And that's where it starts to get difficult with investing - volume. You can easily win (or lose) one trade or pick or gamble. But to get to the thousands of data points needed to distinguish from luck, how many individuals have the resources and time to figure that out reasonably early in their investing career?
I think smart investors realize that they don't need to rely solely on their own data points.
If they buying broad index funds, I agree with you. Anything departing from that means you're doing something nobody else is doing - even if you're following a strategy from others, how do you judge your individual ability to implement that strategy?
Actually can screw it up even with the basic index fund strategy, but keeping withdrawal needs low and buying / holding are relatively straightforward to understand and implement.
My personal opinion: if you want to actively trade or buy and hold individual stocks, or take any approach other than buying broad-based indexes and ignoring them, you should track your total performance over time. Not “I bought this one stock and it went up a bunch”, not “I sold a bunch last year before the market went down so I missed that 10% drop”, but “my 3 year returns over my entire portfolio are x% apy, my 5 year returns are y% apy, and my 10 year returns are z% apy”
If you aren’t seriously tracking your performance it is easy to fool yourself that you are cleverer/more lucky than you really are.