I know this subject comes up quite a bit, and often it is done in a pretty shady way. So let's briefly set the stage:
- my child has begun to do real work for my business (video editing and creating short videos for marketing purposes). This is work that I have paid outside contractors to do in the past and is absolutely necessary for my business. My child is mid-teens.
- I am currently operating as a sole-proprietor, but after moving this year I may switch to an S-corp for next year (that's another post)
- Looking to the future, I want to pay my child in a way that legally saves taxes.
- I am also encouraging my child to offer her video editing services to others (there is a niche in her hobby where she could create videos for her coaches for advertising and website content).
Online sources state that hiring a child in an S-corp is not usually financially beneficial because of the necessary withholdings. The most common "workaround" I've seen is to create a "family management company" which seems to be the way to funnel earnings to the child without paying witholdings. (Like this article suggests:
https://wealthfactory.com/articles/how-to-avoid-payroll-tax-for-your-children-if-your-business-is-an-s-corp/ - to me that "feels" pretty shady. I think I have come up with a better solution.
Better solution: I think it would work better for my child to create their own sole-proprietorship and then hire them as a contract (1099 employee). If my child was 25 and a freelance video editor who I hired online, this is exactly how I would hire them. The only difference is their age. (I am not in one of the 4 states that forbit minors from owning a business).
So, to answer a few questions: I would need to strictly abide by the IRS rules governing W-2 employees vs. 1099 contractors, including:
- child should have their own tools (computer, editing software, cloud account, etc)
- child should have the right to determine when they work, and what the final product looks like
- the job duties would be very limited in scope (just video editing), not also taking out trash, filing, etc.
- I would create a clear contract for the work to be done between my s-corp and their sole-proprietorship
- sole-proprietorship should bill my s-corp and payment made to sole-proprietorship
- child is free to enter into business relationships with other companies/organizations (which I hope they will do)
- child is paid per project, not hourly or monthly
- child will file federal and state taxes annually
Again, to me this seems more like the real world. After all, why should my contractor be penalized because they are related to me? If my child was 10 years older and wasn't related to me, this is exactly how the working relationship would be categorized.
...
And now that I've typed all that out, I realize that my language of "contractor" may be messing things up. It seems like it would be even simpler to say: My child started a business (sole-prop) and my s-corp has purchased services from their business (e.g., YY videos clips @ $XXX per video clip). End of story.
What am I missing?