Five years is a pretty short time period to count on the stock market beating a given rate. Historically there has been about a 1 in 5 chance that the SP500 will return worse than 2.69% over a 5 year period.
Only 1 in 4 years have negative stock returns, although they do clump together in crashes.
https://www.icmarc.org/prebuilt/apps/downloadDoc.aspPortfolio visualizer lacks data for the full 1970-1974 period, so the only negative non-overlapping 5 years with a loss I see is 2000-2004. Even then, with 3 years of dot-com crash, the return annualizes to -1.4% per year.
If you were able to get a loan with the features below, is there an interest rate that would tempt you?
- Unsecured
- Repayment term of up to 5 years
- Principal not to exceed your yearly salary
Right now, my bank (non-US) offers a 5 year loan term at about 2.69%, which sounds pretty good since inflation make that pretty close to free money. I have asked my manager if he can get me a better rate, which he might since the year is coming to a close and there may be some kind of incentive to hit sales targets.
What do y'all think? I have no immediate need for a loan, but I am tempted just to have dry powder at hand to invest or buy my little retirement pad.
Let's say it works, and you get +60% in 5 years, and you repay the loan plus 14% interest. What does that other 46% do to your overall assets? Does it move up your retirement date?
If it has a significant impact, the risk could be worth it. The market is more likely to do well over 5 years than have a loss. If stocks do well for a few years, and CDs are paying 3%, you could even switch from stock market to CDs to lock in your gains.
But you need to also figure out what happens with a loss, and see how much damage that does to your assets & retirement date. That's what I would balance: likely loss/years of extra work versus gains/years of extra retirement.