I believe that:
1) Yes, the link expects you to stay at 75/25
2) The discrepancy is due to differing interpretations of what's safest, perhaps including different assumptions about the investor's behavior
3) FIRE analysts tend to emphasize a longer period because we assume you'll take care of your health
4) Longer periods usually benefit from higher stock %
interesting about health. avg lifespan of a male is 76.
Lets say those that FiRE lives to an avg of 80.
lets say the avg male retires at age 66, giving him 10years in retirement. the recommended allocation for him is 40/60.
for those that FiRE,
why keep 75/25 instead of 40/60 when we turn 70?
yes, longer periods benefit from higher stock %.
but at age 70, we dont have that much of a time period left (on avg).