Like many of you, I generally look down on the financial planning industry because of the exorbitant fees and bad advice that occur there. But one of my friends, who I respect as a person of integrity, is a financial planner. I took him out to lunch to learn what the industry is all about.
We started by analyzing my FIRE plans, and I could tell he was very concerned about how risky it is. 4% planned withdrawal rates, 100% invested in Vanguard's S&P 500 index, etc. He easily convinced me that I hadn't planned well enough yet for actually getting and using my money before 59 and gave me some good tips about accessing the money.
But to keep this story short, here is the true value he adds; it became obvious that his goal was to eliminate risk. I'm not entirely sure he knows that is what he does, but it was the underlying theme of every piece of advice I got from him.
Me, I'm trying to optimize my financial affairs for a very early retirement by balancing risk and reward. If the dice don't fall my way, I'll work an extra couple of years and retire at 46 instead of 43. I'll do a little freelancing, or even burger flipping, at 55 if the market completely tanks that year. Eliminating risk is too expensive for me, and doesn't feel necessary. I feel like I can see the risks and I'm prepared to deal with them when they come, so I don't need to eliminate them. I'm most likely to end up with too much money rather than too little, and it doesn't break my heart to pay 25% taxes if my 401k grows too big.
But I also learned that there is a useful purpose to financial planning, whole life insurance, and all the other bells and whistles. It just doesn't mesh with my own goals. I don't have to look down on the industry anymore; what they are selling can be good, it is just designed for someone else's palate.