Say you have the following two scenarios:
Scenario 1 - you invest 100k and let it grow for 15 years. At the end of 15 years, you sell it and pay $7688.85 in taxes.
Scenario 2 - you invest 100k and let it grow for 4 years. You sell it and pay capital gains tax of $1882.63. You then invest it again in an equally performing fund and achieve identical gains for the remaining 11 years.
Who comes out on top? My calculations show that the results are more or less identical. Did I miss something? Did I not account for locking in a lower cost basis after buying new stocks after 4 years? Or am I right in that as long as you wait over a year to sell to lock in long term capital gains taxes, it doesn't matter when you sell after that, whether it is 2 years or 20 years?
1.03 interest/year
0.15 tax rate on capital gains
Scenario 1 Scenario 2
$100,000.00 $100,000.00
$103,000.00 $103,000.00
$106,090.00 $106,090.00
$109,272.70 $109,272.70
$112,550.88 $112,550.88 Scenario 2 opportunity loss
$115,927.41 $114,044.78 $1,882.63
$119,405.23 $117,466.12 $1,939.11
$122,987.39 $120,990.10 $1,997.28
$126,677.01 $124,619.81 $2,057.20
$130,477.32 $128,358.40 $2,118.92
$134,391.64 $132,209.15 $2,182.49
$138,423.39 $136,175.43 $2,247.96
$142,576.09 $140,260.69 $2,315.40
$146,853.37 $144,468.51 $2,384.86
$151,258.97 $148,802.56 $2,456.41
$7,688.85 $7,320.38 $368.31
$7,688.69