On the individual side, I think it's pretty much just a shell game that, without future changes, will probably net out to about +/- neutral over the whole ten years, depending on where you are in terms of annual income, and depending on whether that income is derived from your labor or from investments.
On the corporate side, companies currently paying the top marginal rate, mostly smaller companies (but not exclusively so), could see dramatic improvements and potentially create a lot more jobs, depending on their available growth opportunities.
Larger international companies who, on average, currently pay about 24%. I don't see such dramatic potential there, even if they can pull in cash from overseas at a lower rate. Access to capital is not a problem for them right now. If they had jobs to create, and opportunities to invest in faster growth, they would have already done that.
For them, I think the most likely scenario is to pay down debt, buy-back stock, distribute it in dividends, or just bank it. All of which would be more beneficial to investors rather than to wage-earners or to incremental increases in employment.
Having more cash has never been a rationale for handing out raises (except maybe for executives). Wages are driven by whatever competitive salaries and other benefits can be offered to attract and retain the talent needed to run/grow the business, and no more.