AM »
My conscious brain hit the panic button and avoided trying to decipher it. My subconscious brain started seeing patterns, though. So far I've come up with "We All Like Wookies Wearing Knickers For Google..." I'm sure once if decipher the rest that will make sense.
My interest in only piqued if the acroym is a palindrome (aka, Top Is In - Thorstache [TIIT]). One simply must have standards when it comes to the Top.

This is the sort of investment advice I can get behind.


markbike528CBX

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1769
  • Location: the Everbrown part of the Evergreen State (WA)
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7768 on: May 04, 2021, 11:39:48 AM »
Sorry, I didn't inform the thread, but I withdrew from VTSAX yesterday.
It is my fault The TOP is IN!

solon

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 2129
  • Age: 1821
  • Location: CO
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7769 on: May 04, 2021, 11:45:54 AM »
Can the last one out please turn off the lights?

techwiz

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2764
  • Location: Ontario
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7770 on: May 04, 2021, 12:29:47 PM »
Can the last one out please turn off the lights?



Even with the lights out we still know the Top Is In!

Steeze

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1156
  • Age: 34
  • Location: NYC Area of Earth
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7771 on: May 04, 2021, 12:34:29 PM »
Sorry, I didn't inform the thread, but I withdrew from VTSAX yesterday.
It is my fault The TOP is IN!

Should sell in smaller lots next time so you donít trigger the algorithms

BicycleB

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4094
  • Location: Colombia
  • Older than the internet, but not wiser... yet
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7772 on: May 05, 2021, 12:46:05 AM »
Sorry, I didn't inform the thread, but I withdrew from VTSAX yesterday.
It is my fault The TOP is IN!

Should sell in smaller lots next time so you donít trigger the algorithms

(robot voice) Algorithm trigger warning... Top Is In...

PhilB

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3638
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7773 on: May 05, 2021, 02:28:54 AM »
Sorry, I didn't inform the thread, but I withdrew from VTSAX yesterday.
It is my fault The TOP is IN!

Should sell in smaller lots next time so you donít trigger the algorithms

(robot voice) Algorithm trigger warning... Top Is In...

I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you sell that...

ender

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6878
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7774 on: May 05, 2021, 06:54:06 AM »
Sorry, I didn't inform the thread, but I withdrew from VTSAX yesterday.
It is my fault The TOP is IN!

Should sell in smaller lots next time so you donít trigger the algorithms

(robot voice) Algorithm trigger warning... Top Is In...

I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you sell that...

SP500 over 9000 end of year, confirmed

SwordGuy

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8634
  • Location: Fayetteville, NC
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7775 on: May 05, 2021, 07:45:51 AM »
SP500 over 9000 end of year, confirmed

Thus speaks the heretic, the anti-Thorstach, the abomination of The One Great Truth..

Psychstache

  • Handlebar Stache
  • *****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7776 on: May 05, 2021, 07:50:32 AM »
Sorry, I didn't inform the thread, but I withdrew from VTSAX yesterday.
It is my fault The TOP is IN!

Sell in May and go away. It rhymes so it has to be true.

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3254
  • Age: 92
  • Location: Upper left corner
  • FI(lean) working on the "RE"
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7777 on: May 05, 2021, 10:35:55 AM »
Sorry, I didn't inform the thread, but I withdrew from VTSAX yesterday.
It is my fault The TOP is IN!

Should sell in smaller lots next time so you donít trigger the algorithms

(robot voice) Algorithm trigger warning... Top Is In...

I'm sorry Dave, I can't let you sell that...

SP500 over 9000 end of year, confirmed

 HAL 9000: This mission is too important for me to allow you to jeopardize it.

deborah

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 13248
  • Location: Australia or another awesome area

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3254
  • Age: 92
  • Location: Upper left corner
  • FI(lean) working on the "RE"
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7779 on: May 05, 2021, 02:16:50 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

dougules

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2879
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7780 on: May 05, 2021, 02:52:20 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific. 

maizefolk

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 6604
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7781 on: May 05, 2021, 02:56:50 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific.

4 294 967 295 in binary is 2^(32) − 1 and is written as 11111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. To add one more cent you'd have to use one more bit of memory to store the number than they are currently using.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2021, 02:58:41 PM by maizefolk »

dougules

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2879
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7782 on: May 05, 2021, 03:07:12 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific.

4 294 967 295 in binary is 2^(32) − 1 and is written as 11111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. To add one more cent you'd have to use one more bit of memory to store the number than they are currently using.

Yeah, after a bit I realized it was just (2^32-1)/10000.  I wonder what the word is on the fix. 

dragoncar

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 9765
  • Registered member
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7783 on: May 05, 2021, 03:18:08 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific.

4 294 967 295 in binary is 2^(32) − 1 and is written as 11111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. To add one more cent you'd have to use one more bit of memory to store the number than they are currently using.

Yeah, after a bit I realized it was just (2^32-1)/10000.  I wonder what the word is on the fix.

IF(SYMBOL==BRK.A){NEWPRICE=PRICE+MAXPRICE}

dougules

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2879
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7784 on: May 05, 2021, 03:34:43 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific.

4 294 967 295 in binary is 2^(32) − 1 and is written as 11111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. To add one more cent you'd have to use one more bit of memory to store the number than they are currently using.

Yeah, after a bit I realized it was just (2^32-1)/10000.  I wonder what the word is on the fix.

IF(SYMBOL==BRK.A){NEWPRICE=PRICE+MAXPRICE}

I see your point, but I'd like to float the idea that your solution needs a bit more precision. 

GuitarStv

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 19789
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7785 on: May 05, 2021, 03:39:44 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific.

4 294 967 295 in binary is 2^(32) − 1 and is written as 11111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. To add one more cent you'd have to use one more bit of memory to store the number than they are currently using.

Yeah, after a bit I realized it was just (2^32-1)/10000.  I wonder what the word is on the fix.

IF(SYMBOL==BRK.A){NEWPRICE=PRICE+MAXPRICE}

That'll still fail.  They just need to use a different datatype to store the value of PRICE+MAXPRICE.

mies

  • Pencil Stache
  • ****
  • Posts: 637
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7786 on: May 05, 2021, 03:52:42 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific.

4 294 967 295 in binary is 2^(32) − 1 and is written as 11111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. To add one more cent you'd have to use one more bit of memory to store the number than they are currently using.

Yeah, after a bit I realized it was just (2^32-1)/10000.  I wonder what the word is on the fix.

IF(SYMBOL==BRK.A){NEWPRICE=PRICE+MAXPRICE}

That'll still fail.  They just need to use a different datatype to store the value of PRICE+MAXPRICE.

NASDAQ's dirty little secret is out. The entire operation is run on an old 486 machine in a closet running custom software that was abandoned decades ago and everyone is afraid to touch.

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3254
  • Age: 92
  • Location: Upper left corner
  • FI(lean) working on the "RE"
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7787 on: May 05, 2021, 04:05:45 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific.

4 294 967 295 in binary is 2^(32) − 1 and is written as 11111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. To add one more cent you'd have to use one more bit of memory to store the number than they are currently using.

Yeah, after a bit I realized it was just (2^32-1)/10000.  I wonder what the word is on the fix.

IF(SYMBOL==BRK.A){NEWPRICE=PRICE+MAXPRICE}

That'll still fail.  They just need to use a different datatype to store the value of PRICE+MAXPRICE.

NASDAQ's dirty little secret is out. The entire operation is run on an old 486 machine in a closet running custom software that was abandoned decades ago and everyone is afraid to touch.
Say what you want, but there are still a lot of critical places where the floppy disc top is not yet in.

dragoncar

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 9765
  • Registered member
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7788 on: May 05, 2021, 04:20:08 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific.

4 294 967 295 in binary is 2^(32) − 1 and is written as 11111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. To add one more cent you'd have to use one more bit of memory to store the number than they are currently using.

Yeah, after a bit I realized it was just (2^32-1)/10000.  I wonder what the word is on the fix.

IF(SYMBOL==BRK.A){NEWPRICE=PRICE+MAXPRICE}

That'll still fail.  They just need to use a different datatype to store the value of PRICE+MAXPRICE.

Dynamic typing top is in

dragoncar

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 9765
  • Registered member
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7789 on: May 05, 2021, 04:23:26 PM »
The rest is left as an exercise to the reader

BicycleB

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4094
  • Location: Colombia
  • Older than the internet, but not wiser... yet
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7790 on: May 05, 2021, 04:28:51 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific.

4 294 967 295 in binary is 2^(32) − 1 and is written as 11111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. To add one more cent you'd have to use one more bit of memory to store the number than they are currently using.

Yeah, after a bit I realized it was just (2^32-1)/10000.  I wonder what the word is on the fix.

IF(SYMBOL==BRK.A){NEWPRICE=PRICE+MAXPRICE}

I see your point, but I'd like to float the idea that your solution needs a bit more precision.

LOL!

Well played, @dougules. Three jokes in one? On this base, surely witticism top achieved.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2021, 04:31:14 PM by BicycleB »

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3254
  • Age: 92
  • Location: Upper left corner
  • FI(lean) working on the "RE"
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7791 on: May 05, 2021, 04:34:18 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific.

4 294 967 295 in binary is 2^(32) − 1 and is written as 11111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. To add one more cent you'd have to use one more bit of memory to store the number than they are currently using.

Yeah, after a bit I realized it was just (2^32-1)/10000.  I wonder what the word is on the fix.

IF(SYMBOL==BRK.A){NEWPRICE=PRICE+MAXPRICE}

I see your point, but I'd like to float the idea that your solution needs a bit more precision.

LOL!

Well played, @dougules. Three jokes in one? On this base, surely witticism top achieved.
I thought you only got two witticisms in binary?

secondcor521

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 4483
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Boise, Idaho
  • Big cattle, no hat.
    • Age of Eon - Overwatch player videos
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7792 on: May 05, 2021, 04:35:55 PM »
I'd add something here, but I'm not the right type.  Cast stones if you must.

SwordGuy

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 8634
  • Location: Fayetteville, NC
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7793 on: May 05, 2021, 05:23:39 PM »
We had a similar problem with Italian Lira around 1990.   There was so much inflation in it that we couldn't hold the correct number in our datatypes.   We added a second field which represented the number of zeroes to add to the number and just ignored the leftover Lira, which simply wasn't worth keeping track of.

techwiz

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 2764
  • Location: Ontario
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7794 on: May 05, 2021, 05:48:54 PM »
We had a similar problem with Italian Lira around 1990.   There was so much inflation in it that we couldn't hold the correct number in our datatypes.   We added a second field which represented the number of zeroes to add to the number and just ignored the leftover Lira, which simply wasn't worth keeping track of.

I would think the same logic could apply here, once you reach $429,496 per share price you don't need to track to the fourth decimal place. I don't think many would care about a hundredth of a penny during those trades. 


GuitarStv

  • Senior Mustachian
  • ********
  • Posts: 19789
  • Age: 40
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7795 on: May 05, 2021, 06:09:01 PM »
The top is in for Berkshire Hathaway

https://www.forexlive.com/news/!/berkshire-hathaways-stock-price-is-too-high-nasdaq-temporarily-suspended-prices-20210505
Really inspires confidence when the nasdaq of all exchanges gets a Y2K type problem like not being able to handle a high stock price. But, that is also a pretty unique and respectable way to hit the Top.

"The biggest number they can handle is $429,496.7295"  This is so very oddly specific.

4 294 967 295 in binary is 2^(32) − 1 and is written as 11111111111111111111111111111111 in binary. To add one more cent you'd have to use one more bit of memory to store the number than they are currently using.

Yeah, after a bit I realized it was just (2^32-1)/10000.  I wonder what the word is on the fix.

IF(SYMBOL==BRK.A){NEWPRICE=PRICE+MAXPRICE}

That'll still fail.  They just need to use a different datatype to store the value of PRICE+MAXPRICE.

NASDAQ's dirty little secret is out. The entire operation is run on an old 486 machine in a closet running custom software that was abandoned decades ago and everyone is afraid to touch.

Meh.  486s are pretty recent.  I've got friends working on some nuclear plants who had to learn '60s era Fortran.

Rdy2Fire

  • Bristles
  • ***
  • Posts: 434
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7796 on: May 05, 2021, 07:17:03 PM »
Top will never be in! It was 'in' about 10000 times since the great depression.

I know someone who believes it and has an insane amount of cash literally buried and has added to it for like 15 yrs as it sits in the dirt losing money FYI his top was in and just keeps going down and down and down

Glenstache

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3254
  • Age: 92
  • Location: Upper left corner
  • FI(lean) working on the "RE"
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7797 on: May 05, 2021, 08:11:50 PM »
We had a similar problem with Italian Lira around 1990.   There was so much inflation in it that we couldn't hold the correct number in our datatypes.   We added a second field which represented the number of zeroes to add to the number and just ignored the leftover Lira, which simply wasn't worth keeping track of.

I would think the same logic could apply here, once you reach $429,496 per share price you don't need to track to the fourth decimal place. I don't think many would care about a hundredth of a penny during those trades.
Wasn't this the entire basis of the Office Space skimming scheme?

Travis

  • Magnum Stache
  • ******
  • Posts: 3885
  • Location: South Korea
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7798 on: May 05, 2021, 09:36:32 PM »

NASDAQ's dirty little secret is out. The entire operation is run on an old 486 machine in a closet running custom software that was abandoned decades ago and everyone is afraid to touch.

Sounds like a DoD financial computer.


Meh.  486s are pretty recent.  I've got friends working on some nuclear plants who had to learn '60s era Fortran.

Back in 2000 they were teaching Fortran at my university as entry-level coding.

dragoncar

  • Walrus Stache
  • *******
  • Posts: 9765
  • Registered member
Re: Top is in
« Reply #7799 on: May 06, 2021, 12:00:48 AM »
We had a similar problem with Italian Lira around 1990.   There was so much inflation in it that we couldn't hold the correct number in our datatypes.   We added a second field which represented the number of zeroes to add to the number and just ignored the leftover Lira, which simply wasn't worth keeping track of.

I would think the same logic could apply here, once you reach $429,496 per share price you don't need to track to the fourth decimal place. I don't think many would care about a hundredth of a penny during those trades.
Wasn't this the entire basis of the Office Space skimming scheme?

I donít want to jump to conclusions, but Iím pretty sure it was the plot of Superman 3?