Personally, I like to use Morningstar's 9-box to rate value or small cap tilts. While AVES mentioned already, I'll run it through this approach:
left side is value: 35+15+5 = 55% value
right side is growth: 2+1 = 3% growth
If you have 10% value and 10% growth, there's no tilt at all: it's neutral. That's why I subtract the growth percentage from the value percentage: 55 - 3 = 52% value tilt. AVES also is the only ETF with any small cap (8%).
https://www.morningstar.com/etfs/arcx/aves/portfolioUsing value - growth in my suggestion of MSCI EM Vl Mntm: (42 + 22) - (6 + 1) = 57% value tilt. So despite combining value and momentum, it has slightly more value tilt than AVES.
https://www.morningstar.com/etfs/arcx/uevm/portfolioFirst Trust Emerging holds 58 - 3 = 55% value tilt.
https://www.morningstar.com/etfs/xnas/fem/portfolioFinally Schwab Fundamental with a 60 - 2 = 58% value tilt.
https://www.morningstar.com/etfs/arcx/fnde/portfolioYou could also consider price/earnings ratio (P/E) or price/book ratio (P/B), both of which are used to separate value from growth. The one I mentioned, UEVM, has a 0.75 p/b, while the others are 0.92 and higher.
@samsonator54321 - Value has been trailing growth for years, which I attribute to a bias against tech stocks. All the big tech stocks have high P/E and P/B values that exclude them from value screens (except for Buffet's, apparently - Berkshire bought lots of Apple stock).
Apple stock's performance was 27% over 10 years... and 40% over the past 5 years. Not really slowing down... Amazon returned 32% for a decade, and 34% for 5 years. I wouldn't buy those companies specifically, but with a value tilt, they're underweighted in your portfolio.