Relative to a conventional PP you'd be underweight cash and precious metals, and have none of the long term government bonds, a bit of extra equity, and a giant chunk of real estate which isn't part of the original PP allocation (it also sums to 102% but I'm assuming that's rounding issues).
As a purely logistical level, are you planning to fill the real estate chunk with REITs or with individual properties you purchase yourself? The first is a lot more convenient, but introduces significant interest rate risk, the latter may have higher returns, and often you can lock in interest rates for 30 years, but may also require a lot more time commitment and hands on work than the other components of your proposed portfolio.
Given what is over/under-weighted, this looks like a portfolio geared pretty specifically at strongly hedging against inflation (precious metals, real estate, and potentially cryptocurrencies), potentially at the expense of reduced hedging against recessions and depressions as well as the original permanent portfolio did (cash and long term bonds*). Do you find that you're much more worried about the risks of inflation than the risks of a recession/depression?
*Note that plenty of people think that cash and bonds (particularly at the levels suggested in the permanent portfolio) are an unnecessarily conservative hedge against recession, and can increase your long term risk of running out of money because your portfolio doesn't grown fast enough, but that is a separate debate.